Journals / Academic Review of Humanities and Social Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

CONTROLLED COLLABORATION IN ORGANIZATIONS: THE ROLE OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, PERFORMANCE AND TRUST

ÖRGÜTLERDE DENETİMLİ İŞBİRLİĞİ: BİLGİ YÖNETİMİ, PERFORMANS VE GÜVENİN ROLÜ

Pages
156–181
Publication Date
2022-12-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study we argue how knowledge management, performance management and trust may contribute to the unity of control and collaboration in organizations and accordingly develop theoretical propositions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:While the agency theory posits that the principal tries to gain maximum profits with the least costs and the agent acts in the interest of the principal only with control mechanisms, the stewardship theory argues that the agent is motivated to act in the interests of the principal therefore coordination mechanisms should be developed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:While the absence of organizational control may lead to diversion from organizational goals, too much control may harm employees' autonomy, creativity, and innovation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study we argue how knowledge management, performance management and trust may contribute to the unity of control and collaboration in organizations and accordingly develop theoretical propositions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Vekalet kuramı · Temsil kuramı · Örgütsel denetim

Abstract

While the agency theory posits that the principal tries to gain maximum profits with the least costs and the agent acts in the interest of the principal only with control mechanisms, the stewardship theory argues that the agent is motivated to act in the interests of the principal therefore coordination mechanisms should be developed. While the absence of organizational control may lead to diversion from organizational goals, too much control may harm employees' autonomy, creativity, and innovation. On the other hand, when organizations over emphasize collaboration, a relational risk may occur in work processes. So the coexistence of control and collaboration creates a dilemma for organizations. In this study we argue how knowledge management, performance management and trust may contribute to the unity of control and collaboration in organizations and accordingly develop theoretical propositions.

Özet

Vekâlet kuramı, asilin en az maliyetle azami kâr elde etmeye çalıştığını ve vekilin ise sadece denetim mekanizmaları ile asilin çıkarına hareket ettiğini öne sürerken, temsil kuramı vekilin aslında asilin menfaatleri doğrultusunda hareket etmeye istekli olduğunu ve bu nedenle işbirliği mekanizmalarının geliştirilmesi savunur. Örgütsel denetimin eksikliği, örgütsel hedeflerden sapmaya yol açarken, çok fazla kontrol de çalışanların özerkliğine, yaratıcılığına ve yenilikçiliğine zarar verebilir. Öte yandan, örgüt-içi işbirliği gereğinden fazla vurgulandığında, iş süreçlerinde ilişkisel risk ortaya çıkabilir. Bu nedenle, denetim ve işbirliğinin bir arada bulunması, örgütler için bir ikilem yaratır. Bu çalışmada bilgi yönetimi, performans yönetimi ve güven gibi değişkenlerin, örgütlerde denetimli işbirliğine nasıl katkıda bulunabileceği tartışılmış ve bu doğrultuda kuramsal önermeler geliştirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KEMİKKIRAN, N., KIZRAK, M. (2022). CONTROLLED COLLABORATION IN ORGANIZATIONS: THE ROLE OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, PERFORMANCE AND TRUST. Academic Review of Humanities and Social Sciences, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 156–181. https://ajindex.com/articles/866726

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Bendor, J., Glazer, A. & Hammond, T. (2001). Theories of delegation. Annual Review of Political Science, 4(1): 235-269.
  2. Bhattacharya, R., Devinney, T. M. & Pillutla, M. M. (1998). A formal model of trust based on outcomes. Academy of Management Review, 23(3): 459-472.
  3. Blackler, F. (1995). Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation. Organization Studies, 16(6): 1021-1046.
  4. Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley. Bogenrieder, I. & Nooteboom, B. (2004). Learning groups: What types are there? A theoretical analysis and an empirical study in a consultancy firm. Organization Studies, 25(2): 287-313.
  5. Cardinal, L. B., Sitkin, S. B. & Long, C. P. (2004). Balancing and rebalancing in the creation and evolution of organizational control. Organization Science, 15(4): 411-431.
  6. Coff, R. (2003). Bidding wars over R & D-intensive firms: Knowledge, opportunism and the market for corporate control. Academy of Management Journal, 46(1): 74-85.
  7. Cohen, M. D. & Bacdayan, P. (1994). Organization routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organization Science, 5(4): 554-568.
  8. Colletti, A. L., Sedatole, K. L. & Towry, K. L. (2005). The effect of control systems on trust and cooperation in collaborative environments. The Accounting Review, 80(2): 477-500.
  9. Collins, C. J. & Smith, K. G. (2006). Knowledge exchange and combination: The role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3): 544-560.
  10. Conner, K. R. & Prahalad, C. K. (1996). A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organization Science, 7 (5): 477-501.
  11. Coombs, R., Knights, D. & Willmott, H. C. (1992). Culture, control and competition; towards a conceptual framework fort he study of information technology in organizations. Organization Studies, 13(1): 51-72.
  12. Das, T. K. & Teng, B. S. (1988). Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23(3): 491-512.
  13. Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D. & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1): 20-47.
  14. Dickinson, H. & Sullivan, H. (2014). Towards a general theory of collaborative performance: The importance of efficacy and agency. Public Administration, 92(1): 161-177.
  15. Donaldson, L. (1990). The ethereal hand: Organizational economics and management theory. Academy of Management Review, 15(3