Journals / International Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of Some Physical and Chemical Properties of Kefir Obtained from Different Kefir Cultures and Brands of Milk

Farklı Kefir Kültürlerinden ve Süt Markalarından Elde Edilen Kefirin Bazı Fiziksel ve Kimyasal Özelliklerinin Karşılaştırılması

Pages
468–477
Publication Date
2022-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When kefirs’ CUPRAC, TPC, DPPH free radical scavenging capacity, Mg, Zn and Na concentrations are evaluated in terms of kefir culture, KC1, KC2, KC3, KC1, KC1, and KC1, had the highest values (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Abstract In this study, three different kefir cultures were using to ferment five different brands of milk samples. pH, the dry matter, ash amount, carbon dioxide (CO2) amount, titratable acidity, 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical scavenging capacity, the reducing power, the Fe(II) ions chelating capacity, the total phenolic content (TPC), copper(II) ion reductive antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC) and mineral matter contents were investigated in kefir samples and results were evaluated statistically.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Abstract In this study, three different kefir cultures were using to ferment five different brands of milk samples. pH, the dry matter, ash amount, carbon dioxide (CO2) amount, titratable acidity, 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical scavenging capacity, the reducing power, the Fe(II) ions chelating capacity, the total phenolic content (TPC), copper(II) ion reductive antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC) and mineral matter contents were investigated in kefir samples and results were evaluated statistically.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When kefirs’ CUPRAC, TPC, DPPH free radical scavenging capacity, Mg, Zn and Na concentrations are evaluated in terms of kefir culture, KC1, KC2, KC3, KC1, KC1, and KC1, had the highest values (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kefir · kefir kültürü · süt

Abstract

Abstract In this study, three different kefir cultures were using to ferment five different brands of milk samples. pH, the dry matter, ash amount, carbon dioxide (CO2) amount, titratable acidity, 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical scavenging capacity, the reducing power, the Fe(II) ions chelating capacity, the total phenolic content (TPC), copper(II) ion reductive antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC) and mineral matter contents were investigated in kefir samples and results were evaluated statistically. When kefirs’ CUPRAC, TPC, DPPH free radical scavenging capacity, Mg, Zn and Na concentrations are evaluated in terms of kefir culture, KC1, KC2, KC3, KC1, KC1, and KC1, had the highest values (p

Özet

Bu çalışmada, beş farklı marka süt örneğini fermente etmek için üç farklı kefir kültürü kullanıldı. pH, kuru madde, kül miktarı, karbondioksit (CO2) miktarı, titre edilebilir asitlik, 1,1-difenil-2-pikrilhidrazil (DPPH) serbest radikal temizleme kapasitesi, indirgeme gücü, Fe(II) iyonları şelatlama kapasitesi, toplam fenolik madde (TFM), bakır(II) iyonu indirgeyici antioksidan kapasite (CUPRAC) ve mineral madde içerikleri araştırıldı ve elde edilen sonuçlar istatistiksel olarak değerlendirildi. Kefirlerin, CUPRAC, TFM, DPPH serbest radikal süpürme kapasitesi, Mg, Zn ve Na konsantrasyonları kefir kültürü açısından değerlendirildiğinde, en yüksek değerlere sırasıyla KC1, KC2, KC3, KC1, KC1 ve KC1 olduğu bulundu (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ERYILMAZ, H., İNCE, O. K., INCE, M. (2022). Comparison of Some Physical and Chemical Properties of Kefir Obtained from Different Kefir Cultures and Brands of Milk. International Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 468–477. https://ajindex.com/articles/860041

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Akdan, C., Kınık, Ö., and İçier, F. (2020). Determination of some properties of kefir produced with buffalo milk and other milk mixtures. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Özel Sayı, 39-50. https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.775279
  2. Anonymous. (1976). Gıda maddeleri muayene ve analiz yöntemleri. T.C. Tarım Orman ve Köy işleri Bakanlığı, Gıda İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü, No: 65, 796, Ankara.
  3. Apak, R., Güçlü, K., Özyürek, M., and Karademir, S.E. (2004). Novel total antioxidant capacity index for dietary polyphenols and vitamins C and E, using their cupric ion reducing capability in the presence of neocuproine: CUPRAC method. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 52(26), 7970–7981. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf048741x
  4. Arslan, S. (2015). A review: Chemical, microbiological and nutritional characteristics of kefir. CyTA-Journal of Food, 13(3), 340–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/19476337.2014.981588
  5. AOAC, Association of Official Analytical Chemists. (1997). Official Methods of Analysis (16th ed.) Association of Official Analytical Chemists Washington DC. Bekar, O., Yilmaz, Y., and Gulten, M. (2011). Kefir ımproves the efficacy and tolerability of triple therapy in eradicating Helicobacter pylori. Journal of Medicinal Food, 14(4), 344–347. https://doi.org/10.1089/JMF.2010.0099
  6. Bensmira, M., and Jiang, B. (2015). Total phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of a novel peanut based kefir. Food Science and Biotechnology, 24(3), 1055–1060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-015-0135-7
  7. Beshkova, D.M., Simova, E.D., Frengova, G.I., Simov, Z.I., and Dimitrov, Z.P. (2003). Production of volatile aroma compounds by kefir starter cultures. International Dairy Journal, 13(7), 529–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-6946(03)00058-X
  8. Blois, M.S. (1958). Antioxidant determinations by the use of stable free radical. Nature, 181, 1199–1200. Cais-Sokolińska, D., Danków, R., and Pikul, J. (2008). Physicochemical and sensory characteristics of sheep kefir during storage. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Technologia Alimentaria, 7(2), 63–73.
  9. Dinis, T.C.P., Madeira, V.M.C., and Almeid, L.M. (1994). Action of phenolic derivatives (acetaminophen, salicylate, and 5-aminosalicylate) as ınhibitors of membrane lipid peroxidation and as peroxyl radical scavengers. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 315, 161–169.
  10. Ebrahimzadeh, M.A., Nabavi, S.F., and Nabavi, S.M. (2009). Antioxidant activities of methanol extract of Sambucus ebulus L. flower. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 12(5),