Journals / Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

An Investigation of the Associations between the Quality of Social Relationships and Smartphone Addiction in High School Students

Pages
29–40
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Social media had the highest contribution to the variance in smartphone addiction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigated the causal relationships between quality of social relationships and smartphone addiction in high school students.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Participants included 11th and 12th graders.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Social media had the highest contribution to the variance in smartphone addiction.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study investigated the causal relationships between quality of social relationships and smartphone addiction in high school students. The research used exploratory sequential mixed design and was carried out in twostages: qualitative and quantitative. In the qualitative stage, a focus group interview was conducted to examinestudents’ views on the relationship between quality of social relationships and smartphone addiction. In thequantitative stage, a survey was conducted, using questions developed from findings obtained in the qualitativestage and various measurement tools. Participants included 11th and 12th graders. Eight participants recruitedbased on smartphone use took part in the qualitative stage, while 620 students were recruited on a voluntary-basis for the quantitative stage. An interview form developed by the authors was used in the qualitativestage, while the Smartphone Addiction Scale-Short Version, UCLA Loneliness Scale-Short Form, Perceptionsof Parents Scale, and Social Self-Efficacy Scale were used in the quantitative stage. Content analysis was carried out on qualitative data, and multiple linear regression was conducted on quantitative data. The findingsrevealed that smartphone addiction was positively associated with loneliness, multipurpose smartphone use,social media, and having nothing to do, and negatively associated with perception of one’s mother, perceptionof one’s father, and spending quality time with friends. Social media had the highest contribution to the variance in smartphone addiction.

🔖

Cite This Article

BARDAKCI, S., ALKIN, S., İLHAN, T. (2022). An Investigation of the Associations between the Quality of Social Relationships and Smartphone Addiction in High School Students. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 29–40. https://ajindex.com/articles/857013

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Akın, A., Altundağ, Y., Turan, M. E., & Akın, U. (2014). The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the smart phone addiction scaleshort form for adolescent. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152(November 2015), 74-77. [Crossref] Aktaş, H., & Yılmaz, N. (2017). Üniversite gençlerinin yalnızlık ve utangaçlık unsurları açısından akıllı telefon bağımlılığı. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research Volume, 3(1), 85-100. [Crossref] Allen, J. P., Moore C. M., Kuperminc, G., & Bell, K. (1998). Attachment and adolescent psychosocial functioning. Child Development, 69, 1406-1419. [Crossref] Armum, P., & Chellappan, K. (2016). Social and emotional self-efficacy of adolescents: Measured and analysed interdependencies within and across academic achievement level. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 21(3), 279-288. [Crossref] Bae, S. M. (2015). The relationships between perceived parenting style, learning motivation, friendship satisfaction and the addictive use of smartphones with elementary school students of South Korea: Using multivariate latent growth modeling. School Psychology International, 36(5) 513-531. [Crossref] Benbir, G., Poyraz, C. A., & Apaydın, H. (2013). Diagnostic approach to behavioral or “non substance” addictions. Nobel Medicus, 9(3), 5-11.
  2. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246. [Crossref] Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness-offit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606. [Crossref] Bian, M., & Leung, L. (2015). Linking loneliness, shyness, smartphone addiction symptoms and patterns of smartphone use to social capital. Social Science Computer Review, 33(1), 61-79. [Crossref] Bianchi, A., & Phillips, J. G. (2005). Psychological predictors of problem mobile phone use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 8(1), 39-51. [Crossref] Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230. [Crossref] Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2015). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara:
  3. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. Chen, L., Yan, Z., Tang, W., Yang, F., Xie, X., & He, J. (2016). Mobile phone addition levels and negative emotions among Chinese young adults: The mediating role of interpersonal problems. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 856-866. [Crossref] Cheever, N., Rosen, L., Carrier, L