Journals / International Journal of Current Approaches in Language, Education and Social Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

IN THE LENS OF EFL INSTRUCTORS: EMERGENCY REMOTE EDUCATION

Pages
103–127
Publication Date
2022-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, it was found that both university instructors have similar ideas about the emergency remote teaching during the Covid- 19.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Distance education is a well-known type of education, which is conducted when students do not have the chance or time to attend school physically.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With the Covid 19 pandemic, distance education has come to the fore under the name of emergency remote education.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, it was found that both university instructors have similar ideas about the emergency remote teaching during the Covid- 19.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Distance education · emergency remote education · Language education during the pandemic

Abstract

Distance education is a well-known type of education, which is conducted when students do not have the chance or time to attend school physically. With the Covid 19 pandemic, distance education has come to the fore under the name of emergency remote education. This study’s ultimate purpose is to explore the experienced emergency English language remote education process and compare the private and state universities from the perspectives of tertiary instructors. To take a photograph of the novel emergency remote education, the opinions of one hundred and thirty-four English language instructors who have been working for English preparatory programs at universities’ schools of foreign languages were asked. To collect the data, instructors were given a questionnaire. After the data collection, items were divided into 5 groups such as online education, instructors’ adaptation to online education, university support, learners, and instructors’ online course. Then each question was examined through SPSS. The means were found to see the highest value each item had. Also, the answers of both university instructors were compared using chi- square and the items which show a statistically significant difference were presented in the study. As a result, it was found that both university instructors have similar ideas about the emergency remote teaching during the Covid- 19.

🔖

Cite This Article

PAYDAŞ, İ., SAKA, F. Ö. (2022). IN THE LENS OF EFL INSTRUCTORS: EMERGENCY REMOTE EDUCATION. International Journal of Current Approaches in Language, Education and Social Sciences, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 103–127. https://ajindex.com/articles/868609

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akbana, Y. E., Rathert, S., & Ağçam, R. (2021). Emergency remote education in foreign and second language teaching. Turkish Journal of Education, 10(2), 97–124. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.865344
  2. Alhawsawi, S. & Jawhar, S. S. (2021). Negotiating pedagogical positions in higher education during Covid- 19 pandemic: Teacher’s narratives. Heliyon, 7(6), e07158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07158
  3. Altınpulluk, H. (2021). Türkiye’deki öğretim üyelerinin Covid- 19 küresel salgın sürecindeki uzaktan eğitim uygulamalarına ilişkin görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 41(1), 53–89.
  4. Atmojo, A. E. P., & Nugroho, A. (2020). EFL classes must go online! Teaching activities and challenges during Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Register Journal, 13(1), 49–76. https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v13i1.49-76
  5. Bolliger, D. U., & Wasilik, O. (2009). Factors influencing faculty satisfaction with online teaching and learning in higher education. Distance Education, 30(1), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910902845949
  6. Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81–109. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444803001903
  7. Bozkurt, A. (2020). Koronavirüs (Covid- 19) pandemi süreci ve pandemi sonrası dünyada eğitime yönelik değerlendirmeler: Yeni normal ve yeni eğitim paradigması. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(3), 112–142. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/auad/issue/56247/773769
  8. Brereton, P. (2021). Emergency remote training: Guiding and supporting teachers in preparation for emergency remote teaching. Language Research Bulletin, 35, 1-13.
  9. Cantürk, G., & Cantürk, A. (2021). Determining the opinions of English teachers about the distance online education experience in Covid- 19 pandemic by using metaphors. International Journal of Current Approaches in Language, Education and Social Sciences (CALESS), 3(1), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.35452/caless.2021.1
  10. Collazos, Y. D., & Burbano, N. A. D. (2021). Foreign language teachers’ experiences about the transition from face- to- face instruction to emergency remote teaching from a narrative perspective. Revista Boletin Repide, 11 (2), 355-365. https://doi.org/10.36260/rbr.v11i2.1689
  11. Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Oxford University Press.
  12. Erarslan, A. (2021). English language teaching and learning during Covid- 19: A global perspective on