SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Geosound / 2021 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 1

The Effect of Water Flow Rate on Davis Tube Tests

Davis Tüp Testlerinde Su Akış Hızının Etkisi

Mahmut Emre TAÇOĞLU
Mustafa ŞEN
Emre TOPRAK
Saruhan SAKLAR
Journal
Geosound
Pages
44–53
Publication Date
2021-12-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that with increasing water flow rate Fe recovery decreased for each studied solid rate.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The effect of water flow rate on Davis tube tests was investigated in different solid ratios using low and high magnetite content samples.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It was found that with increasing water flow rate Fe recovery decreased for each studied solid rate.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It has been shown that the chosen solid ratio does not affect the grade regardless of the water flow rate, it has an impact on the Fe recovery.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Davis tube · wet magnetic separation · water flow rate

Abstract

The effect of water flow rate on Davis tube tests was investigated in different solid ratios using low and high magnetite content samples. It was found that with increasing water flow rate Fe recovery decreased for each studied solid rate. It has been shown that the chosen solid ratio does not affect the grade regardless of the water flow rate, it has an impact on the Fe recovery.

Özet

The effect of water flow rate on Davis tube tests was investigated in different solid ratios using low and high magnetite content samples. It was found that with increasing water flow rate Fe recovery decreased for each studied solid rate. It has been shown that the chosen solid ratio does not affect the grade regardless of the water flow rate, it has an impact on the Fe recovery.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAÇOĞLU, M. E., ŞEN, M., TOPRAK, E., SAKLAR, S. (2021). The Effect of Water Flow Rate on Davis Tube Tests. Geosound, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 1, 44–53. https://ajindex.com/articles/866564

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Ahmed M. M. 2010. Statıstıcal design application and analysis of separation effıciency in Davis tube tester, Journal of Engineering Sciences, Assiut University, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 1047-1058
  2. Arol A.I., Aydogan A. 2004. Recovery enhancement of magnetite fines in magnetic separation, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects, 232, 151–154
  3. Davis, E.W. 1955. Pioneering with Taconite: The Birth of a Minnesota Industry, 269-283, Minesota Hisstorical Society Press, 2004. Haffez G.S.A. 2012. Optimization of the operating parameters affecting Davis tube magnetic tester using 2nd factorial design, Journal of Engineering Sciences, Assiut University, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp.1217-1231
  4. Murariu, V., Svoboda, J. 2003. The applıcabılıty of davıs tube tests to ore separatıon by drum magnetıc separators, Physical Separation in Science and Engineering, 12, 1, pp. 1–11.
  5. Safarik, I., Mucha, P., Pechoc, J., Stoklasa, J., Safarikova, M., 2001. Separation of magnetic affinity biopolymer adsorbents in a Davis tube magnetic separator, Biotechnology Letters 23: 851–855, 2001.
  6. Sivrikaya, O., Arol, A. I. 2012. Evaluation of low grade iron ore deposit in Erzincan-Turkey for iron ore pellet concentrate production Schulz, N.F., 1964. Determination of the magnetic separation characteristics with the Davis Magnetic Tube,Trans. SME-AIME, 229, 211–216.
  7. Svoboda, J, 2004. Magnetic Technicues for the Treatment of Materials, Kluwer Academic Publishers