Journals / Alphanumeric Journal / 2017 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

Current Application Fields of ELECTRE and PROMETHEE: A Literature Review

ELECTRE ve PROMETHEE’nin Güncel Uygulama Alanları: Bir Alanyazın Taraması

Pages
229–270
Publication Date
2017-11-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, evaluation according to scenario variations, solving complex decision problems with metaheuristics, common usage of hesitant fuzzy implementations, proliferation of group decision preference, increasing the number of applications of hybrid techniques, used softwares, sensitivity analyses, two linguistic approaches taking an important place in fuzzification have been identified as remarkable results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Multi-criteria decision making techniques are widely used today.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this regard, the studies carried out in 2016 and the first four months of 2017 were scanned with the help of Google Scholar.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, evaluation according to scenario variations, solving complex decision problems with metaheuristics, common usage of hesitant fuzzy implementations, proliferation of group decision preference, increasing the number of applications of hybrid techniques, used softwares, sensitivity analyses, two linguistic approaches taking an important place in fuzzification have been identified as remarkable results.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Multi-Criteria Decision Making · ELECTRE · PROMETHEE

Abstract

Multi-criteria decision making techniques are widely used today. In this study, it was examined the current usage areas of ELECTRE and PROMETHEE, which are in the class of outranking-based multiple criteria decision techniques, in Turkey and the world. In this regard, the studies carried out in 2016 and the first four months of 2017 were scanned with the help of Google Scholar. Thus, it is aimed to put forward the latest state of development of ELECTRE and PROMETHEE, and to give an idea about their future application forms and fields. As a result, it was seen that application problems of ELECTRE and PROMETHEE in various fields was tried to remove, and designed appropriate methods for special cases in studies. Furthermore, evaluation according to scenario variations, solving complex decision problems with metaheuristics, common usage of hesitant fuzzy implementations, proliferation of group decision preference, increasing the number of applications of hybrid techniques, used softwares, sensitivity analyses, two linguistic approaches taking an important place in fuzzification have been identified as remarkable results.

Özet

Çok kriterli karar verme teknikleri günümüzde oldukça yaygın olarak kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada çok kriterli karar verme tekniklerinin üstünlük tabanlı sınıfında yer alan ELECTRE ve PROMETHEE’nin Türkiye ve Dünyadaki güncel kullanım alanları incelenmiştir. Bu bağlamda 2016 yılı ve 2017 yılı ilk dört ayında gerçekleştirilen çalışmalar Google Scholar yardımıyla taranmıştır. Böylelikle ELECTRE ve PROMETHEE’nin gelişimindeki son durumun ortaya konulması ve gelecekteki uygulama biçim ve alanları hakkında fikir verilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Sonuç olarak çalışmalarda, ELECTRE ve PROMETHEE’nin çeşitli alanlardaki uygulama problemlerinin ortadan kaldırılmaya çalışıldığı, özel durumlara uygun yöntemler tasarlandığı görülmüştür. Ayrıca senaryo farklılaşmalarına göre değerlendirme yapılması, metasezgiseller ile karmaşık karar problemlerinin çözülmesi, kararsız bulanık uygulamalarının yaygınlaşması, grup kararı tercihinin artması, hibrid tekniklerin uygulama sayısının fazlalaşması, kullanılan yazılımlar, duyarlılık analizleri, bulanıklaştırmada iki dilsel yaklaşımının önemli yer edinmesi dikkat çekici sonuçlar olarak tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Durucasu, H., Aytekin, A., SARAÇ, B., ORAKÇI, E. (2017). Current Application Fields of ELECTRE and PROMETHEE: A Literature Review. Alphanumeric Journal, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 229–270. https://ajindex.com/articles/86388

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Abdelkader Benzohra, & Noureddine, M. (2017). Multi-criteria approach for strategic planning of reverse supply chain. Decision Science Letters, 6(2), 107-116. doi:10.5267/j.dsl.2016.11.003 Adalı, E. A., Işık, A. T., & Kundakcı, K. (2016). An alternative approach based on Fuzzy PROMETHEE method for the supplier selection problem. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 4(3), 183- 194. doi:10.5267/j.uscm.2016.2.002 Agrebi, M., Abed, M., & Omri, M. N. (2017). ELECTRE I Based Relevance Decision-Makers Feedback to the Location Selection of Distribution Centers. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2017, 10. doi:10.1155/2017/7131094 Akgül, U. (2010). Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma: Uygulamalı Antropolojinin Eylem Alanı. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih Coğrafya Fakültesi Antropoloji Dergisi(24), 133-164.
  2. Aguezzoul, A., & Pires, S. (2016). 3PL performance evaluation and selection: a MCDM method. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 17(2), 87-94. doi:10.1080/16258312.2016.1176302 Akkaş, Ö. P., Erten, M. Y., Cam, E., & İnanç, N. (2017). Optimal Site Selection For A Solar Power Plant In The Central Anatolian Region Of Turkey. International Journal of Photoenergy, 1-17.
  3. Aksaraylı, M., & Pala, O. (2016). A Hybrid Multi-Objective Optimization Approach For Portfolio Selection Problem. International Strategic Research Congress Proceedings Book. Aktaş, R., Doğanay, M. M., Gökmen, Y., Gazibey, Y., & Türen, U. (2015). Sayısal Karar Verme Yöntemleri. İstanbul: Beta. Albuquerque, s. H. M., & Montenegro, M. R. (2016). PROMETHEE IV through kernel density estimation. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 45(18), 5355-5362. doi:10.1080/03610926.2014.942432 Alkan, A., Kasımoğlu, H. Ç., Çelik, C., & Aladağ, Z. (2017). AHP ve PROMETHEE Yöntemleri ile Lastik Üreticisi Bir Firma için Tedarikçi Seçimi. Sakarya Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 21(2), 261- 269. doi:10.16984/saufenbilder.284227 Almoghathawi, Y., Barker, K., Rocco, C. M., & Nicholson, C. D. (2017). A multi-criteria decision analysis approach for importance identification and ranking of network components. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 158, 142-151. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.10.007
  4. An, D., Xi, B., Ren, J., Wang, Y., Jia, X., He, C., & Li, Z. (2017). Sustainability assessment of groundwater remediation technologies based on multi-criteria decision making method. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 119, 36-46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.08.002
  5. An, D., Xi, B., Wang, Y