Journals / Türk Doğa ve Fen Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4

An Ethnobotanical Research on Plants Used for Food Purposes in Bigadiç (Balıkesir-Turkey)

Pages
142–147
Publication Date
2022-12-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the study, more diversity was observed in the use of wild plants as food, especially in rural.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the ethnobotanical properties of the plants used by the local people for food in Bigadiç province were investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 104 resource persons, 76 men and 28 women, were interviewed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the study, more diversity was observed in the use of wild plants as food, especially in rural.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Balıkesir · Bigadiç · Ethnobotany

Abstract

In this study, the ethnobotanical properties of the plants used by the local people for food in Bigadiç province were investigated. The study was carried out in fifteen rural neighborhoods and two district markets. A total of 104 resource persons, 76 men and 28 women, were interviewed. These plants, which are used among the people, were also identified and collected in their natural environments and their herbariums were made. As a result of the research, it was determined that a total of 51 taxa belonging to 26 families in the region were used for food purposes. The first five families of plants used as food are as follows: Rosaceae (18%), Lamiaceae (12%), Cucurbitaceae (7%), Fabaceae (7%), Moraceae (7%) and others (%41). The first five genera, which are most commonly used by the public, are listed as follows: Triticum (21), Sesamum (19), Origanum (17), Portulaca (14) and Vitis (14). Mostly fruit/seed (32), leaf (17) and root/stem (3) parts of these plants are used by the public. In the study, the plants that people use as food mostly; eating in the kitchen (22), fruit and fruit juice (21), spice (7), medicinal tea (5), oil (4) and molasses/jam (3). As a result of the study, more diversity was observed in the use of wild plants as food, especially in rural.

Özet

In this study, the ethnobotanical properties of the plants used by the local people for food in Bigadiç province were investigated. The study was carried out in fifteen rural neighborhoods and two district markets. A total of 104 resource persons, 76 men and 28 women, were interviewed. These plants, which are used among the people, were also identified and collected in their natural environments and their herbariums were made. As a result of the research, it was determined that a total of 51 taxa belonging to 26 families in the region were used for food purposes. The first five families of plants used as food are as follows: Rosaceae (18%), Lamiaceae (12%), Cucurbitaceae (7%), Fabaceae (7%), Moraceae (7%) and others (%41). The first five genera, which are most commonly used by the public, are listed as follows: Triticum (21), Sesamum (19), Origanum (17), Portulaca (14) and Vitis (14). Mostly fruit/seed (32), leaf (17) and root/stem (3) parts of these plants are used by the public. In the study, the plants that people use as food mostly; eating in the kitchen (22), fruit and fruit juice (21), spice (7), medicinal tea (5), oil (4) and molasses/jam (3). As a result of the study, more diversity was observed in the use of wild plants as food, especially in rural.

🔖

Cite This Article

TANAYDIN, G., SATIL, F., ÇAKILCIOĞLU, U. (2022). An Ethnobotanical Research on Plants Used for Food Purposes in Bigadiç (Balıkesir-Turkey). Türk Doğa ve Fen Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4, 142–147. https://ajindex.com/articles/865245

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Yuen K, Ye Z, Fung S, Chan C, Jin D. SARS CoV2 and COVID 19: The most important research questions. Cell Biosci. 2020;10:1-5
  2. Kawarty AMAM., Behçet L, Çakılcıoğlu U. Traditional information on wild food crops of Ballakaati (Erbil-Northern Iraq). Afyon Kocatepe Univ J Sci Engineer. 2021;21(3):520-531
  3. Cakilcioglu U, Khatun S, Turkoglu I, Hayta S. Ethnopharmacological survey of medicinal plants in Maden (Elazig-Turkey). J Ethnopharmacol. 2011;137(1):469-486
  4. Kayabaşı Poyraz, N, Tümen G, Polat R. Ethnobotanical studies on useful plants in Manyas (Balıkesir/ Turkey) region. Biol Diver Conser. 2016;9(3):58-63
  5. Polat R, Cakilcioglu U, Satıl F. Traditional uses of medicinal plants in Solhan (Bingöl-Turkey). J Ethnopharmacol. 2013;148(3):951-963
  6. Sağıroğlu M, Arslantürk A, Akdemir ZK, Turna M. (An ethnobotanical survey from Hayrat (Trabzon) and Kalkandere (Rize/ Turkey). Biol Diver Conser. 2012;5(1):31-43
  7. Satıl F, Tümen G, Dirmenci T, Çelik A, Arı Y, Malyer H. Balıkesir Ethnobotanical Inventory Study in and Around Kazdağı National Park 2004-2006. TÜBA-KED Turkish Acad Sci J Cultural Invent. 2007;(5):171-199
  8. Selvi S, Polat R, Çakılcıoğlu U, Celep F, Dirmenci T, Ertuğ ZF. An ethnobotanical review on medicinal plants of the Lamiaceae family in Turkey. Turk J Bot. 2022;46(4):283-332
  9. Yalçın S, Akan H. Çakılcıoğlu U. Traditional uses of some medicinal plants in Suruç (Şanlıurfa-Turkey). Turk J Nature Sci. 2021;10(1):236-244
  10. Selvi S, Satıl F, Polat R, Çakılcıoğlu U. A research on medicinal plants collected from Kazdağları (Balıkesir-Edremit) and sold in herbalists in the region, Kazdağları III. National Symposium. 2012;24(26):505-513
  11. Ertug F. Contemporary plant Gathering in Central Anatolia: An Ethnoarchaeological and ethnobotanical study. In this work: Öztürk, M., Seçmen, Ö., Görk G. (edlr.). Proceedings of the 4. Plant Life in Southwest Asia Symposium, 945-962, Izmir; Ege University Press; 1996
  12. Koçyiğit M. An ethnobotanical research in Yalova province. Istanbul University Institute of Health Sciences, Master Thesis. Istanbul; 2005
  13. Yücel E, Güney F, Şengün İY. Wild plants consumed as food in Mihalıççık district, Eskişehir/Turkey, and consumption patterns of these plants. Biol Diver Conser. 2010;(3):158-175
  14. Aktan T, Altan Y. Natural ornamental plants of new City (Bursa) cemeteries. Celal Bayar Univ. J Sci. 2011;7(2):31-39
  15. Ekren E, Chorbaci OL. A study on ethnobotanical uses: the example of Rize ur