Journals / Journal of Engineering and Technology / 2025 / Volume: 6 Issue: 2

A Study on the Views of Energy Sector Executives on UN Sustainable Development Goals

Caner Tekin(İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İŞLETME FAKÜLTESİ, İŞLETME (DR))
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These findings underscore the need for targeted executive training, policy support, and strategic institutional collaborations to enhance the integration of sustainability practices within energy-based organizations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigates the perceptions and implementation levels of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) among energy sector executives in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A quantitative research design was employed, involving a survey administered to 100 energy sector executives across various firms.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These findings underscore the need for targeted executive training, policy support, and strategic institutional collaborations to enhance the integration of sustainability practices within energy-based organizations.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sustainable Development Goals · Engineering Management · Managerial Awareness

Abstract

This study investigates the perceptions and implementation levels of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) among energy sector executives in Turkey. As the energy industry plays a pivotal role in achieving global sustainability targets, understanding executive awareness and organizational practices is of critical importance. A quantitative research design was employed, involving a survey administered to 100 energy sector executives across various firms. The results revealed that while 85% of the participants reported being aware of the SDGs, only 40% stated that their organizations actively implement strategies aligned with these goals. The most implemented goals were found to be Goal 9 (Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure) and Goal 13 (Climate Action), whereas socially oriented goals such as Goal 1 (No Poverty) and Goal 4 (Quality Education) had significantly lower implementation rates. Statistical analysis using Chi-square and independent samples t-tests confirmed a significant relationship between awareness and implementation levels (p < 0.05). These findings underscore the need for targeted executive training, policy support, and strategic institutional collaborations to enhance the integration of sustainability practices within energy-based organizations.

🔖

Cite This Article

Tekin, C. (2025). A Study on the Views of Energy Sector Executives on UN Sustainable Development Goals. Journal of Engineering and Technology, Volume: 6 Issue: 2. https://ajindex.com/articles/1592162

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  2. Baumgartner, R. J., & Rauter, R. (2017). Strategic perspectives of corporate sustainability management to develop a sustainable organization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.146
  3. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
  4. Ditlev-Simonsen, C. D., & Midttun, A. (2011). What motivates managers to pursue corporate responsibility? A survey among key stakeholders. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18(1), 25-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.239
  5. Engert, S., Rauter, R., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2016). Exploring the integration of corporate sustainability into strategic management: A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2833-2850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.031
  6. Epstein, M. J., & Buhovac, A. R. (2014). Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental, and economic impacts (2nd ed.). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  7. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  8. Kiron, D., Unruh, G., & Reeves, M. (2013). Corporate sustainability at a crossroads. MIT Sloan Management Review, 54(4), 69-74.
  9. Lozano, R. (2013). Are companies planning their organizational changes for corporate sustainability? An analysis of three case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 9-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.021
  10. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda Yılmaz, B., & Öztürk, A. (2020). Sürdürülebilir kalkınma hedeflerinin özel sektörde uygulanması: Türkiye'de mühendislik firmaları örneği. İşletme ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11(4), 231-245. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2020.1031