Journals / Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3

Examining the Relationship between Perception of Justice and Desire for Revenge and Betrayal

Adalet Algısı ile İntikam Arzusu ve İhanet İlişkisinin İncelenmesi

Pages
637–663
Publication Date
2022-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the analyses, it was determined that procedural and interactive justice had an effect on perceived betrayal, perceived betrayal on the desire for revenge, and desire for revenge on customer revenge behavior.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Customers who have problems in the product or service delivery of companies have a perception of various negativity due to the problems they face.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample of the study is constituted of customers aged 18 and over who have a material or moral problem with the product or service they have purchased and directly transmit their complaints to the consumer arbitral tribunal or related companies connected to this problem.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the analyses, it was determined that procedural and interactive justice had an effect on perceived betrayal, perceived betrayal on the desire for revenge, and desire for revenge on customer revenge behavior.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Adalet Teorisi · Algılanan İhanet · İntikam Arzusu

Abstract

Customers who have problems in the product or service delivery of companies have a perception of various negativity due to the problems they face. In the face of this situation, customers perceive injustice and think they are being deceived. This causes them to have a desire for revenge against the firms and even to act with the idea of equalizing the situation by harming them. In this study, the effects of the types of justice on perceived betrayal were examined to determine both how customers who felt a desire for revenge behaved and what kind of revenge behavior the customers exhibited. The sample of the study is constituted of customers aged 18 and over who have a material or moral problem with the product or service they have purchased and directly transmit their complaints to the consumer arbitral tribunal or related companies connected to this problem. Descriptive statistics, reliability analysis, validating factor analysis, and SEM analysis were used in the analysis of the data. As a result of the analyses, it was determined that procedural and interactive justice had an effect on perceived betrayal, perceived betrayal on the desire for revenge, and desire for revenge on customer revenge behavior.

Özet

Firmaların ürün ya da hizmet sunumunda problem yaşayan müşteriler karşılaştıkları sorunlar nedeniyle çeşitli olumsuzluk algısına sahip olurlar. Bu durum karşısında müşteriler adaletsizlik algılayarak aldatıldıklarını düşünürler. Bu durum onların firmalara karşı intikam arzuları beslemesine ve hatta onlara zarar vererek durumu eşitleme düşüncesiyle intikam davranışı sergilemesine neden olmaktadır. Bu araştırmada, adalet türlerinin algılanan ihanet üzerindeki etkileri incelenerek hem intikam arzusu hisseden müşterilerin nasıl davrandıkları ortaya konulmaya hem de müşterilerin ne tür intikam davranışları sergiledikleri belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Satın almış oldukları ürün ya da hizmetle ilgili olarak maddi veya manevi bir problem yaşayan ve bu problemle alakalı tüketici hakem heyetine ya da ilgili firmalara şikâyetlerini doğrudan ileten 18 yaş ve üzeri müşteriler araştırmanın örneklemini oluşturmaktadır. Verilerin analizinde tanımlayıcı istatistikler, güvenilirlik analizi, doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ve YEM analizi kullanılmıştır. Yapılan analizler sonucunda prosedürel ve etkileşimsel adaletin algılanan ihanet üzerinde, algılanan ihanetin intikam arzusu üzerinde ve intikam arzusunun da müşteri intikam davranışı üzerinde etkili olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYKUT, O. H., ERCİŞ, A. (2022). Examining the Relationship between Perception of Justice and Desire for Revenge and Betrayal. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3, 637–663. https://ajindex.com/articles/859259

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Adams, J. S. (1965), “Inequity in Social Exchange”, In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2: 267-299.
  2. Aquino, K., Tripp, T. M., & Bies, R. J. (2001), “How Employees Respond to Personal Offense: The Effects of Blame Attribution, Victim Status, and Offender Status on Revenge and Reconciliation in The Workplace”, The Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 86, No. 1: 52–59.
  3. Averill, J. R. (1983), “Studies on Anger and Aggression: Implications for Theories of Emotion”, American Psychologist, Vol. 38, No. 11: 1145–1160.
  4. Bechwati, N. N., & Morrin, M. (2003), “Outraged Consumers: Getting Even at The Expense of Getting a Good Deal”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 13, No. 4: 440-453.
  5. Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L. (1987), “Interactional Fairness Judgments: The Influence of Causal Accounts”, Social Justice Research, Vol. 1, No. 2: 199-218.
  6. Bies, R. J., & Tripp, T. M. (1996), “Beyond Distrust: ‘Getting Even’ and The Need for Revenge”, Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, (Eds. In R. Kramer & T. Tyler), Sage Publications: 246-260.
  7. Brashear, T. G., Brooks, C. M., & Boles, J. S. (2004), “Distributive and Procedural Justice in a Sales Force Context: Scale Development and Validation”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 57, No. 1: 86-93.
  8. Caldwell, C., Davis, B., & Devine, J. A. (2009), “Trust, Faith, and Betrayal: Insights from Management for the Wise Believer”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 84, No. 1: 103-114.
  9. Carlsmith, K. M., & Darley, J. M. (2008), “Psychological Aspects of Retributive Justice”, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 40: 193-236.
  10. Chebat, J. C., & Slusarczyk, W. (2005), “How Emotions Mediate The Effects of Perceived Justice on Loyalty in Service Recovery Situations: An Empirical Study”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 58 No. 5, 664-673.
  11. Cheng, S., Lam, T., & Hsu, C. H. C. (2006), “Negative Word-of-Mouth Communication Intention: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior”, Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, Vol. 30, No. 1: 95-116.
  12. Collier, J. E., & Bienstock, C. C. (2006), “Measuring Service Quality in E-Retailing”, Journal of Service Research, Vol. 8, No. 3: 260-275.
  13. Darley, J. M., & Pittman, T. S. (2003), “The Psychology of Compensatory and Retributive Justice”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 7, No. 4: 324-336.
  14. Ding, M. C., Ho, C. W., & Lii, Y. S. (2015), “Is Corporate Reputation a Double-Edged Sword? Relative Effects of Perceived Justice in Airline Service Recovery”, I