Journals / Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting / 2026 / Volume: 13 Issue: 1

POLITICAL AFFILIATION AND ABNORMAL STOCK RETURNS AROUND ELECTIONS: AN EVENT STUDY FROM BANGLADESH

Al Amin(University of Dhaka)0009-0005-1314-7305
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion - The results indicate that investors capitalize expected political benefits into stock prices following a decisive election outcome.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose - This study examines whether political affiliation influences stock market reactions to national elections in an emerging economy like Bangladesh.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Given the close ties between business and politics in Bangladesh, the election provides a natural setting to assess how political information is incorporated into stock prices.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion - The results indicate that investors capitalize expected political benefits into stock prices following a decisive election outcome.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Political connections · stock market reaction · election

Abstract

Purpose - This study examines whether political affiliation influences stock market reactions to national elections in an emerging economy like Bangladesh. It investigates how firms affiliated with the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), the victorious party, respond to the most recent national election. Given the close ties between business and politics in Bangladesh, the election provides a natural setting to assess how political information is incorporated into stock prices. Methodology - Using an event study methodology, the study analyzes daily stock returns of 21 BNP-affiliated firms and a matched sample of 21 non-affiliated firms listed on the Dhaka Stock Exchange. Non-affiliated firms are matched by industry and firm size to isolate the effect of political affiliation. Abnormal returns are estimated using the market model, and cumulative abnormal returns are calculated over short event windows around the election. To examine whether stock price reactions reflect changes in firm fundamentals, the study also analyzes quarterly EPS and NAV for BNP-affiliated firms in the two quarters preceding the election. Findings - The findings show that BNP-affiliated firms experience positive and statistically significant abnormal returns on the first trading day following the election and earn significantly higher cumulative abnormal returns than non-affiliated firms over short post-election windows. In contrast, non-affiliated firms exhibit no significant market reaction. Importantly, no significant changes are observed in EPS or NAV prior to the election, suggesting that the stock price reaction is not driven by contemporaneous improvements in firm performance. Conclusion - The results indicate that investors capitalize expected political benefits into stock prices following a decisive election outcome. The study contributes to the literature on political connections by providing firm-level evidence from Bangladesh and highlighting the role of political affiliation in shaping investor expectations in emerging capital markets.

🔖

Cite This Article

Amin, A., Sobhan, R. (2026). POLITICAL AFFILIATION AND ABNORMAL STOCK RETURNS AROUND ELECTIONS: AN EVENT STUDY FROM BANGLADESH. Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting, Volume: 13 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2026.2043

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (28)

  1. Ahmed, Z. U., Begum, S., Islam, K. S., & Kamal, Y. (2022). Loan scams and corporate governance failure in the state-owned banks of a developing country. Corporate Ownership and Control, 20(1), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.22495/COCV20I1ART4
  2. Akcigit, U., Baslandze, S., & Lotti, F. (2023). Connecting to Power: Political Connections, Innovation, and Firm Dynamics. Econometrica, 91(2), 529–564. https://doi.org/10.3982/ecta18338
  3. Aldhamari, R., Mohamad Nor, M. N., Boudiab, M., & Mas’ud, A. (2020). The impact of political connection and risk committee on corporate financial performance: evidence from financial firms in Malaysia. Corporate Governance, 20(7), 1281–1305. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG- 04-2020-0122
  4. Ashraf, A., Hassan, M. K., Abbas, K., & Zaman, Q. U. (2020). Do firms harvest from political connections during general elections? Case of Pakistan. Journal of Financial Crime, 27(1), 258–273. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-02-2019-0022
  5. Brown, S. J., & Warner, J. B. (1985). Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies. Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(85)90042-X
  6. Changwatchai, P., & Dheera-aumpon, S. (2023). Political Connections and Stock Returns: The Case of 2019 Thai General Election. ABAC Journal. ABAC Journal, 44(1), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.59865/abacj.2024.6
  7. Chavali, K., Alam, M., & Rosario, S. (2020). Stock Market Response to Elections: An Event Study Method. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(5), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2020.VOL7.NO5.009
  8. Diwakar, K. A., & Vaswani, A. (2026). Political consistency and market efficiency: an event study analysis of the 2024 Indian general elections and stock market response. IIMT Journal of Management, 3(1), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1108/IIMTJM-08-2025-0069
  9. Faccio, M. (2006). Politically Connected Firms. American Economic Review, 96(1), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282806776157704
  10. Firdous, A., & Ray, S. (2025). Judging election impact on stock market: evidence from India. Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting, 12(2), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.2002
  11. Fisman, R. (2001). Estimating the value of political connections. American Economic Review, 91(4), 1095–1102. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.4.1095
  12. Goldman, E., Rocholl, J., & So, J. (2009). Do politically connected boards affect firm value? The Review of Financial Studies, 22(6), 2331– 2360. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn088
  13. Islam, M. S. U., Wong, W. C., & Yusoff, M. Y. B. M. (2023). Types of political connections, election years, and firm performance in Pakistan: Moderating role of external monitoring. Cogent Business and Management, 10(2), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2224139
  14. Jaya, J., & Kurniasari, W. (2026). Impact of a political event on stock market: the 2024 presidential election quick count version (Study on Indonesia Composite Index and LQ45 Stocks). Journal of Management and Business Review, 23(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.34149/jmbr.v23i1.763
  15. Kirana, N., & Sembel, R. (2019). The effect of political event on Indonesian Stock Market: An event study of the presidential election on LQ45 Index Stocks. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 19(1), 40–49.
  16. Li, J., & Born, J. A. (2006). Presidential election uncertainty and common stock returns in the United States. Journal of Financial Research, 29(4), 609–622. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6803.2006.00197.x
  17. Maaloul, A., Chakroun, R., & Yahyaoui, S. (2018). The effect of political connections on companies’ performance and value: Evidence from Tunisian companies after the revolution. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 8(2), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-12- 2016-0105/FULL/XML
  18. MacKinlay, A. C. (1997). Event studies in economics and finance. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), 13–39.
  19. Malkiel, B. G., & Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: a revıew of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1970.tb00518.x
  20. Oehler, A., Walker, T. J., & Wendt, S. (2013). Effects of election results on stock price performance: evidence from 1980 to 2008. Managerial Finance, 39(8), 714–736. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-May-2012-0126
  21. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Harper & Row.
  22. Repousis, S. (2016). Stocks’ prices manipulation around national elections?An event study for the case of Greek banking sector. Journal of Financial Crime, 23(2), 248–256. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-03-2014-0012
  23. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1989). Management entrenchment: The case of manager-specific investments. Journal of Financial Economics, 25(1), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(89)90099-8
  24. Sobhan, R. (2022). Ownership structure and firm performance: evidence from pharmaceutical and chemical ındustry of Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Business Environment, 12(4), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.13106/ajbe.2022.vol12.no4.35
  25. Sobhan, R., Jewel, M. A. K., & Sultana, T. (2025). The CEO’s last name matters: family control, independent oversight and tax avoidance. Asian Journal of Economics and Banking, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/ajeb-07-2025-0082
  26. Uddin, M. M., Islam, M. T., & Al Farooque, O. (2023). Effects of politically controlled boards on bank loan performance: an emerging economy perspective. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 13(3), 566–588. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-11-2021-0353
  27. Wei, Y., Jia, N., & Bonardi, J. P. (2023). Corporate political connections: a multidisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 49(6), 1870– 1910. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221136839
  28. Wielechowski, W., Czech, K., Weremczuk, A., & Próchniak, M. (2026). Stock market reactions to Donald Trump-involved U.S. presidential elections: Evidence from the S&P 500 in 2016, 2020, and 2024. International Journal of Management and Economics, 62(1), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.2478/ijme-2026-0004