Journals / Türk Doğa ve Fen Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4

Isolation of a Novel Amylase Producing Brachybacterium paraconglomeratum Strain FAD4 and Optimization of the Enzyme Production Conditions

Pages
30–35
Publication Date
2022-12-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Lactose, galactose, and fructose were also increased the enzyme production as carbon sources.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A novel amylase producing bacterium FAD4 was isolated from the wastewater of a textile factory located in Soke (Aydın/Turkey).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The amylase production ability of gram positive, coccoidal FAD4 strain was confirmed with plate assay.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Lactose, galactose, and fructose were also increased the enzyme production as carbon sources.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Amylase · Brachybacterium · starch

Abstract

A novel amylase producing bacterium FAD4 was isolated from the wastewater of a textile factory located in Soke (Aydın/Turkey). The amylase production ability of gram positive, coccoidal FAD4 strain was confirmed with plate assay. Morphological and 16S rRNA sequence analyses revealed that FAD4 belongs to the Brachybacterium paraconglomeratum species with a sequence similarity of 99.8%. The optimal conditions for amylase production were determined as 72 h at 30 °C with supplementation of 1% starch. Optimum temperature and pH of the amylase were 50 °C and 7.0 respectively. Different starch, carbon and nitrogen sources were investigated for amylase production. A high enzyme production was observed with 1% potato starch and among nitrogen sources peptone was induced the production of amylase. Lactose, galactose, and fructose were also increased the enzyme production as carbon sources.

🔖

Cite This Article

COLAK, D. N. (2022). Isolation of a Novel Amylase Producing Brachybacterium paraconglomeratum Strain FAD4 and Optimization of the Enzyme Production Conditions. Türk Doğa ve Fen Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4, 30–35. https://ajindex.com/articles/865230

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Li S, Yang X, Yang S, Zhu M, Wang X. Technology prospecting on enzymes: application, marketing and engineering. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2012;2:1–11
  2. Gomes I, Gomes J, Steiner W. Highly thermostable amylase and pullulanase of the extreme thermophilic eubacterium Rhodothermus marinus: production and partial characterization. Bioresour. Technol. 2003;90 (2);207-214
  3. Cantarel BL, Coutinho PM, Rancurel C, Bernard T, Lombard V, Henrissat B. The Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes database (CAZy): an expert resource for Glycogenomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37;233–238
  4. Nagano N, Orengo C.A, Thornton JM. One fold with many functions: the evolutionary relationships between TIM barrel families based on their sequences, structures and functions. J. Mol. Biol. 2002;321;741-765
  5. Gupta R, Gigras P, Mohapatra H, Goswami VK, Chauhan B. Microbial α-amylases: a biotechnological perspective. Process Biochem. 2003;38;1599 – 1616
  6. Ma Y, Yang H, Chen X, Sun B, Du G, Zhou Z, et al. Significantly improving the yield of recombinant proteins in Bacillus subtilis by a novel powerful mutagenesis tool (ARTP): Alkaline α-amylase as a case study. Protein Express. Purif. 2015;114;82-88
  7. Shafiei M, Ziaee AA, Amoozegar MA. Purification and characterization of an organic-solvent-tolerant halophilic α-amylase from the moderately halophilic Nesterenkonia sp. strain F. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011;38;275–81
  8. Hussain I, Siddique F, Mahmood MS, Ahmed SI. A Review of the Microbiological Aspect of α-amylase Production. IJAB. 2013;15(5);1029-1034
  9. Sundarram A, Murthy TPK. α-Amylase production and applications: a review. J. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014; 2;166-175
  10. Collins MD, Brown J, Jones D. Brachybacterium faeciumgen. nov., sp. nov., a coryneform bacterium from poultry litter. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1988;38; 45–48
  11. Lapidus A, Pukall R, Labuttii K, Copeland A, Glavina Del Rio T, Nolan M, et al. Complete genome sequence of Brachybacterium faecium type strain (Schefferle 6-10). Stand. Genomic Sci. 2009;1;3–11
  12. Park SK, Kim MS, Jung MJ, Nam YD, Park EJ, Roh SW. et al. Brachybacterium squillarum sp. nov., isolated from salt-fermented seafood. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2011;61;1118–1122
  13. Singh H, Du J, Yang JE, Yin CS, Kook M, Yi TH. Brachybacterium horti sp. nov., isolated from garden soil. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2016;66;189–195
  14. Doukyu N, Yamagishi W, Kuwahara H, Ogino H, Furuki N. Purification and characterization o