SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Current Approaches in Language, Education and Social Sciences / 2026 / Volume: 8 Issue: 2

Factors Affecting Student Motivation in the Classroom: Motivating Factors and Hygiene Factors

Yasemin Yeşilbaş Özenç(AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-5590-4520
Ramazan Başaran(AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-0646-4458
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-10-25
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, students emphasized motivating factors more than hygiene factors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Motivation is the power that mobilizes an individual to achieve a goal.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore, it is important to determine the factors that increase students' motivation and to implement practices that increase student motivation in the classroom.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, students emphasized motivating factors more than hygiene factors.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019-2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:motivation · student · Herzberg

Abstract

Motivation is the power that mobilizes an individual to achieve a goal. Students need to be motivated to play an active role in educational process and achieve targeted outcomes. Therefore, it is important to determine the factors that increase students' motivation and to implement practices that increase student motivation in the classroom. This study investigated student perspectives on motivating and hygiene factors affecting their classroom motivation. The research employed a basic qualitative design and involved 936 undergraduate students from a state university in Turkey (2019-2020 academic year). Participants were chosen through convenience sampling, a purposive sampling method. Data collection occurred through an unstructured form developed by the researchers. MAXQDA 20 software facilitated data analysis. Five themes emerged from student responses regarding classroom motivation: teacher, student, learning environment, teaching content, and other factors. Teacher characteristics were identified as the most significant motivators, encompassing both hygiene and motivational factors. Overall, students emphasized motivating factors more than hygiene factors. The study suggests that school administrators and teachers should consider these factors to enhance student learning motivation and academic achievement. By exhibiting behaviors that address these factors, educators can foster a more positive and motivating learning environment for students.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özenç, Y. Y., Başaran, R. (2026). Factors Affecting Student Motivation in the Classroom: Motivating Factors and Hygiene Factors. International Journal of Current Approaches in Language, Education and Social Sciences, Volume: 8 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.35452/caless.1930371

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (85)

  1. Agustina, E. T., Wahyudin, A. Y., & Pratiwi, A. A. 2021. The students’ motivation and academic achievement at tertiary level: A correlational study. Journal of Arts and Education, 1(1), 29-38.
  2. Akbaba, S. (2010). Eğitimde motivasyon. Atatürk Üniversitesi Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13, 343-361. https://izlik.org/JA42WF29CR
  3. Andrietti, V., & Su, X. (2018). Education curriculum and student achievement: theory and evidence. Education Economics, 27(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2018.1527894
  4. Atkinson, E. (2000). An investigation into the relationship between teacher motivation and pupil motivation. Educational Psychology, 20, 45-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/014434100110371
  5. Bassett-Jones, N., & Lloyd, G. (2005). Does Herzberg's motivation theory have staying power? Journal of Management Development, 24, 929-943. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710510627064
  6. Bhatt, R., Koedel, C., & Lehmann, D. (2013). Is curriculum quality uniform? Evidence from Florida. Economics of Education Review, 34, 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.01.014
  7. Braun, V., Clarke, V., Boulton, E., Davey, L., & McEvoy, C. (2021). The online survey as a qualitative research tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(6), 641-654. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1805550
  8. Brophy, J. (1983). Conceptualizing student motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18(3), 200-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461528309529274
  9. Bureau, J. S., Howard, J. L., Chong, J. X., & Guay, F. (2022). Pathways to student motivation: A meta-analysis of antecedents of autonomous and controlled motivations. Review of Educational Research, 92(1), 46-72. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211042426
  10. Campbell, C. (1991). Reexamining mills on motive: A character vocabulary approach. Sociology of Religion, 52, 89-97. https://doi.org/10.2307/3710717
  11. Can, Ş. (2005). Öğretme-öğrenmede ipuçları ve pekiştireçlerin rolü. Muğla Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14, 97-109. https://izlik.org/JA26RF92DA
  12. Christensen, L., & Menzel, K. (1998). The linear relationship between student reports of teacher immediacy behaviors and perceptions of state motivation, and of Cognitive, affective, and behavioral learning. Communication Education, 47, 82-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529809379112
  13. Çolak, E., & Cırık, İ. (2015). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin motivasyon kaynaklarının incelenmesi. İlköğretim Online, 14(4), 1307-1326. https://doi.org/10.17051/io.2015.08906
  14. Cooper, J. M., Jones, H. L., & Weber, W. A. (1973). Specifying teacher competencies. Journal of Teacher Education, 24(1), 17-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248717302400103
  15. Creemers, B., & Reezigt, G. (1996). School-level conditions affecting the effectiveness of instruction. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7, 197-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/0924345960070301
  16. Danielson, C. (1998). Is satisfying college students the same as decreasing their dissatisfaction? AIR 1998 Annual Forum Paper.
  17. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
  18. Donald, J. G. (1999). Motivation for higher‐order learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, (78), 27-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tl.7803
  19. Dönmez, B. (2013). Motivasyon, S. Özdemir (Ed.), In Eğitim yönetiminde kuram ve uygulama (pp. 185-225). Pegem Yayıncılık.
  20. Dornyei, Z. (2000). Motivation in action: Towards a process-oriented conceptualization of student motivation. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(4), 519-38. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709900158281
  21. Drafke, M. W., & Kossen, S. (1998). The human side of organizations. Addison-Wesley.
  22. Dvorak, J., & Phillips, K. (2001). Job satisfaction of high school journalism educators. Annual Meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, East Lansing.
  23. Engle, T. L., & Snellgrove, L. (1979). Psychology: Its principles and applications. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  24. Erdem, A. R. (1998). Süreç kuramlarının eğitim yönetimine katkıları. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(4), 51-57. https://izlik.org/JA48AT97ME
  25. Eren, E. (2007). Örgütsel davranış ve yönetim psikolojisi. Beta Yayıncılık.
  26. Ergin, A., & Karatas, H. (2018). Üniversite öğrencilerinin başarı odaklı motivasyon düzeyleri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(4), 868-887. http://doi.org/10.16986/huje.2018036646
  27. Ergül, H. F. (2005). Motivasyon ve motivasyon teknikleri. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(14), 67-79. https://izlik.org/JA82RK85UP
  28. Fazey, D. M., & Fazey, J. A. (2001). The potential for autonomy in learning: Perceptions of competence, motivation and locus of control in first-year undergraduate students. Studies in Higher Education, 26(3), 345-361. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070120076309
  29. Gilav, A. (2016). Investigating the impact of environmental factors on learning and academic achievement of elementary students: Review. International Journal of Medical Research and Health Sciences, 5, 360-369.
  30. Goldberg, N. A., & Ingram, K. W. (2011). Improving student engagement in a lower-division botany course. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(2), 76-90.
  31. Gorham, J., & Millette, D. M. (1997). A comparative analysis of teacher and student perceptions of sources of motivation and demotivation in college classes. Communication education, 46(4), 245-261. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529709379099
  32. Güçlü, N. (2017). Sınıf yönetimi. G. Yüksel & S. Büyükalan Filiz (Ed.). In Sınıf içi iletişim ve etkileşim (pp. 47-87). Pegem Yayıncılık.
  33. Güney, S. (2015). Örgütsel davranış. Nobel.
  34. Gürgan, U. (2015). Sınıfta güdülenme. R. Sarpkaya (Ed.), In Sınıf yönetimi (pp. 295-328). Anı Yayıncılık.
  35. Hatırlı, Y., & Duran, Y. (2015). Öğrenmede motivasyonu etkileyen faktörlerin belirlenmesi: Isparta Meslek Yüksekokulu öğrencileri üzerine bir uygulama. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 4(2), 330-343. https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.415332
  36. Hellriegel, D., Slocum, A., & Woodman, R. W. (1995). Organizational behavior. West Publish Company.
  37. Herzberg, F. I., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The motivation to work. John Wiley & Sons.
  38. Higgins, S., Hall, E., Wall, K., Woolner, P., & McCaughey, C. (2005). The impact of school environments: A literature review. The Centre for Learning and Teaching School of Education, Communication and Language Science, University of Newcastle.
  39. Howard, J., Bureau, J., Guay, F., Chong, J., & Ryan, R. (2021). Student motivation and associated outcomes: A meta-analysis from self-determination theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16, 1300-1323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966789
  40. Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2015). Eğitim yönetimi: Teori, araştırma ve uygulama. S. Turan (Çev. Ed.). Nobel Yayıncılık.
  41. Husman, J., & Lens, W. (1999). The role of the future in student motivation. Educational Psychologist, 34, 113-125. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3402_4
  42. Ibrahim, I. W., Ghazali, I. M., Abdullah, S. A. S., Rahmat, N. H., Hamid, M. H. A., & Azhari, S. H. A. (2023). Exploring motivation for learning using Herzberg's Two Factor Theory. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(3), 1007-1024. https://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i3/16480
  43. Jansen, H. (2010). The logic of qualitative survey research and its position in the field of social research methods. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(2), Article 11.
  44. Johansen, M. O., Eliassen, S., & Jeno, L. M. (2023). “Why is this relevant for me?”: Increasing content relevance enhances student motivation and vitality. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1184804. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1184804
  45. Katt, J. A., & Condly, S. J. (2009). A preliminary study of classroom motivators and de-motivators from a motivation-hygiene perspective. Communication Education, 58(2), 213-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520802511472
  46. Kelecioğlu, H. (1992). Güdülenme. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 7(1), 175-181. https://izlik.org/JA69TY99FE
  47. Kember, D., Ho, A., & Hong, C. (2010). Characterising a teaching and learning environment capable of motivating student learning. Learning Environments Research, 13(1), 43-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-009-9065-8
  48. Kleinbeck, U. (2004). Motives and goals. Reference Module in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology 47-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.05637-6
  49. Koçel, T. (2003). Yönetim ve organizasyon. Organizasyonlarda davranış, klasik, modern, çağdaş ve güncel yaklaşımlar. Beta Yayıncılık.
  50. Košir, K., & Tement, S. (2014). Teacher-student relationship and academic achievement: A cross-lagged longitudinal study on three different age groups. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 29(3), 409-428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-013-0205-2
  51. Lee, J., & Shute, V. (2010). Personal and social-contextual factors in K-12 academic performance: An integrative perspective on student learning. Educational Psychologist, 45(3), 185-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2010.493471
  52. Lepper, M. R. (1988). Motivational considerations in the study of instruction. Cognition and instruction, 5(4), 289-309.
  53. Linnenbrink, E., & Pintrich, P. (2002). Motivation as an enabler for academic success. School Psychology Review, 31, 313-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2002.12086158
  54. Liu, C., Shi, Y., & Wang, Y. (2022). Self-determination theory in education: The relationship between motivation and academic performance of primary school, high school, and college students. In 2022 3rd International Conference on Mental Health, Education and Human Development (MHEHD 2022) (pp. 923-929). Atlantis Press.
  55. Lunenburg, F. C., & Ornstein, A. C. (2011). Educational administration: Concepts and practices. Wadsworth Publishing.
  56. Maulana, R., Opdenakker, M. C., & Bosker, R. (2016). Teachers' instructional behaviors as important predictors of academic motivation: Changes and links across the school year. Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 147-156. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.07.019
  57. McInerney, D. (2019). Motivation. Educational Psychology, 39, 427-429. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1600774
  58. Mullins, L. J. (2007). Management and organizational behavior. Pearson.
  59. Okada, R. (2023). Effects of perceived autonomy support on academic achievement and motivation among higher education students: A meta-analysis. Japanese Psychological Research, 65(3), 230-242. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12380
  60. Opdenakker, M. C., Maulana, R., & den Brok, P. (2012). Teacher-student interpersonal relationships and academic motivation within one school year: Developmental changes and linkage. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(1), 95-119.
  61. Paşamehmetoğlu, A., & Yeloğlu, H. O. (2014). Motivasyon. U. Sığrı & S. Gürbüz (Ed.), In Örgütsel davranış (pp.141-165). Beta Yayıncılık.
  62. Pintrich, P. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667-686. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667
  63. Prananto, K., Cahyadi, S., Lubis, F. Y., & Hinduan, Z. R. (2025). Perceived teacher support and student engagement among higher education students-A systematic literature review. BMC Psychology, 13, 112. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02412-w
  64. Radovan, M., & Makovec, D. (2015). Relations between students’ motivation, and perceptions of the learning environment. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 5(2), 115-138.https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.145
  65. Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Örgütsel davranış. İ. Erdem (Çev. Ed.). Nobel Yayıncılık.
  66. Rutter, M. (1983). School effects on pupil progress: Research findings and policy implications. Child Development, 54, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129857
  67. Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/CEPS.1999.1020
  68. Sachau, D. (2007). Resurrecting the Motivation-Hygiene Theory: Herzberg and the positive psychology movement. Human Resource Development Review, 6, 377-393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484307307546
  69. Sahranç, Ü. (2019). Öğrenmeyi etkileyen etmenler. İ. Yıldırım (Ed.), In Eğitim psikolojisi (pp. 387-411). Anı Yayıncılık.
  70. Sanjeev, M., & Surya, A. (2016). Two-factor theory of motivation and satisfaction: An empirical verification. Annals of Data Science, 3, 155-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40745-016-0077-9
  71. Schoen, H. L., Cebulla, K. J., Finn, K. F., & Fi, C. (2003). Teacher variables that relate to student achievement when using a standards-based curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(3), 228-259. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.2307/30034779
  72. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2002). Making mathematics work for all children: Issues of standards, testing, and equity. Educational Researcher, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031001013
  73. Seifert, T. (2004). Understanding student motivation. Educational Research, 46, 137-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188042000222421
  74. Senemoğlu, N. (1987). Sınıf içi öğretmen davranışları üzerine bir araştırma. Eğitim ve Bilim, 11(64), 50-57.
  75. Şakar, N. (2012). Yöneltme, K. Celil (Ed.), In Yönetim ve Organizasyon-I (pp. 125-144). Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  76. Şensoy, S., & Sağsöz, A. (2015). Öğrenci başarısının sınıfların fiziksel koşulları ile ilişkisi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(3), 87-104. https://izlik.org/JA89FR74ZR
  77. Skinner, E., & Belmont, M. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571-581. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571
  78. Stein, M. K., Remillard, J., & Smith, M. S. (2007). Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. Frank L. Lester, Jr. (Ed.), In How curriculum influences student learning (pp. 319-370). Information Age Publications.
  79. Szilagyi, A. D., & Wallace, M. C. (1990). Organizational behavior and performance. Harper Collins Publishers.
  80. Tabancalı, E. (2014). Etkili sınıf yönetimi. H. Kıran (Ed.), In Sınıf ortamının fiziksel özellikleri (pp. 61-81). Anı Yayıncılık.
  81. Urhahne, D. (2000). Teacher behavior as a mediator of the relationship between teacher judgment and students' motivation and emotion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 73-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TATE.2014.09.006
  82. Wang, M., Haertel, G., & Walberg, H. (1993). Toward a knowledge base for school learning. Review of Educational Research, 63, 249-294. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543063003249
  83. Weiner, B. (1979). A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1), 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.71.1.3
  84. Yang, Y., & Cai, J. (2022). Profiles of PhD students’ satisfaction and their relationships with demographic characteristics and academic career enthusiasm. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 968541. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.968541
  85. Yapıcı, Ş. (2008). Öğretmen adaylarının öğrencilik anılarının analizi. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 1(2), 10-22. https://izlik.org/JA92BW44BN