Journals / Journal of Design Studio / 2022 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

The Analysis of the School Factor in Industrial Design Competitions: 2015-2020 İMMİB* Competition Student Category Winners

Pages
125–138
Publication Date
2022-12-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Ethics and privacy are revealed as potential problem areas as an outcome of carrying out the competition preparation during course hours.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Turkish Steel Exporters’ Association (İMMİB) Industrial Design Competition is important both for professionals and students among Turkish designer community for many reasons.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this reason, data on 2015-2020 İMMİB Industrial Design Competition winners have been analysed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Ethics and privacy are revealed as potential problem areas as an outcome of carrying out the competition preparation during course hours.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2015-2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Design Education · Design Competition · Design Studio Curricula

Abstract

Turkish Steel Exporters’ Association (İMMİB) Industrial Design Competition is important both for professionals and students among Turkish designer community for many reasons. In addition to its nationwide recognition, the winners are awarded with many monetary and non-monetary benefits. Particularly the international scholarship for graduate education is a major motivating factor for students for participating to the competition. The main objective of this study is to reveal school related factors that affect İMMİB Industrial Design Competition student category results. For this reason, data on 2015-2020 İMMİB Industrial Design Competition winners have been analysed. The analysis has been carried out by doing document analysis from secondary sources and applying an on-line survey to the winners. A total of 92 prizes have been distributed between 2015-2020 to 84 students. Out of 84 students, 42 participated to the survey and 40 valid responses were obtained. Results reveal that i) the older the department, the higher the frequency of winners coming from that particular university, ii) for students coming from universities adopting the central examination system, the majority of students have relatively high entrance exam scores, iii) the majority of the projects are done during course hours at school, particularly in the case of privately owned universities. This paper discusses the reasons and the outcomes of working competition projects during course hours particularly design studio courses. Ethics and privacy are revealed as potential problem areas as an outcome of carrying out the competition preparation during course hours.

🔖

Cite This Article

SOYLU, H. Y., ŞALGAMCIOĞLU, B. K., ÖKSÜZ, K. B. (2022). The Analysis of the School Factor in Industrial Design Competitions: 2015-2020 İMMİB* Competition Student Category Winners. Journal of Design Studio, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 125–138. https://ajindex.com/articles/869193

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Boyer, E. & Mitgang, L. (1996) Building Community: A New Future for Architectural Education and Practice. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Camilli, G. & Hopkins, K.D., (1978) Applicability of chi-square to 2× 2 contingency tables with small expected cell frequencies. Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 85, No. 1, pp.163-167.
  2. Connelly, L.M. (2016) 'Fisher's exact test', MedSurg Nursing, Vol. 25, No.1 (online), Available at: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A444912943/AONE?u=anon~762f4513&sid=googleScholar&xid=84c846ae (accessed 25 March 2022).
  3. Çopur, M. (2017) İMMİB Endüstrivel Tasarım Yarışmalarının Değerlendirilmesi (Evaluation of İMMİB Industrial Design Competitions). Unpublished MSc thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara. de-Juan, A., Fernandez del Rincon, A., Iglesias, M., Garcia, P., Diez-Ibarbia, A. & Viadero, F., (2016) Enhancement of mechanical engineering degree through student design competition as added value. Considerations and viability. Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 27, No.8, pp.568-589.
  4. Dilek, İ. & Kaygan, P. (2018) Different goals, different criteria: Perspectives of jury members in industrial design competitions in turkey. A/Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, Vol. 15, No.3, pp.13-27.
  5. Er, H.A., Özcan, C., Ertem, H. (2021) I'm design chat 10 memleketten tasarım manzaraları: “Tasarım Yarışmaları” (online), Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ys-rglSUHIU (accessed 23 March 2021).
  6. Fawcett, J., & Garity, J. (2009) Evaluating Research for Evidence Based Practice. Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis. Frascara, J. (2002) Preface, in Frascara, J (Ed) Design and Social Sciences: Making Connections. London: Taylor and Francis. Gelmez, K. (2011, December) İMMİB Endüstriyel Tasarım Yarışmaları Üzerine Bir Inceleme: 2005–2009 (An Analysis on İMMİB Industrial Design Competitions: 2005–2009),
  7. In Endüstride, Tasarımda, Eğitimde 40 Yıl Conference, pp. 339-353.
  8. Gottschling, P. (2018) Where design competitions matter: Architectural artefacts and discursive events, Journal of Material Culture, Vol. 23, No, 2, pp.151-168.
  9. Haupt, P., Wijas, M., Mochocka, S., & Chyb, A. (2019) Teaching architectural design through competition, motivation and challenge. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, Vol. 17, No.3, pp. 338-342.
  10. Hermand, S., & Rajeb, S. B. (2019, June) Using Design Competition Calls in a “Design Studio” Course. In AMPS Conference 17.1, pp. 167-176.
  11. Irkdaş Doğu, D., Timur Öğüt, Ş. &