Journals / Tıp Fakültesi Klinikleri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 3

An unusual complication of ıntrauterine Device

Rahim içi Araç ile ilgili Nadir Görülen Bir Komplikasyon

Pages
45–47
Publication Date
2018-11-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We suggest that the patient shouldbe counseled on self-maintenance and checking for the threads one month after insertion andregularly thereafter.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We present a case of an unusual complication of intrauterine device (IUD).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Uterine perforationsare among the most serious complications associated with the insertion of an intrauterine device.In this case, the perforation involved the cervical wall and it was asymptomatic for a period ofunknown time.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We suggest that the patient shouldbe counseled on self-maintenance and checking for the threads one month after insertion andregularly thereafter.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Histeroskopi · rahim içi araç · Uterin perforasyon

Abstract

We present a case of an unusual complication of intrauterine device (IUD). Uterine perforationsare among the most serious complications associated with the insertion of an intrauterine device.In this case, the perforation involved the cervical wall and it was asymptomatic for a period ofunknown time. Inadequate pelvic examination before insertion and inexperience of the insertingperson might be predisposing factors for uterine perforation. We suggest that the patient shouldbe counseled on self-maintenance and checking for the threads one month after insertion andregularly thereafter.

Özet

Rahim içi araç,3 ile ilgili nadir görülen bir komplikasyonu sunduk. Rahim içi araç ile ilgilien ciddi komplikasyon, uterin perforasyondur. Bu vakada perforasyon servikal kanal duvarınadoğru olmuş ve ne zaman olduğu bilinmemektedir. Yetersiz pelvik muayene ve işlemi uygulayankişinin yeterince deneyimli olmaması perforasyon oluşma riskini arttırmaktadır. Bizce en önemlişey, kadının rahim içi aracı uyguladıktan sonra düzenli aralıklarla kendi kendine muayene ilearacı belli aralıklarla kontrol etmesidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ULUSoY, N., DAĞDEViREN, H. (2018). An unusual complication of ıntrauterine Device. Tıp Fakültesi Klinikleri Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 3, 45–47. https://ajindex.com/articles/844643

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Ozgun MT, Batukan C, Serin IS, et al. Surgical management of intra-abdominal mislocated intrauterine devices. Contraception 2007; 75: 96- 100
  2. Velazquez Velasco JR, Vilchis Nava P, Nevarez Bernal RA, et al. Uterine and jejunum perforation due to intrauterine device. A report of a case and literature review. Gynecol Obstet Mex 2006; 74: 435-438
  3. Medina TM, Hill DA, Dejesus S, et al. IUD removal with colonoscopy: a case report. J Reprod Med 2007; 50: 547-549
  4. Bowen-Simpkins P. Missing IUD fragment. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2004; 30: 276
  5. Chen CP and Hsu TC. Ileal penetration by a Multiload-Cu 375 intrauterine contraceptive device. A case report with review of the literature. Contraception 1998; 58: 295-304
  6. Stuckey A, Dutreil P, Aspuru E, et al. Symptomatic cecal perforation by an intrauterine device with appendectomy removal. Obstetric Gynecology 2005; 105:1239-1241.