Journals / Academic Review of Humanities and Social Sciences / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1

Sustainability Performance of IAMU-Member Maritime Universities: A Comparative Analysis Between Türkiye and Global Context

IAMU Üyesi Denizcilik Üniversitelerinin Sürdürülebilirlik Performansı: Türkiye ve Küresel Bağlam Arasında Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analiz

Pages
30–49
Publication Date
2026-06-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings reveal that universities in Türkiye demonstrate more balanced and higher performance in the field of sustainability.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to evaluate the performance of maritime universities in the field of sustainability and to reveal the position of institutions in Türkiye in relation to global trends.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The findings reveal that universities in Türkiye demonstrate more balanced and higher performance in the field of sustainability.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study offers various recommendations to policymakers and university administrators for improving the sustainability performance of maritime universities.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sürdürülebilirlik Performansı · Denizcilik Üniversiteleri · Üniversite Sıralamaları

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the performance of maritime universities in the field of sustainability and to reveal the position of institutions in Türkiye in relation to global trends. Within the scope of the study, the Times Higher Education (THE) Impact Rankings and UI Green Metric indicators were used, based on universities that are members of the International Association of Maritime Universities (IAMU). These indicators provide a comparable data set by scoring universities' contribution levels to sustainable development goals in various areas. The positions of the identified universities in the rankings and their sustainability practices were analyzed, and the strengths and areas for improvement of maritime universities in Türkiye were discussed. The findings reveal that universities in Türkiye demonstrate more balanced and higher performance in the field of sustainability. However, the absence of many IAMU member universities in these rankings indicates that sustainability visibility is limited on a global scale. The study offers various recommendations to policymakers and university administrators for improving the sustainability performance of maritime universities.

Özet

Bu çalışma, denizcilik üniversitelerinin sürdürülebilirlik alanındaki performanslarını değerlendirmeyi ve Türkiye’deki kurumların küresel eğilimler karşısındaki konumunu ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Çalışma kapsamında, Uluslararası Denizci Üniversiteler Birliği (IAMU) üyesi üniversiteler temel alınarak, Times Higher Education (THE) Impact Rankings ve UI Green Metric göstergeleri kullanılmıştır. Söz konusu göstergeler, üniversitelerin sürdürülebilir kalkınma hedeflerine katkı düzeylerini çeşitli alanlarda puanlayarak karşılaştırılabilir bir veri seti sunmaktadır. Belirlenen üniversitelerin sıralamalardaki konumları ve sürdürülebilirlik uygulamaları analiz edilerek, Türkiye’deki denizcilik üniversitelerinin güçlü ve gelişime açık yönleri tartışılmıştır. Bulgular, Türkiye’deki üniversitelerin sürdürülebilirlik alanında daha dengeli ve yüksek performans gösterdiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Ancak IAMU üyesi pek çok üniversitenin bu sıralamalarda yer almaması, küresel ölçekte sürdürülebilirlik görünürlüğünün sınırlı olduğunu göstermektedir. Çalışma, denizcilik üniversitelerinin sürdürülebilirlik performanslarının arttırılması için politika geliştiricilere ve üniversite yöneticilerine yönelik çeşitli öneriler sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Demirtaş, S., Yalman, Y. (2026). Sustainability Performance of IAMU-Member Maritime Universities: A Comparative Analysis Between Türkiye and Global Context. Academic Review of Humanities and Social Sciences, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 30–49. https://doi.org/10.54186/arhuss.1910304

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (22)

  1. Barasa, L., Winarno, W., Herawati, S., Ashshiddiqi, H. A., Subekti, J., & Ole, A. H. (2024). Empowering maritime graduates for policy advocacy and sustainability in vocational education. 1(4), 196–211. https://doi.org/10.61132/digitalinnovation.v1i4.117
  2. Bermejo, R. (2014). Sustainable Development in the Brundtland Report and Its Distortion (pp. 69–82). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8981-3_5
  3. United Nations, Sustainable Development (13 January 2026). https://sdgs.un.org/goals.
  4. Citaristi, I. (2022). International Maritime Organization—IMO (pp. 349–353). Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003292548-72
  5. Demirtaş, S. (2025). A comparative analysis of sustainability studies conducted in higher education institutions in Turkey [Master of Science Thesis, İstanbul Gedik University]
  6. Demirtaş, S., & Özcan, A. (2025). Türkiye’deki yükseköğretim kurumlarında yapılan sürdürülebilirlik çalışmalarının karşılaştırmalı analizi. Academic Review of Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(1), 40-55.
  7. Erdem, A.R. (2013). Bilgi toplumunda üniversitenin değişen rolleri ve görevleri, Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 3(2), 109-120.
  8. Hardian, M., Fauzan, A., Taufika, R., Erlande, R., Juri, J., & Maharani R, A. (2024). Green Maritime Education: A Framework for Cultivating Ecological Citizenship and Sustainable Practices in Coastal Areas. SHS Web of Conferences, 205, 05002. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202420505002
  9. IAMU (25 April 2026). International association of maritime universities, https://iamu-edu.org/.
  10. Mindykowski, J., Charchalis, Adam., Przybylowski, P., & Weintrit, A. (2013). Maritime education and research to face the xxi-st century challenges in gdynia maritime university’s experience part i - maritime universities facing today and tomorrow’s challenges. TransNav: International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 7(4), 575–579. https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.07.04.13
  11. Nakazawa, T. (2024). An insight into IAMU activities. Časopis Pomorskog Fakulteta/Časopis Pomorskog Fakulteta Kotor, 25(2), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.56080/jms241103
  12. Purba, D., & Simanjuntak, M. B. (2024). Sustainable maritime education: Integrating environmental science for global competence. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v10i1.32588
  13. Purba, D., Manurung, E. F., Siregar, D. V., Argo, J. B., Suparma, J., Subekti, J., & Pangaribuan, H. T. (2024). exploring maritime education’s role in global trade and workforce development. 1(4), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.61132/greeninflation.v1i4.109
  14. Simanjuntak, M. B., Rafli, Z., & Utami, S. R. (2024). Enhancing maritime education for ocean sustainability: A multidisciplinary approach. BIO Web of Conferences, The 5th International Conference on Marine Science. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202410602006.
  15. Sumali, B., Cahyadi, T., Ole, A. H., Barasa, L., Manurung, E. F., & Rachman, A. (2024). Assessing the effectiveness of maritime sustainability initiatives: A qualitative study. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Management, 1(4), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.61132/epaperbisnis.v1i4.116
  16. THE. (2026, January 13). https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/methodology (Accesed: 22 April 2026).
  17. THE Latest Ranking (2026, January 13), Times higher education world university ranking, https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/latest/world-ranking (Accesed: 22 April 2026).
  18. THE Impact Ranking (2026, January 13), https://www.timeshighereducation.com/impactrankings (Accesed: 22 April 2026).
  19. Uçar, O.K. (2022). Sustainability activities and reporting in universities: a modal proposal. [Master of Science Thesis, Suleyman Demirel University}.
  20. United Nations (2026, January 25), https://sdgs.un.org/goals (Accesed: 22 April 2026).
  21. UI Green Metric World University Rankings (2026, January 25), https://uigreenmetric.com/rankings/university/overall-rankings-2025 (Accesed: 22 April 2026).
  22. Willers, B. (1994). Sustainable development: a new world deception. Conservation Biology, 8(4), 1146–1148. https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1523-1739.1994.08041146.X