SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Klinik Psikoloji Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

Relationships between different dimensions of parentification according to gender and prediction level of parentification dimensions for psychological symptoms

Cinsiyete göre ebeveynleşmenin farklı boyutları arasındaki ilişkiler ve ebeveynleştirme boyutlarının psikolojik belirtileri yordama düzeyi

Sait ULUÇ
Duygu KÖYDEN
Pages
317–330
Publication Date
2022-12-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the other hand, the model based on whom the parentification is intended for (PI dimensions) estimated 18% of the variance of psychological symptoms.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Parentification, a kind of dysfunction in the family system, is defined as a role change between parent and child.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The extent to which the scales predicted the psychological symptoms were evaluated separately.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the other hand, the model based on whom the parentification is intended for (PI dimensions) estimated 18% of the variance of psychological symptoms.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:ebeveynleşme · öz bildirim · psikolojik belirtiler

Abstract

Parentification, a kind of dysfunction in the family system, is defined as a role change between parent and child. Parentification phenomenon occurs when the child or adolescent is forced to take parental responsibilities inappropriately or earlier than the appropriate time. In this study, it was aimed to examine the relationships between the Turkish version of the Filial Responsibility Scale (FRS-A) and the Turkish version of the Parentification Scale (PI). The extent to which the scales predicted the psychological symptoms were evaluated separately. The sample of the study consisted of 197 college students (99 females and 98 males), aged between 19 and 23 (M = 21.10, SD = 1.38). Relationships between FRS and PI sub-dimensions were tested separately for women and men using Pearson's correlation analyses. The results of the analyses indicated that the relationships between the sub-dimensions of both scales were significant. Two hierarchical regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the predictive effects of the FRS-A and the PI on psychological symptoms. The results of the regression analysis indicated that the model based on the parentification type (FRS-A dimensions) estimated 22.3% of the variance of psychological symptoms. On the other hand, the model based on whom the parentification is intended for (PI dimensions) estimated 18% of the variance of psychological symptoms.

Özet

Aile sistemindeki bir tür işlev bozulması olan ebeveynleşme (parentification), ebeveyn ile çocuk arasındaki rol değişimi olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Çocuk ya da ergen uygun zamandan daha erken ya da uygun olmayan bir biçimde ebeveyn sorumluluklarını üstlenmek zorunda bırakıldığında ebeveynleşme olgusu ortaya çıkmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Filial Sorumluluk Ölçeği (FSÖ-Y) ve Ebeveynleşme Ölçeğinin (EE) arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesidir. İkinci olarak, ölçeklerin psikolojik iyilik halini yordayıp yordamadığı değerlendirilmiştir. Çalışmanın örneklemi 19 ile 23 yaş aralığında (Ort. = 21.10, SS = 1.38) 197 üniversite öğrencisinden (99 kadın ve 98 erkek) oluşmaktadır. FSÖ-Y ve EE alt boyutları arasındaki ilişkiler Pearson korelasyon analizleri ile kadınlar ve erkekler için ayrı ayrı incelenmiştir. Analiz sonuçları her iki ölçeğe ait alt boyutların birbirleriyle anlamlı ilişkileri olduğuna işaret etmiştir. FSÖ-Y’nin ve EE’nin genel psikolojik belirti düzeyi üzerindeki yordayıcı gücünü değerlendirebilmek için iki ayrı hiyerarşik regresyon analizi yapılmıştır. Regresyon analizi sonuçları ebeveynleşme türüne (FSÖ-Y boyutları) dayanan modelin psikolojik belirtilere ait varyansın %22.3’nü tahmin ettiğine işaret etmiştir. Öte yandan ebeveynleşmenin kime yönelik olduğuna (EE boyutları) dayanan model psikolojik belirtilere ait varyansın %18’ini tahmin etmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ULUÇ, S., KÖYDEN, D. (2022). Relationships between different dimensions of parentification according to gender and prediction level of parentification dimensions for psychological symptoms. Klinik Psikoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 317–330. https://ajindex.com/articles/866647

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Becker, S. (2007). Global perspectives on children’s unpaid caregiving in the family: Research and policy on “young carers” in the UK, Australia, the USA and Sub-Saharan Africa. Global Social Policy, 7, 23–50.
  2. Carroll, J. J. ve Robinson, B. E. (2000). Depression and parentification among adults as related to parental workaholism and alcoholism. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 8(4), 360–367.
  3. Champion, J. E., Jaser, S. S., Reeslund, K. L., Simmons, L., Potts, J. E., Shears, A. R. ve Compas, B. E. (2009). Caretaking behaviors by adolescent children of mothers with and without a history of depression. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 156–166.
  4. Chase, N. D. (1999). An overview of theory, research, and societal issues. N. D. Chase (Ed.), Burdened children: Theory, research, and treatment of the parentified child içinde (s. 3–33).
  5. Sage. Chase, N. D., Demming, M. ve Wells, M. (1998). Parentification, parental alcoholism, and academic status among young adults. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 25, 105–114.
  6. Dağ, I. (1991). Belirti Tarama Listesi’nin (SCL-90-R) üniversite öğrencileri için güvenirliği ve geçerliği. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 2(1), 5–12.
  7. Derogatis, L. R. (1977). SCL-90: Administration, scoring and procedure Manual-I for the Revised Version. John Hopkins Univ., School of Medicine, Clinical Psychometrics Unit. Hooper, L. M. (2007a). Expanding the discussion regarding parentification and its varied outcomes: Implication for mental health research and practise. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 29, 322–337.
  8. Hooper, L. M. (2007b). The application of attachment theory and family systems theory to the phenomena of parentification. The Family Journal, 15, 217–223.
  9. Hooper, L. M. (2009). Parentification Inventory. L. M. Hooper, Department of Educational Studies in Psychology, Research Methodology, and Counseling, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487. Hooper, L. M., Doehler, K., Jankowski, P. J. ve Tomek, S. E. (2012). Patterns of self-reported alcohol use, depressive symptoms, and body mass index in a family sample: The buffering effects of parentification. The Family Journal, 20(2), 164–178.
  10. Hooper, L. M, Doehler K., Wallace, S. A. ve Hannah, N. J. (2011). The Parentification Inventory: Development, validation, and cross-validation The American Journal of Family Therapy, 39, 226–241.
  11. Hooper, L. M., Marotta, S. A. ve DePuy, V. (2009). A confirmatory factor analytic study of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventor