Journals / Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting / 2016 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3

EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF INTERACTION BETWEEN PROMOTION EXPENDITURES AND TOURISM: THE CASE OF TURKEY

Pages
201–208
Publication Date
2016-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results also indicate that there is no causal relationship between tourism promotion expenditures and tourism revenue.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Turkish tourism sector is among the first places in international markets in terms of number of visiting tourists.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The Ministry of Culture and Tourism arranges promotional activities in different regions of the world to increase the number of tourists and revenue of tourism sector.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results also indicate that there is no causal relationship between tourism promotion expenditures and tourism revenue.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Tourism · tourism demand · promotion expenditure

Abstract

The Turkish tourism sector is among the first places in international markets in terms of number of visiting tourists. But the same situation is not valid in terms of tourism revenue. At this point, tourism promotion becomes important for the Turkish economy. The Ministry of Culture and Tourism arranges promotional activities in different regions of the world to increase the number of tourists and revenue of tourism sector. But it is possible to interpret that tourism demand is not sufficient compare to potential of the country because of absence of effective and planned promotion policy. The aim of this study is to test interaction between tourism promotion expenditures, tourism revenue and number of tourists by employing recently developed Vector Autoregressive based Toda–Yamamoto and conventional Granger causality methods. In the study, annual data belonging to period between years 1990 and 2012 is used. Results of the empirical analyses give evidences about the relation between tourism promotion expenditures, tourism revenue and number of tourists. Findings obtained from both conventional Granger and Toda – Yamamoto causality tests imply that there is a causation linkage running from tourism promotion expenditures to number of tourists visiting Turkey. Results also indicate that there is no causal relationship between tourism promotion expenditures and tourism revenue.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ozcan, C. C., Ozcan, G. O. (2016). EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF INTERACTION BETWEEN PROMOTION EXPENDITURES AND TOURISM: THE CASE OF TURKEY. Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3, 201–208. https://ajindex.com/articles/835468

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (21)

  1. Arslan, A, (2014). Türkiye’nin Dış Turistik Tanıtımının Turizm Talebine Etkisi: 2001-2012
  2. Dönemi, Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(1),181-192.
  3. Avcıkurt, C. (2005), “Turizmde Tanıtma ve Satış Geliştirme”, Değişim Yayınları, İstanbul, 2005.
  4. Bozkurt, H. (2007) “Zaman Serileri Analizi”, Ekin Kitabevi, Bursa, 104s. Çatı, K.,Tuna, H. (2007). Türkiye’nin Tanıtım Harcamaları ile Turizm Geliri Arasındaki İlişkinin Belirlenmesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma, Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi (2): 13-33.
  5. Çetinel, F.G. (2001). Turizmde Tanıtım ve Reklam Faaliyetlerinin Önemi, Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi (2), 12, 151-161.
  6. Çoban, O. ve Özcan, C. C. (2013). “Türkiye’de Turizm Gelirleri-Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Nedensellik Analizi (1963-2010)”, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 8(1), 243-261.
  7. Deskins, J. Seevers, M. T., (2011). Are State Expenditures to Promote Tourism Effective? Journal of Travel Research 50(2) 154–170.
  8. Hacıoğlu, N. (1992).
  9. Dış Tanıtım ve Örgütleme Modeli, Turizm Yıllığı, Kalkınma Bankası Yayını, Ankara.
  10. Harris, R. ve Sollis, R. (2003) “Applied Time Series Modelling and Forecasting”, www.unibayreuth.de/departments/rw/lehrstuehle/vwl1, (07.02.2015).
  11. Karasu, T. (1990).
  12. Turizmde Tanıtma Üzerine, Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi (1): 31-34.
  13. Kayhan, S., Bayat, T. ve Koçyiğit, A. (2013). Enflasyon Hedeflemesi Rejiminde Öğrenme Süreci ve Asimetri: Markov Switching Yaklaşımı, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, Nisan 2013, 8(1),191‐212. Olalı, H.,(1983).
  14. Dış Tanıtım ve Turizm, Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları,
  15. Ankara.
  16. Olalı, H., ve Timur, A. (1987).
  17. Turizm Ekonomisi, Ofis Matbaacılık, İzmir.
  18. Rızaoğlu, Bahattin: “Turizmde Tanıtma”, Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara, 2004.
  19. Şahbaz, P. (2000). Türkiye’nin Tanıtım Harcamalarının Dış Turizm Talebine Etkileri, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi (2), 3, 121-150. TCKTB (Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı) (2014) http://www.ktbyatirimisletmeler.gov.tr/belge/1-38683/turizm-istatistikleri.html, (Erişim: 15.11.2011). TCMB (Türkiye Cumhuriyet Merkez Bankası) (2012) http://evds.tcmb.gov.tr/cbt.html, (01.02.2015).
  20. Toda, H. Y. & Yamamoto, T. (1995) “Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes”, Journal of Econometrics, 66(1), 225-250.
  21. Toda, Hiro Y. ve Yamamoto, T. (1995) “Statistical Inference in Vector Autoregressions with Possibly Integrated Processes”, J