SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hukuk ve İktisat Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

THE ESTABLISHMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY OF SOCIAL CAPITAL BY INDIVIDUAL TIES

SOSYAL SERMAYENİN BİREYSEL BAĞLARLA KURULMASI VE KORUNMASI

Hülya AĞCASULU
Pages
18–31
Publication Date
2019-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

At the same time, the reciprocity concept, leading to the acceptance of ties as social capital by providing continuity, is elaborated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The fundamental aim of the study is the definition of two different social powers that enable the establishment and the sustainability of the ties among individuals in the assessment of social capital as an investment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Concerned social capital is composed of dyad relations, the dyad relations are obtained by the foundation of tie between individuals.The study firstly elaborates the interrelatedness of the tie, relation, network and social capital concepts.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:At the same time, the reciprocity concept, leading to the acceptance of ties as social capital by providing continuity, is elaborated.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İlişkiler & Ağlar · Türdeşlik · Karşılıklılık

Abstract

The fundamental aim of the study is the definition of two different social powers that enable the establishment and the sustainability of the ties among individuals in the assessment of social capital as an investment. For this purpose social capital is acknowledged as micro concept and focused on the individual gains. Concerned social capital is composed of dyad relations, the dyad relations are obtained by the foundation of tie between individuals.The study firstly elaborates the interrelatedness of the tie, relation, network and social capital concepts. Secondly homophily concept, which acts as a social magnet in the social relations and ease the connection of ties, is explained. At the same time, the reciprocity concept, leading to the acceptance of ties as social capital by providing continuity, is elaborated.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı sosyal sermayenin bir yatırım veya getiri unsuru olarak değerlendirilmesinde bireyler arası bağların kurulmasını ve bu bağların sürekliliğini sağlayan iki farklı sosyal gücün açıklanmasıdır. Bu amaçla çalışma sosyal sermayeyi mikro bir kavram olarak ele almış ve bireysel getirilerine odaklanmıştır. Bu sosyal sermaye, ikili ilişkilerden meydana gelmekte, ikili ilişkiler ise bireyler arasında bir bağın kurulmasıyla elde edilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AĞCASULU, H. (2019). THE ESTABLISHMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY OF SOCIAL CAPITAL BY INDIVIDUAL TIES. Hukuk ve İktisat Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 18–31. https://ajindex.com/articles/8530

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. (2000). Social Capital: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. In E. L. Lesser (Ed.), Knowledge and Social Capital: Foundations and Applications (pp. 89–115). USA: Butterworth - Heinemann. Agneessens, F., & Skvoretz, J. (2012). Group differences in reciprocity, multiplexity and exchange: Measures and application. Quality and Quantity, 46(5), 1523–1545.
  2. Ağcasulu, H. (2017). Sosyal Sermaye Kuramı ve Temel Bakış Açılarının Karşılaştırılması. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 8(17), 114–129.
  3. Aydemir, M. A. (2011). Sosyal Sermaye: Topluluk Duygusu ve Sosyal Sermaye Araştırması. Konya: Çizgi Kitabevi.
  4. Baker, W. E. (1992). The Network Organization in Theory and Practice. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action (pp. 397–429). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  5. Başak, S., & Öztaş, N. (2010).
  6. Güven Ağbağları, Sosyal Sermaye ve Toplumsal Cinsiyet. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(1), 27–56.
  7. Beckert, J. (2003). Economic Sociology and Embeddedness: How Shall We Conceptualize Economic Action? Journal of Economic Issues, 37(3), 769– 787. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2013). Analyzing Social Networks. London: SAGE. Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., & Labianca, G. (2009). Network Analysis in the Social Sciences. Science, 323(5916), 892–895.
  8. Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H. R., & Tsai, W. (2004). Taking Stock of Networks and Organizations: a Multilevel Perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 795–817.
  9. Centola, D., & van de Rijt, A. (2015). Choosing your network: Social preferences in an online health community. Social Science & Medicine, 125, 19–31.
  10. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Social Forces, 69(2), 993. Coleman, J. S. (2000). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. In E. L. Lesser (Ed.), Knowledge and Social Capital: Foundations and Applications (pp. 43–68). USA: Butterworth - Heinemann. Freeman, R., & Huang, W. (2015). Collaborating With People Like Me: Ethnic co-authorship within the US. Journal of Labor Economics, 33(1), 289–318.
  11. Field, J., (2006), Sosyal Sermaye. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  12. Gladwell, M. (2000). The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make A Big Difference. New York: Little Brown. Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–178.
  13. Hennig, M., Brandes, U., Pfeffer,