Journals / Environmental Research and Technology / 2022 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4

Evaluation of Bartın river water quality index and suitability as irrigation water with physicochemical parameters

Pages
357–368
Publication Date
2022-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Its total hardness value is >180 mg/L, so it is in the very hard water class.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, it was aimed to determine the water quality of Bartın River and its usability as irrigation water.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In order to evaluate the change of water quality according to the precipitation the samples were collected from 4 points in December and July months. pH, NO3, SO4, Cl-, total phosphorus (TP), chemical oxygen demand (COD), suspended solid (SS), turbidity, some cations and metals were analyzed in the collected samples.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Its total hardness value is >180 mg/L, so it is in the very hard water class.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Water quality index · irrigation water quality · sodium adsortion ratio

Abstract

In this study, it was aimed to determine the water quality of Bartın River and its usability as irrigation water. In order to evaluate the change of water quality according to the precipitation the samples were collected from 4 points in December and July months. pH, NO3, SO4, Cl-, total phosphorus (TP), chemical oxygen demand (COD), suspended solid (SS), turbidity, some cations and metals were analyzed in the collected samples. The assessment of physicochemical parameters was made according to the Surface Water Quality Regulation [1]. It was determined that SS and turbidity parameters increased after precipitation and 98% of turbidity was caused by SS. Cl-, Na+, K+, Ca+2, Mg+2, SO4-2, TP were determined higher in the dry period. Although COD, total dissolved solid (TDS), electrical conductivity (EC), NO3 were higher in the rainy season, the difference between the two periods is not much. According to the water quality index, water quality was poor at all sampling points during the rainy season. In the dry period, good quality was also determined at only 1 sampling point. COD is the parameter with the greatest effect on effective weight and water quality. Irrigation water suitability was evaluated with the indexes sodium adsorption ratio (SAR), EC, %Na, magnesium ratio (MR), Kelly index (KI), potential salinity (PS) and total hardness (TH). River water is suitable as irrigation water in both periods according to SAR, %Na, MR, KI indexes. However, since the potential salinity (PS) value is greater than 3 µeq/L at the SP4 in the dry period, it is not suitable as irrigation water. Its total hardness value is >180 mg/L, so it is in the very hard water class.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNEŞ, G. (2022). Evaluation of Bartın river water quality index and suitability as irrigation water with physicochemical parameters. Environmental Research and Technology, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4, 357–368. https://ajindex.com/articles/867912

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. . N. Al-Ansari, “Management of water resources in Iraq: perspectives and prognoses,ˮ Engineering, Vol. 5, pp. 667–684, 2013. [2]. Z. Wang, Q. Su, S. Wang, Z. Gao, J. Liu, “Spatial distribution and health risk asseSSent of dissolved heavy metals in groundwater of eastern China coastal zone,ˮ Environmental Pollution, Vol. 290, pp.118016, 2021. [3]. S.N. Sinha, D. Paul, K. Biswas, “Effects of Moringa oleifera Lam. and Azadirachta indica A. Juss. leaf extract in treatment of tannery effluentˮ, Our Nature. Vol. 14, pp. 47-53, 2016. [4]. D. Paul, S.N. Sinha, “Isolation and characterization of phosphate solubilizing bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa KUPSB12 with antibacterial potential from river Ganga, Indiaˮ, Annals of Agrarian Science, Vol. 15, pp. 130-136, 2016. [5]. N.E. Pettit, T.D. Jardine, S.K. Hamilton, V. Sinnamon, D. Valdez, P.M. Davies, M.M. Douglas, S.E. Bunn, “Seasonal changes in water quality and macrophytes and the impact of cattle on tropical floodplain waterholesˮ, Mar. Freshw. Res. Vol. 63, pp. 788–800, 2012. [6]. V. Rodrigues, J. Estrany, M. Ranzini, V. Cicco, J. Martín-Benito, J. Hedo, M. Lucas-Borja, “Effects of land use and seasonality on stream water quality in a small tropical catchment: the headwater of Córrego Água Limpa, São Paulo (Brazil)ˮ, Science Of The Total Environment, Vol. 622/623, pp. 1553–1561, 2018. [7]. S.M. Praveena, A.Z. Aris, M. Radojevic, “Heavy metals dyanamics and source in intertidal mangrove sediment of Sabah, Borneo Islandˮ, Environment Asia, Vol. 3, pp. 79-83, 2010. [8]. O. Akoto, T.N. Bruce, G. Darko, “Heavy metals pollution profiles in streams serving the Owabi reservoirˮ, African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 2(11), pp. 354–359, 2008. [9]. R. Reza, G. Singh, “Heavy metal contamination and its indexing approach for river waterˮ, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 7 (4), pp. 785–792, 2010. [10]. S.A. Abbasi, N. Abbasi, R. Soni, R. Heavy Metals in the Environment. Mittal Publications, New Delhi. 1998. [11]. R. Nicolau, C.A. Galera, Y. Lucas, “Transfer of nutrients and labile metals fromthe continent to the sea by a small Mediterranean riverˮ, Chemosphere, Vol. 63, pp. 469–476, 2006. [12]. K.M. Mohiuddin, K. Otomo, Y. Ogawa, N. Shikazono, “Seasonal and spatialdistribution of trace elements in the water and sediments of the Tsurumi river in Japanˮ, Environmental Monitoring And AsseSSent, Vol. 184, pp. 265–279, 2012. [13]. A.M. Abdel-Satar, H. Manal, A.K. Waed