Journals / International Journal of Current Approaches in Language, Education and Social Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

PUSH-IN LANGUAGE SUPPORT IN ENGLISH-MEDIUM INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLS

Pages
84–102
Publication Date
2022-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Further, the study revealed no statistically significant difference in the reported level of satisfaction with push-in between the two groups; however, when the two groups were combined, only about half of the participants reported that teachers were satisfied with push-in ELL support in their school.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The number of English-medium international schools implementing a second language acquisition instructional model using push-in language support is increasing.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With the escalation of push-in comes increased interaction between English language learner (ELL) teachers and classroom teachers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Further, the study revealed no statistically significant difference in the reported level of satisfaction with push-in between the two groups; however, when the two groups were combined, only about half of the participants reported that teachers were satisfied with push-in ELL support in their school.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:ELL Teachers · English-Medium · International schools

Abstract

The number of English-medium international schools implementing a second language acquisition instructional model using push-in language support is increasing. With the escalation of push-in comes increased interaction between English language learner (ELL) teachers and classroom teachers. This quantitative survey-based study aimed to explore ELL push-in support in the early and primary years in international schools. Within the construct of English-medium international schools, the researchers sought to investigate teacher expectations during push-in. Areas explored include language policy and the specification of teacher roles, availability of planning time, in-class expectations for ELL teachers, and teacher satisfaction with push-in. The study results revealed that slightly less than half of the participants reported having a school language policy that defined teacher roles, and approximately one-third of the participants in schools using push-in were not provided with planning time. The researchers also found statistically significant differences in the rankings of ELL teacher roles during push-in between ELL and classroom teachers. Further, the study revealed no statistically significant difference in the reported level of satisfaction with push-in between the two groups; however, when the two groups were combined, only about half of the participants reported that teachers were satisfied with push-in ELL support in their school.

🔖

Cite This Article

LEHMAN, C., WELCH, B. (2022). PUSH-IN LANGUAGE SUPPORT IN ENGLISH-MEDIUM INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLS. International Journal of Current Approaches in Language, Education and Social Sciences, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 84–102. https://ajindex.com/articles/868608

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Arkoudis, S. (2006). Negotiating the rough ground between ESL and mainstream teachers. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(4), 415-433.
  2. Baecher, L., & Bell, A. B. (2017). Opportunity to teach: Push-in and pull-out models of English learner instruction. Journal of Education and Culture Studies, 1(1), 53-68. https://doi.org/10.22158/jecs.v1n1p53
  3. Bell, A. B., & Baecher, L. (2012). Points on a continuum: ESL teachers reporting on collaboration. TESOL Journal, 3(3), 488-515. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.28
  4. Birkland, T. A. (2014). An introduction to the policy process: Theories, concepts and models of public policy making. Routledge. Bunnell, T. (2016). International schooling: Implications of the changing growth pattern. In M. Hayden & J. Thompson (Eds.), International schools: Current issues and future prospects (pp. 215-235).
  5. Symposium Books Ltd. Carder, M. (2007). Bilingualism in international schools: A model for enriching language education. Vol. 8. Multilingual Matters Ltd. Carder, M. W. (2013). Managerial impact on programmes for second language learners in international schools. http://mclanguage.tripod.com
  6. Carder, M. W. (2014). Tracing the path of ESL provision in international schools over the last four decades (Part 1). The International Schools Journal, 34(1), 85-96.
  7. Constantino, R. (1994). A study concerning instruction of ESL students comparing all-English classroom teacher knowledge and English as a second language teacher knowledge. Journal of Educational Issues of Language Minority Students, 13(1), 37-57.
  8. Creese, A. (2005). Teacher collaboration and talk in multilingual classrooms. Multilingual Matters. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon. Dove, M., & Honigsfeld, A. (2010). ESL coteaching and collaboration: Opportunities to develop teacher leadership and enhance student learning. TESOL Journal, 1(1), 3-22.
  9. Elson, N. (1997). Power, politics-and persuasion: ESL in changing times. TESL Canada Journal, 55-66.
  10. Gallagher, E. (2008). Equal rights to the curriculum: Many languages, one message. Multilingual Matters Ltd. Harper, C. A., De Jong, E. J., & Platt, E. J. (2008). Marginalizing English as a second language teacher expertise: The exclusionary consequence of No Child Left Behind. Language Policy, 7(3), 267-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-008-9102-y
  11. Harr, R., & Van Langenhove, L. (1999). Positioning theory