SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Teknolojik Bilimler Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3

Comparative Analysis of Geothermal Powered Organic Rankine Cycle for Supercritical Fluids

Evaluation of Transcritical Rankine Cycle Driven by Low-Temperature Geothermal Source for Different Supercritical Working Fluids

Önder KIZILKAN
Pages
155–169
Publication Date
2019-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results show that the highest power generation rate is calculated for the cycle using R170 with 6125 kW, followed by R744.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Turkey's energy consumption has risen in conjunction with its economic growth over the past decades.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, approximately 70 % of the electricity demand is supplied by fossil-based fuels, which are mainly imported from other countries.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results show that the highest power generation rate is calculated for the cycle using R170 with 6125 kW, followed by R744.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Geothermal energy · Transcritical Rankine cycle · Supercritical fluid

Abstract

Turkey's energy consumption has risen in conjunction with its economic growth over the past decades. However, approximately 70 % of the electricity demand is supplied by fossil-based fuels, which are mainly imported from other countries. Thus, it became very important for the country to find alternative ways of meeting the energy requirement. Due to its geographical position, the renewable energy potential of Turkey is fairly well, which is currently contributing to the energy generation but not at the desired level. One of them is the geothermal energy that Turkey has many geothermal areas, and they are relatively appropriate for electricity production. This study aims to investigate the performance of a geothermal based transcritical Rankine cycle for various supercritical working fluids. The geothermal reservoir is located in the west part of Turkey, and the geothermal water temperature is about 156 °C. Using the actual data, comparative thermodynamic analyses are carried out for determining the best working fluid. Results show that the highest power generation rate is calculated for the cycle using R170 with 6125 kW, followed by R744. In addition, the highest irreversibility is calculated for R125 with an exergy destruction rate of 8397 kW.

Özet

Turkey's energy consumption has risen in conjunction with its economic growth over the past decades. However, approximately 70 % of the electricity demand is supplied by fossil-based fuels, which are mainly imported from other countries. Thus, it became very important for the country to find alternative ways of meeting the energy requirement. Due to its geographical position, the renewable energy potential of Turkey is fairly well, which is currently contributing to the energy generation but not at the desired level. One of them is the geothermal energy that Turkey has many geothermal areas, and they are relatively appropriate for electricity production. This study aims to investigate the performance of a geothermal based transcritical Rankine cycle for various supercritical working fluids. The geothermal reservoir is located in the west part of Turkey, and the geothermal water temperature is about 156 °C. Using the actual data, comparative thermodynamic analyses are carried out for determining the best working fluid. Results show that the highest power generation rate is calculated for the cycle using R170 with 6125 kW, followed by R744. In addition, the highest irreversibility is calculated for R125 with an exergy destruction rate of 8397 kW.

🔖

Cite This Article

KIZILKAN, Ö. (2019). Comparative Analysis of Geothermal Powered Organic Rankine Cycle for Supercritical Fluids. Uluslararası Teknolojik Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3, 155–169. https://ajindex.com/articles/847382

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. ASHRAE (2009). Ashrae Handbook Fundamentals. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, 880pp. Babatunde A.F., Sunday, O.O. (2018). A Review of Working Fluids for Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) Applications. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 413, 012019.
  2. Bandean, D.C., Smolen, S., Cieslinski, J.T. (2011). Working fluid selection for Organic Rankine Cycle applied to heat recovery systems. World Renewable Energy Congress, 8-13 May 2011, Linköping Sweeden, 772-779.
  3. Bejan, A. (1997). Advanced Engineering Thermodynamics. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA. Cengel, Y.A., Boles, M.A. (2006). Thermodynamics: an engineering approach. McGraw-Hill, New York, Dincer, I., Rosen, M.A. (2007). Exergy: Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development. Elsevier Science. Heberle, F., Hofer, M., Brüggemann, D. (2017a). A Retrofit for Geothermal Organic Rankine Cycles based on Concentrated Solar Thermal Systems. Energy Procedia. 129, 692-699.
  4. Heberle, F., Hofer, M., Ürlings, N., Schröder, H., Anderlohr, T., Brüggemann, D. (2017b). Techno-economic analysis of a solar thermal retrofit for an air-cooled geothermal Organic Rankine Cycle power plant. Renewable Energy, 113, 494-502
  5. Jumel, S., Feidt, M., Le, V.L., Kheiri, A. (2012). Working fluid selection and performance comparison of subcritical and supercritical organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for low temperature waste heat recovery. ECEEE 2012 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Industry, 559-569.
  6. Kajurek, J., Rusowicz, A., Grzebielec, A., Bujalski, W., Futyma, K., Rudowicz, Z. (2019). Selection of refrigerants for a modified organic Rankine cycle. Energy, 168, 1-8.
  7. Karellas, S., Schuster, A. (2008). Supercritical Fluid Parameters in Organic Rankine Cycle Applications. Int. J. of Thermodynamics, 11(3), 101-108.
  8. Klein, S.A. (2018). Engineering Equation Solver. (EES). F-Chart. Liu, B.T., Chien, K.H., Wang, C.C. (2004). Effect of working fluids on organic Rankine cycle for waste heat recovery. Energy, 29(8), 1207-1217.
  9. Moloney, F., Almatrafi, E., Goswami, D.Y. (2017). Working fluid parametric analysis for regenerative supercritical organic Rankine cycles for medium geothermal reservoir temperatures. Energy Procedia, 129, 599-606.
  10. Radulovic, J. (2015). Utilisation Of Fluids With Low Global Warming Potential In Supercritical Organic Rankine Cycle. Journal of Thermal Engineering, 1( 1), 24-30.
  11. Schuster, A., Karellas, S., Aumann, R. (2010). Efficiency optimization potential in supercritical Organic Rankine Cycle