Journals / Journal of Design Planning and Aesthetics Research / 2022 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2

Participatory Design

Pages
1–12
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The main purposes of participation are to involve citizens in planning and design decision-making processes and, as a result increase their trust and confidence in organizations, making it more likely that they will work within established systems when seeking solutions to problems; to provide citizens with a voice in planning, design and decision-making in order to improve plans, decisions, service delivery, and overall quality of the environment; and to promote a sense of community by bringing people together who share common goals.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Participatory design is the involvement of people in the creation and management of their built and natural environments.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The main purposes of participation are to involve citizens in planning and design decision-making processes and, as a result increase their trust and confidence in organizations, making it more likely that they will work within established systems when seeking solutions to problems; to provide citizens with a voice in planning, design and decision-making in order to improve plans, decisions, service delivery, and overall quality of the environment; and to promote a sense of community by bringing people together who share common goals.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The techniques can be classified as awareness methods, group interaction methods, and indirect methods.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Democracy · Decision-making · Conflict Resolution

Abstract

Participatory design is the involvement of people in the creation and management of their built and natural environments. Its strengths are that it cuts across traditional professional boundaries and cultures. The activity of participatory design is based on the principle that the built and natural environments work better if citizens are active and involved in its creation and management instead of being treated as passive consumers. The main purposes of participation are to involve citizens in planning and design decision-making processes and, as a result increase their trust and confidence in organizations, making it more likely that they will work within established systems when seeking solutions to problems; to provide citizens with a voice in planning, design and decision-making in order to improve plans, decisions, service delivery, and overall quality of the environment; and to promote a sense of community by bringing people together who share common goals. A wide range of techniques is available to designers. Some of these techniques have become a standard method used in participatory processes, such as interactive group decision-making techniques that take place in workshops. At the same time, designers have effectively used field techniques such as questionnaires, interviewing, focus groups and group mapping to acquire information. In general, many of the techniques facilitate citizen’s awareness to environmental situations, and help activate their creative thinking. The techniques can be classified as awareness methods, group interaction methods, and indirect methods.

🔖

Cite This Article

SANOFF, H. (2022). Participatory Design. Journal of Design Planning and Aesthetics Research, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2, 1–12. https://ajindex.com/articles/853820

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Abelson, J., Forest, P.G., Eyles, J., Smith, P., Martin, E., and Gauvin, F.P. (2003). Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Social Science & Medicine, 57, 239-251.
  2. Atlee, T. (2003).
  3. The Tao of democracy. Cranston, RI: The Writers Collective. Bens, C.K. (1994) Effective citizen government: How to make it happen. National Civic Review, 83(1), 32-38.
  4. Billington, R.A. (1974). American’s frontier heritage. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Bordenave, J.D. (1994). Participative communication as a part of building the participative society. In Participatory Communication: Working for Change and Development, edited by S.A. White, K.S. Nair & J. Ascroft. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Brager, G., Specht, H., & Torczyner, J.L. (1987). Community organizing. Columbia University Press.
  5. Bramley, G., Dempsey, N., Power, S. and Brown, C., (2006). What is social sustainability and how do our existing urban forms perform in nurturing it? Paper presented at the Sustainable Communities and Green Futures Conference, London: Bartlett School of Planning, University College London. Brown, T.C. and Peterson, G.L. (1994). A political-economic perspective on sustained ecosystem management. In: Debano, L.F. (ed.) Sustainable Ecological Systems: Implementing an Ecological Approach to Land Management. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-247. Ft. Collins, CO: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 228-235.
  6. Colantonio, A. (2007). Social sustainability: An exploratory analysis of its definition, assessment methods, metrics and tools. 2007/01: EIBURS Working Paper Series. Oxford: Oxford Brooks University. Colfer, C.J.P., Brocklesby, M.A., Diaw, C., Etuge, P., Günter, M., Harwell, E., McDougall, C., Porro, N.M., Porro, R., Prabhu, R., Salim, A., Sardjono, M.A., Tchikangwa, B., Tiani, A.M., Wadley, R.L., Woelfel, J. and Wollenberg, E. (1999). The BAG (Basic assessment guide for human well-being). Criteria & Indicators Toolbox Series No. 5. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia. Davidoff, P. (1965). Advocacy and pluralism in planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 31:331-338.
  7. De Tocqueville, A. (1959). Democracy in America. New York: Vintage Books. Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond. London: Oxford University Press.
  8. Ehn, P. (1992). Scandinavian design: on participation and skill in P. Adler and T. Winograd (eds) Usability: Turning technologies