Journals / Nubihar Akademi / 2021 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 15

Some Transmission Problems from Sorani Kurdish to Kurmanji Kurdish

Pages
67–108
Publication Date
2021-09-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On this basis, this article suggests that there is a special importance of intra-language borrowing words for the integration of Kurdish dialects, but in this borrowing prosses, the borrowed words should be used as original and avoid linguistic confusion.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Kurmanji and Sorani, as the two main dialects of Kurdish, have been in the process of self-revival for hundreds of years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Since then, due to some political conditions, Sorani has gained more opportunities for development than Kurmanji and has become a source dialect for new words and Kurmanji has borrowed many words from it.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On this basis, this article suggests that there is a special importance of intra-language borrowing words for the integration of Kurdish dialects, but in this borrowing prosses, the borrowed words should be used as original and avoid linguistic confusion.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sorani · Kurmanji · borrowing

Abstract

Kurmanji and Sorani, as the two main dialects of Kurdish, have been in the process of self-revival for hundreds of years. Although these two dialects were written side by side in the same magazines and newspapers in Istanbul in modern times, they became distant from each other after the collapse of the Ottoman state and the break-up of the Kurds. Since then, due to some political conditions, Sorani has gained more opportunities for development than Kurmanji and has become a source dialect for new words and Kurmanji has borrowed many words from it. But due to distance and lack of direct communication some of these words are mis-borrowed. This article focuses on these misinterpretations and deals with the semantic, morphological and phonological confusions. On the other hand, it draws attention to some words that have been coined in Sorani, but are currently only used in Kurmanji, and they are also known as another problem of borrowing. To illustrate this point, we benefited from the main Kurdish dictionaries and important books, magazines and newspapers written in Kurmanji and Sorani dialects in which these words were used for the first time. On this basis, this article suggests that there is a special importance of intra-language borrowing words for the integration of Kurdish dialects, but in this borrowing prosses, the borrowed words should be used as original and avoid linguistic confusion.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERGÜN, Z. (2021). Some Transmission Problems from Sorani Kurdish to Kurmanji Kurdish. Nubihar Akademi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 15, 67–108. https://ajindex.com/articles/840839

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Akin, S. (2013). Lêkolînên Zimannasîya Kurdî. İstanbul: Avesta. Amêdî, S. B. (2012). Rêzimana Kurdî Kurmanciya Jorî û Jêrî ya Hevberkirî. İstanbul: Dîwan. Anter, M. (2012). Ferhanga Khurdî – Tirkî. İstanbul:
  2. Yeni Matbaa. Arif, T. (1944). “Şêwey Wergirtin”. Gelawêj. h. 7, r. 20-22.
  3. Baran, B. (2014). Derb. İstanbul:
  4. Avesta. Barnas, R. (1989). “Ferhengoka Dîwana Melayê Cizîrî”. Kurmancî. h. 4, r. 21-22.
  5. Barnas, R. (1989). “Lêkerên Hevedudanî”. Kurmancî. h. 5, r. 32-36.
  6. Barnas, R. (1990). “Termên Edebî”. Kurmancî. h. 7, r. 52-55.
  7. Barnas, R. (2013). Kadiz. İstanbul: Nûbihar. Bedir-Xan, C. A (1932). “Ji Kurdî li Erebî Tefsîru’l-mufredatî’l-Kurdîyye bî’l-Luxetî’l-Erebîyye”. Hawar. h. 6, r. 5-6.
  8. Bedir-Xan, C. A. (1932). “Bi Hinceta Pîroznamekê”, Hawar. h. 3, r. 4-5.
  9. Bedir-Xan, C. A. (1933). “Qurd û Qurdistan Bi Çavê Bîyanîyan”. Hawar. h. 19, r. 1-2.
  10. Bedir-Xan, C. A. (2009). Ferheng (Kurdî – Kurdî), İstanbul Avesta. Bedir-Xan, Q. A. (1932). Dilê Qurên Min. Şam: Çapxana Terekî. Bedir-Xan, K. (1971). Rêzana Zmanê Kurdî. Paris. Bengîne. (1942). “Sikalay Por û Kew”. Hawar. h. 45, r. 9. Bêkes, Ş. (2006). Dîwanî Şêrko Bêkes. Kurdistan. Bile. (1939). “Xwêndewaranî Xoşewîst”. Gelawêj. h. 1, r. 1-2.
  11. Bozarslan, M. E. (2008). Baxçê Zimên Cildê Pêşîn A-G. Amed: Weşanên Deng. Calhoun, C. (2012). Millîyetçilik. Bilgen Sütçüoğlu (Çev.). İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  12. Chyet, M. L. (2003). Kurdish-English Dictionary Ferhenga Kurmancî-Inglîzî. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
  13. Chyet, M. L. (2020). Ferhenga Birûskî Kurmancî-Îngilîzî Volume 2 M-Z. Transnational Press London. Demîrhan, U. (2007). Ferhenga Destî. Doğubeyazıt-Ağrı: Sewad. Dizeyî, H. (2012). “Prosey Ledayîkbûnî Zimanî Standard Keysî Soranî”. Govarî Ekadîmî Kowarî Korrî Zanyarî Kurdistan. h. 23, r. 17-44. Ehmed, Î. (1945). “Bo Zanîn”. Gelawêj. h. 5, r. 4. Eyn. “Nûsînêkî Rewan û Bêqurtim Lêy Ewêt”. Gelawêj. 3 (1940): 1-8. Farqînî, Z. (2010). Ferhenga Kurdî-Tirkî. İstanbul: Weşanên Enstîtuya Kurdî ya Stenbolê. Fereveşî, B. (1381). Ferhengê Farsî be Pehlewî. Têhran: Muesseseê Intişaratê Danişgahê Têhran. Fetah, Ş. (1932). “Hawar”. Hawar. h. 6, r. 1-2. Fexrî, N. (1973). “Paşgir û Pêşgirî (ve- yan –we) le Zimanî Kurdî da”, Govarî Korrî Zanyarî Kurd. Bergî Yekem-Beşî Yekem, r. 234-273.
  14. French Dictionary Plus Grammer. (2001). Great Britain: Harper Collins Publishers. Goran, (1934). “Hellbestî Derûnî”. Dîyarî Lawan. r. 36-37.
  15. Goran, E. (1389). Dîwanî Goran. Tihran: Billawkirawey Panîz. Grûba Xebate ya