Journals / Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

An Investigation of Intrapersonal Predictors of Daily Screen Time: Is Sluggish Cognitive Tempo a Potential Predictor?

Pages
182–188
Publication Date
2022-11-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

While this study supports the existing literature that inatten- tion, hyperactivity, social, and emotional problems predict screen time, it also revealed for the first time that sluggish cognitive tempo is among the predictors of screen time as a transdiagnostic dimension.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Screen time defines the time spent in front of television, mobile phone, tablet, computer, and game consoles.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, it was aimed to examine intrapersonal predic- tors of screen time and whether sluggish cognitive tempo is among these predictors. 104 female and 60 male adolescents with mean ages of 14.39 ± 1.39 and 13.87 ± 1.96, respectively, participated in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:While this study supports the existing literature that inatten- tion, hyperactivity, social, and emotional problems predict screen time, it also revealed for the first time that sluggish cognitive tempo is among the predictors of screen time as a transdiagnostic dimension.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Screen time defines the time spent in front of television, mobile phone, tablet, computer, and game consoles. Rumination is a transdiagnostic process that has been reported to mediate problematic technology use and is closely related to sluggish cognitive tempo. Sluggish cognitive tempo is frequently associated with psycho- logical disorders known to affect screen time. In this study, it was aimed to examine intrapersonal predic- tors of screen time and whether sluggish cognitive tempo is among these predictors. 104 female and 60 male adolescents with mean ages of 14.39 ± 1.39 and 13.87 ± 1.96, respectively, participated in the study. Data on screen time and possible predictors were collected from parents and adolescents and analyzed by linear regression analysis. The mean screen time of participants was 8.05 ± 2.18 hours. Correlations between screen time and intrapersonal factors including emotional problems, prosocial behaviors, inattention, hyperactiv- ity, and sluggish cognitive tempo were found to be significant. According to the regression analysis, sluggish cognitive tempo explained 7.2% of screen time. While this study supports the existing literature that inatten- tion, hyperactivity, social, and emotional problems predict screen time, it also revealed for the first time that sluggish cognitive tempo is among the predictors of screen time as a transdiagnostic dimension.

🔖

Cite This Article

Gözpınar, N., Görmez, V. (2022). An Investigation of Intrapersonal Predictors of Daily Screen Time: Is Sluggish Cognitive Tempo a Potential Predictor?. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 182–188. https://ajindex.com/articles/856964

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Barkley, R. A. (2013). Distinguishing sluggish cognitive tempo from ADHD in children and adolescents: Executive functioning, impair- ment, and comorbidity. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 42(2), 161–173. [CrossRef] Becker, S. P., Burns, G. L., Leopold, D. R., Olson, R. K., & Willcutt, E. G. (2018). Differential impact of trait sluggish cognitive tempo and ADHD inattention in early childhood on adolescent functioning. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 59(10), 1094–1104. [CrossRef] Becker, S. P., Fite, P. J., Garner, A. A., Greening, L., Stoppelbein, L., & Luebbe, A. M. (2013). Reward and punishment sensitivity are dif- ferentially associated with ADHD and sluggish cognitive tempo symptoms in children. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(6), 719–727. [CrossRef] Becker, S. P., & Langberg, J. M. (2013). Sluggish cognitive tempo among young adolescents with ADHD: Relations to mental health, aca- demic, and social functioning. Journal of Attention Disorders, 17(8), 681–689. [CrossRef] Becker, S. P., Langberg, J. M., Luebbe, A. M., Dvorsky, M. R., & Flannery, A. J. (2014). Sluggish cognitive tempo is associated with academic functioning and internalizing symptoms in college students with and without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 70(4), 388–403. [CrossRef] Becker, S. P., & Willcutt, E. G. (2019). Advancing the study of sluggish cognitive tempo via DSM, RDoC, and hierarchical models of psychopathology. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 28(5), 603–613. [CrossRef] Blumler, J. G., & Katz, E. (1974). The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research. Sage Annual Reviews of Communication Research Volume III. Brand, M., Laier, C., & Young, K. S. (2014). Internet addiction: Coping styles, expectancies, and treatment implications. Frontiers in Psy- chology, 5, 1256. [CrossRef] Brand, M., Young, K. S., Laier, C., Wölfling, K., & Potenza, M. N. (2016). Integrating psychological and neurobiological considerations regarding the development and maintenance of specific Internet-use disorders: An Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 71, 252–266. [CrossRef] Brozovich, F., & Heimberg, R. G. (2008). An analysis of post-event pro- cessing in social anxiety disorder. Clinical Psychology Review, 28(6), 891–903. [CrossRef] Bucksch, J., Sigmundova, D., Hamrik, Z., Troped, P. J., Me