SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 59

Development of Accountability Scale for School Counselor: Investigation of Psychometric Properties

Zeynep KARATAŞ
Yasemin YAVUZER
Özlem TAGAY
Pages
631–648
Publication Date
2020-12-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings were discussed in light of the literature and various suggestions were made.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to develop a valid and reliable accountability scale that can be used to determine the level of accountability of school counselors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study group consists of 494 school counselors, 298 women and 196 men.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings were discussed in light of the literature and various suggestions were made.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Accountability · Scale · Evidence-Based Practices

Abstract

The aim of this study is to develop a valid and reliable accountability scale that can be used to determine the level of accountability of school counselors. The study group consists of 494 school counselors, 298 women and 196 men. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was used for the construct validity of the scale. Cronbach’s Alpha internal consistency analysis and Spearman Brown two half reliability analyses were used as reliability analysis, when the results of exploratory factor analysis were examined in the study, it was seen that the scale had a structure with four factors (remedial services, developmental services, support services, preventive services) and this structure was confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis. Reliability analysis of the obtained scale also showed that the scale is reliable. The findings were discussed in light of the literature and various suggestions were made.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARATAŞ, Z., YAVUZER, Y., TAGAY, Ö. (2020). Development of Accountability Scale for School Counselor: Investigation of Psychometric Properties. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 59, 631–648. https://ajindex.com/articles/86498

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Accountability System (2017). https://www.spps.org/Page/25482.
  2. Saint Paul Public Schools. Akbulut, Y. (2010). Sosyal Bilimlerde SPSS Uygulamaları. İstanbul: İdeal Kültür Yayıncılık. American School Counselor Association. (2012). The ASCA national model: A framework for school counseling programs (3. bs.). Alexandria, VA: Author. Beesley, D. (2004). Teachers' perceptions of school counselor effectiveness: Collaborating for student success. Education, 125, 259- 270. Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (2002). Quantitative Data Analysis with SPSS Release 10 for Windows: A guide for social scientists. Routledge. Burck, H. D., Cottingham, H. F., & Reardon R. C. (1973). Counseling and Accountability: Methods and Critique. ABD: Pergamon Press Inc. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2014). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı (19. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademik Yayıncılık. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2016). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri (21. Baskı). Ankara:
  3. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. Cohen, R. J., & Swerdlik, M. E. (2015). Psikolojik Test ve Değerleme: Testlere ve Ölçmeye Giriş. (Çev. Ezel Tavşancıl) Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık. Cole, D.A. (1987). Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 1019-1031.
  4. Cook, S.C., Schwartz, A.C., & Kaslow, N.J. (2017). Evidence-based psychotherapy: Advantages and challenges. Neurotherapeutics, 14(3), 537-545.
  5. Dutar, Ş. & Karataş, Z. (2018). Hesap verebilirlik kavramı: Psikolojik danışma ve rehberlik alanına yansımaları. Ege Bilimsel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 1(1), 1-27.
  6. Fayers, P.M., & Hand, D.J. (1997). Factor analysis, causal indicators, and quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 6, 139–150.
  7. Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. Gedikoğlu, T. (2012). Yükseköğretimde hesap verebilirlik. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 2(3), 142-150. DOI: 10.2399/yod.12.019 Güven, M., & Kılıç, S. (2016). Okul psikolojik danışmanlarının kanıta dayalı psikolojik danışma ve rehberlik uygulamaları hakkındaki görüşleri. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5, 42-50.
  8. Güvenç, M. (2001). Okullardaki rehberlik faaliyetlerinin yürütülmesinde karşılaşılan güçlükler. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Niğde Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Niğde. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., & Tatham, R.L. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Hiebert, B. (1997). Integrating evaluat