SavedAdd your journal

Journals / HRÜ Uluslararası Diş Hekimliği ve Oral Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

Anatomic variations and lesions in mandibular first molar region detected with cone beam computerized tomography

Faruk ÖZTEKİN
Tuba TALO YILDIRIM
Osman ATAŞ
Melek Didem TOZUM
Pages
87–94
Publication Date
2022-08-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There were significant associations between age and SF depth, PBL, FD, PA status at both right and left sides (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the submandibular fossa (SF) depth, periodontal bone loss (PBL), furcation defects (FD) and periapical (PA) status in mandibular first molar region with cone beam computerized tomography.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: The retrospective study consisted of CBCT images of 402 mandibular posterior regions from 201 patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There were significant associations between age and SF depth, PBL, FD, PA status at both right and left sides (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anatomy · radiology · CBCT

Abstract

Background: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the submandibular fossa (SF) depth, periodontal bone loss (PBL), furcation defects (FD) and periapical (PA) status in mandibular first molar region with cone beam computerized tomography. Materials and Methods: The retrospective study consisted of CBCT images of 402 mandibular posterior regions from 201 patients. The CBCT scans were assessed to detect the prevalence of SF depth, PBL, FD and periapical status. X2-test was used to detect whether there were significant differences in the prevalence of PBL, PA status, FD, and SF by gender and by age, by occlusion. Pearson’s coefficient was applied to evaluate the correlation between variables. Result: 90 females, 111 males, mean age of 30.5213.08) were examined. There were significant associations between age and SF depth, PBL, FD, PA status at both right and left sides (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZTEKİN, F., YILDIRIM, T. T., ATAŞ, O., TOZUM, M. D. (2022). Anatomic variations and lesions in mandibular first molar region detected with cone beam computerized tomography. HRÜ Uluslararası Diş Hekimliği ve Oral Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 87–94. https://ajindex.com/articles/852265

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. White SC, Pharoah MJ. The evolution and application of dental maxillofacial imaging modalities. Dent Clin North Am 2008; 52(4):689-705
  2. Erickson M, Caruso J, Leggitt L. Newtom QR-DVT 9000 imaging used to confirm a clinical diagnosis of iatrogenic mandibular nerve paresthesia. J Calif Dent Assoc 2003; 31(11):843-5
  3. Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc 2006; 72(1):75-80
  4. Borahan APMO, Pekiner FN. Assesment of submandibular fossa depth using cone beam computed tomography. Therapy 2018; 14(2):51-6
  5. Sato S, Arai Y, Shinoda K, Ito K. Clinical application of a new cone-beam computerized tomography system to assess multiple two-dimensional images for the preoperative treatment planning of maxillary implants. Quintessence Int 2004; 35(7):525-8
  6. Ito K, Gomi Y, Sato S, Arai Y, Shinoda K. Clinical application of a new compact CT system to assess 3‐D images for the preoperative treatment planning of implants in the posterior mandible: A case report. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12(5):539-42
  7. Cattabriga M, Pedrazzoli V, Wilson Jr TG. The conservative approach in the treatment of furcation lesions. Periodontol 2000 2000; 22(1):133-53
  8. Nakata K, Naitoh M, Izumi M, Inamoto K, Ariji E, Nakamura H. Effectiveness of dental computed tomography in diagnostic imaging of periradicular lesion of each root of a multirooted tooth: a case report. J Endod 2006; 32(6):583-7
  9. Patel S, Dawood A, Ford TP, Whaites E. The potential applications of cone beam computed tomography in the management of endodontic problems. Int Endod J 2007; 40(10):818-30
  10. Low KM, Dula K, Bürgin W, von Arx T. Comparison of periapical radiography and limited cone-beam tomography in posterior maxillary teeth referred for apical surgery. J Endod 2008; 34(5):557-62
  11. Parnia F, Fard EM, Mahboub F, Hafezeqoran A, Gavgani FE. Tomographic volume evaluation of submandibular fossa in patients requiring dental implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 109(1):e32-e6
  12. Yildirim TT, Güncü GN, Colak M, Tözüm TF. The Relationship between Maxillary Sinus Lateral Wall Thickness, Alveolar Bone Loss, and Demographic Variables: A Cross-Sectional Cone-Beam Computerized Tomography Study. Med Princ Pract 2019; 28(2):109-14
  13. Zhang W, Foss K, Wang B-Y. A retrospective study on molar furcation assessment via clinical detection, intraoral radiography and cone beam computed tomography. BMC or