SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2

Katılımcı Tasarım Üzerine Çok Yönlü Düşünceler

Multiple Views of Participatory Design

Henry SANOFF
Pages
131–143
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, studies in participation conducted during the past decade have referred to such benefits as citizen empowerment, increasing social capital and promoting a sense of community.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Participatory design is an attitude about a force for change in the creation and management of environments for people.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Citizen's working towards collective outcomes, has been described as visioning, strategic planning, and deliberative democracy, all aimed at actions that shape and guide what a community is, what it does, and why it does it.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, studies in participation conducted during the past decade have referred to such benefits as citizen empowerment, increasing social capital and promoting a sense of community.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:planlama · planning

Abstract

Participatory design is an attitude about a force for change in the creation and management of environments for people. Today participatory design processes are being applied to urban design and planning as well as to the fields of industrial and information technology. Citizen's working towards collective outcomes, has been described as visioning, strategic planning, and deliberative democracy, all aimed at actions that shape and guide what a community is, what it does, and why it does it. Overall, studies in participation conducted during the past decade have referred to such benefits as citizen empowerment, increasing social capital and promoting a sense of community.

Özet

Katılımcı tasarım, insan için çevreler yaratılması ve işletilmesinde kullanılan dönüştürücü güçle ilgili bir tutumdur. Bugün katılımcı tasarım süreçleri, kentsel tasarım ve planlamaya olduğu kadar, endüstri ve bilişim teknolojisi alanlarına da uygulanmaktadır. Kentlilerin ortak sonuçlar için vizyon geliştirme, stratejik planlama yapma ve müzakereci demokrasi ortamı oluşturma çalışmaları, bunların tümü de bir "topluluk'un ne olduğunu, ne yaptığını ve bunu neden yaptığını biçimlendiren ve yönlendiren eylemleri hedefler. Bunların da ötesinde, son on yıldır yürütülen katılımcı çalışmalar, toplumsal sermayenin zenginleşmesi ve topluluk duygusu paylaşımının artırılması gibi kentlileri güçlendirici (citizen empowering) yararlar ortaya koymaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SANOFF, H. (2006). Katılımcı Tasarım Üzerine Çok Yönlü Düşünceler. Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2, 131–143. https://ajindex.com/articles/288126

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. ATLEE, T. (2003) The Tao of Democracy: Using Co-Intelligence to Create a World that Works for All, The Writers Collective, Cranston, RI. AVERY, M. (1981) Building United Judgement: A Handbook for Consensus Decision Making, The Center for Conflict Resolution, Madison, WI. BENS, C.K. (1994) Effective Citizen Government: How To Make It Happen, National Civic Review, 83(1); 32-38.
  2. BILLINGTON, R.A. (1974)
  3. American's Frontier Heritage, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York. BODKER, K., KENSING, F. and SIMONSEN, J. (2004) Participatory IT Design: Designing for Business and Workplace Realities, MIT Press,
  4. Cambridge. BOHMAN, J.F. (1996) Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy, MIT Press, Cambridge,MA. BRYSON, J.M.(1988) Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations, Jossey-Basş, San Francisco, CA. CAHN, E.S. and PASSETT, B.A.(1971) Citizen Participation: Effecting Community Change, Praeger, New York. CARSON, L. (2003) Building sustainable democracies, paper presented at Now We Are People Conference, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia. CHECKOWAY, B. (1986) Building citizen support for planning at the community level, Interdisciplinary Planning; A Perspective for the Future, Center for Urban Policy Research, New Brunswick, NJ. COHEN, J. (1997) Deliberation and democratic legitimacy, in J.F. Bohman and W. Rehg (eds.), Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, MIT Press,
  5. Cambridge, MA. CONNOLLY, W.E. (1969)
  6. The Bias of Pluralism, Atherton Press,
  7. New York. CREIGHTON, J.L. (1994) Involving Citizens in Community Decisions Making: A Guidebook, Program for Community Problem Solving, Washington, DC. DAVIDOFF, P. (1965)
  8. Advocacy and pluralism in planning, Journal of the American Institute of Planning (31) 331-338.
  9. De TOCQUEVILLE, A. 1959)
  10. Democracy in America. Vintage Books, New York. EHN, P.(1992) Scandinavian design: On participation and skill, in P. Adler and T. Winograd (eds.) Usability: Turning Technologies into Tools, Oxford University Press.
  11. FISCHER, G., GIACCARDI, E., EDEN, H., SUGIMOTO, M. and YE, Y. (2005) Beyond binary choices: Integrating individual and social creativity. Human-Computer Studies (63) 482-512.
  12. FORESTER, J. (1999) The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes, MIT Press,
  13. Cambridge, MA. GASTIL, J. (2000) By Popular Demand: Revitalizing Representative Democracy Through Deliberative Elections, University of California Press,
  14. Berkeley. GOVE, P.B. and MERRIAM-WEBSTER (1986) W