Journals / Turkish Journal of Civil Engineering / 2022 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 5

Numerical Study on the Deformation Behavior of Geosynthetic-Encased Stone Columns Supporting Embankments

Pages
12617–12634
Publication Date
2022-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The optimum values of sand mat layer thickness, vertical encasement length, and geosynthetic stiffness are recommended to be used for preliminary designs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The method of encasing the stone column with a proper type of geosynthetic material is a widely used technique to provide the required lateral confinement and to avoid the dispersion of granular column material into soft clay.
📊
Key Findings & Data:At first, numerical results of three dimensional (3D) finite element model (FEM) were validated via the experimental data of previous field studies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The optimum values of sand mat layer thickness, vertical encasement length, and geosynthetic stiffness are recommended to be used for preliminary designs.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:stone column · geotextile encasement · geogrid reinforcement

Abstract

The method of encasing the stone column with a proper type of geosynthetic material is a widely used technique to provide the required lateral confinement and to avoid the dispersion of granular column material into soft clay. Along with the improved ultimate load capacity and the reduced settlement and bulging, the geosynthetic encasement preserves the easy drainage ability of stone columns. This paper presents the finite element analysis results of a hypothetical embankment on a soft soil deposit which is improved by geotextile encased stone columns and geogrid reinforced sand mat on top. At first, numerical results of three dimensional (3D) finite element model (FEM) were validated via the experimental data of previous field studies. Afterward, parametric studies were carried out on the FEM considering the effect of the sand mat thickness, the stiffness of the geosynthetic reinforcement, and the geosynthetic encasing length and encasement stiffness on both the horizontal and vertical deformation of stone columns. Settlement differences between columns and soft soil in both the short term and long term were also determined. The optimum values of sand mat layer thickness, vertical encasement length, and geosynthetic stiffness are recommended to be used for preliminary designs.

Özet

The method of encasing the stone column with a proper type of geosynthetic material is a widely used technique to provide the required lateral confinement and to avoid the dispersion of granular column material into soft clay. Along with the improved ultimate load capacity and the reduced settlement and bulging, the geosynthetic encasement preserves the easy drainage ability of stone columns. This paper presents the finite element analysis results of a hypothetical embankment on a soft soil deposit which is improved by geotextile encased stone columns and geogrid reinforced sand mat on top. At first, numerical results of three dimensional (3D) finite element model (FEM) were validated via the experimental data of previous field studies. Afterward, parametric studies were carried out on the FEM considering the effect of the sand mat thickness, the stiffness of the geosynthetic reinforcement, and the geosynthetic encasing length and encasement stiffness on both the horizontal and vertical deformation of stone columns. Settlement differences between columns and soft soil in both the short term and long term were also determined. The optimum values of sand mat layer thickness, vertical encasement length, and geosynthetic stiffness are recommended to be used for preliminary designs.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAHYAOĞLU, M. R., DOĞAN, T. (2022). Numerical Study on the Deformation Behavior of Geosynthetic-Encased Stone Columns Supporting Embankments. Turkish Journal of Civil Engineering, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 5, 12617–12634. https://ajindex.com/articles/864101

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Borges, J. and Marques, D., Geosynthetic-Reinforced and Jet-Grout Column Supported Embankments on Soft Soils: Numerical Analysis and Parametric Study. Computers and Geotechnics, 38(7):883-896, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2011.06.003 Hughes, J., Withers, N. and Greenwood, D.A., A Field Trial of the Reinforcing Effect of a Stone Column in Soil. Géotechnique, 25(1):31-44, 1975. DOI: 10.1680/geot.1975.25.1.31 Madhav, M.R. and Vanitha, L., Analysis and Design of Granular Pile Reinforced Ground. Proceedings of ATC-7 Workshop on Stone Column in Soft Deposits, Korea, Busan:1–17, 2006.
  2. Van Impe, W. and Silence, P., Improving of the Bearing Capacity of Weak Hydraulic Fills by Means of Geotextiles. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Geotextiles, Austria: Vienna:1411-1416, 1986.
  3. Raithel, M., Kempfert, H.G. and Kirchner, A., Geotextile-Encased Columns (GEC) for Foundation of a Dike on very Soft Soils. Proceedings of the 7th ICG International Conference on Geosynthetics, France, Nice:1025-1028, 2002.
  4. Murugesan, S. and Rajagopal, K., Model Tests on Geosynthetic Encased Stone Columns. Geosynthetics International, 14(6):346-354, 2007. DOI: 10.1680/gein.2007.14.6.346 Liu, H., Ng, C.W.W. and Fei, K., Performance of a Geogrid-Reinforced and Pile Supported Highway Embankment over Soft Clay: Case Study. Journal of Geotechnical and Geo-Environmental Engineering, 133(12):1483-1493, 2007. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:12(1483) Murugesan, S. and Rajagopal, K., Studies on the Behaviour of Single and Group Geosynthetic Encased Stone Columns. The Journal of Geotechnical and Geo-Environmental Engineering, 136(1):129-139, 2010. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000187 Yoo, W., Kim, B. and Cho, W., Model Test Study on the Behaviour of Geotextile-Encased Sand Pile in Soft Clay Ground. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 19(3):592-601, 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s12205-012-0473-4
  5. Murugesan, S. and Rajagopal, K. Geosynthetic-Encased Stone Columns: Numerical Evaluation. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 24(6):349-358, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2006.05.001bulging Yoo, C., Settlement Behaviour of Embankment on Geosynthetic-Encased Stone Column Installed Soft Ground - A Numerical Investigation. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 43:484-492, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.07.014 Tabesh, A. and Poulos, H., Design Charts for Seismic Analysis of Single Piles in Clay. Geotechnical Engineering, 160(2):85-96, 2007. DOI: 10.1680/geng.2007.160.2.85 Lu, Y., Abusharar, S., Zheng, J., Chen,