Journals / Journal of Engineering and Technology / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

The Effects of Different Formaldehyde Fumigation for Broiler Hatching Eggs on Hatching Results

Pages
14–18
Publication Date
2020-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

At the end of the study, increasing the formaldehyde fumigation level decreased the hatching performance and increased the late period mortality rate.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, different concentrations of formaldehyde fumigation to broiler hatching eggs effects on hatching results were investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the experiment, 1000 broiler hatching eggs were used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:At the end of the study, increasing the formaldehyde fumigation level decreased the hatching performance and increased the late period mortality rate.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Formaldehyde · hatching · egg

Abstract

In this study, different concentrations of formaldehyde fumigation to broiler hatching eggs effects on hatching results were investigated. In the experiment, 1000 broiler hatching eggs were used. Formaldehyde fumigation treatments for the disinfection of hatching eggs in the study 1. for formaldehyde group; 3x: 42 ml formalin (40%) + 21 g potassium permanganate for 1m3, 2. for the formaldehyde group; 4x: It has been planned as 56 ml formalin (40%) + 28 g potassium permanganate for 1 m3. At the end of the study, increasing the formaldehyde fumigation level decreased the hatching performance and increased the late period mortality rate.

🔖

Cite This Article

TEZCAN, Z., ÇELEN, M. (2020). The Effects of Different Formaldehyde Fumigation for Broiler Hatching Eggs on Hatching Results. Journal of Engineering and Technology, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 14–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/835587

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Lancaster, J.E., W.E. Crabb, (1953). Studies on disinfection of eggs and incubators: I. The survival of Salmonella pullorum, thompson and typhi-murium on the surface of the hen's egg and on incubator debris. Br. Vet. J. 109, 139-148
  2. Proudfoot, F. G. And Stewart D. K. R. (1970). Effect of pre.ıncubatıon fumıgatıon w-ıth formaldehyde on the ııatchabılıty of chıcken eggs. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 50: 453-465 [3] Altan, Ö., Gönül, Ş., Altan, A., (1996). Bazı Ticari Dezenfektanların ve Formaldehit Fumigasyonunun Antimikrobiyal Aktiviteleri, Kabuk Geçirgenliği Ve Çıkış Gücü Üzerine Etkileri. E.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. C:33, S22, S:57-64
  3. Cadirci S. (2009). Disinfection of hatching eggs by formaldehyde fumigation – a review. Archiv für ÜR Geflügelkunde, 73, 116-123 [5] Yildirim I, Özsan M, Yetisir R (2003). The use of oregano (origanum vulgare L) essential oil as alternative hatching egg disinfectant versus formaldehyde fumigation in quails (coturnix coturnix japonica) eggs. Revue Méd. Vét., 154, 5, 367-370
  4. Blair A, Stewart PA, Hoover RN. (1990). Mortality from lung cancer among workers employed in formaldehyde industries, Am J Ind Med, 17, 683-699
  5. Smith, A.E (1992). Formaldehyde. Occup Med, 42, 83-88
  6. Usanmaz SE, Akarsu ES, Vural N. (2002). Neurotoxic effects of acute and subacute formaldehyde exposures in mice, Envir Toxicol Pharmacol, 11, 93-100
  7. Yıldırım, İ. Ve Yetişir, R. (1999). Kuluçkalık Yumurtaların Etken Maddeleri Farklı Dezenfektanlarla Dezenfeksiyonunun Yumurta Kabuk Antimikrobiyal Aktivitesi, Embriyo Gelişimi, Çıkış Gücü ve Çıkım Sonrası Gelişme Üzerine Etkileri. Selçuk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(19) 78-91
  8. Sheldon, B. W. and Brake, J. (1991). Hydrogen peroxide as an alternative hatching egg disinfection. Poultry Sci., 70, 1092- 1098
  9. Elibol O, Uysal A, Ertas S. (2003). Kuluçkalik yumurtalara inkübasyon öncesi farkli konsantrasyon ve sürelerde uygulanan formaldehit fumigasyonunun kuluçka özelliklerine etkisi. Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(1):9-12.