SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Business Economics and Finance / 2025 / Volume: 14 Issue: 2

DO BOARD GOVERNANCE MECHANISMS INFLUENCE THE INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL–PERFORMANCE RELATIONSHIP? EVIDENCE FROM AN EMERGING ECONOMY

Asia Khatun(University of Dhaka)0000-0002-6055-0368
Raihan Sobhan(University of Dhaka)0000-0003-2015-8035
Shafera Siddique Aapan(University of Dhaka)0009-0000-3106-1234
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

By employing the MVAIC model, it offers novel evidence on how board attributes shape the effectiveness of IC in an emerging economy context.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose- This study examines the influence of intellectual capital (IC) on firm performance and the moderating role of board governance mechanisms in the context of Bangladesh, an emerging economy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methodology- Using panel data from 100 non-financial firms listed on the Dhaka Stock Exchange over 2018–2023, IC efficiency is measured through the Modified Value-Added Intellectual Capital (MVAIC) model, while firm performance is assessed using return on assets and Tobin’s Q.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:By employing the MVAIC model, it offers novel evidence on how board attributes shape the effectiveness of IC in an emerging economy context.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2018–2023 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Intellectual capital · firm performance · board characteristics

Abstract

Purpose- This study examines the influence of intellectual capital (IC) on firm performance and the moderating role of board governance mechanisms in the context of Bangladesh, an emerging economy. Methodology- Using panel data from 100 non-financial firms listed on the Dhaka Stock Exchange over 2018–2023, IC efficiency is measured through the Modified Value-Added Intellectual Capital (MVAIC) model, while firm performance is assessed using return on assets and Tobin’s Q. Findings- The findings demonstrate that IC efficiency positively and significantly enhances firm performance, with human capital, structural capital, and capital employed efficiency being key drivers. Moreover, board characteristics, particularly board size, independence, and meeting frequency, significantly strengthen the IC–performance relationship. Earnings per share (EPS) and the price–earnings (P/E) ratio are additionally employed as alternative measures of firm performance to verify the robustness of the observed relationship. Conclusion- The results highlight the importance of effective board governance in maximizing the benefits of IC. For managers and policymakers in emerging economies, strengthening board mechanisms and governance practices can enhance firm performance by ensuring better utilization of intangible assets. This is one of the pioneer studies to investigate the moderating role of board governance mechanisms in the IC–performance nexus within an emerging economy like Bangladesh. By employing the MVAIC model, it offers novel evidence on how board attributes shape the effectiveness of IC in an emerging economy context.

🔖

Cite This Article

Khatun, A., Sobhan, R., Aapan, S. S. (2025). DO BOARD GOVERNANCE MECHANISMS INFLUENCE THE INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL–PERFORMANCE RELATIONSHIP? EVIDENCE FROM AN EMERGING ECONOMY. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, Volume: 14 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.2026

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (42)

  1. Adebayo, A. O., Oyewole, O. M., & Lamidi, W. A. (2021). Corporate governance characteristics and intellectual capital of listed non-financial firms in Nigeria. Horn of Africa Journal of Business and Economics (HAJBE), 4(1), 44–55.
  2. Al-Musalli, M. A. K., & Ismail, K. N. I. K. (2012). Intellectual capital performance and board characteristics of GCC banks. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2(Af), 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(12)00082-2
  3. Andriessen, D. (2004). Making sense of intellectual capital: Designing a method for the valuation of intangibles. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann
  4. Bala, A. J., Hassan, A., & Muhammad, M. L. (2024). Do board characteristics matter in the relationship between intellectual capital efficiency and firm value? Evidence from the Nigerian oil and gas downstream sector. Future Business Journal, 10(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-024-00351-3
  5. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  6. Bharathi Kamath, G. (2019). Board Characteristics and Intellectual Capital Performance: A Comparison of Service vs. Manufacturing Firms in India. Scholedge International Journal of Business Policy & Governance, 6(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.19085/sijbpg060101
  7. Demartini, M. C., & Beretta, V. (2020). Intellectual capital and SMEs’ performance: A structured literature review. Journal of Small Business Management, 58(2), 288–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2019.1659680
  8. Ebrahim, S. A. H., Ali, B. J. A., & Oudat, M. S. (2021). The effect of board characteristics on intellectual capital in the commercial banks sector listed on the Bahrain bourse: An empirical study. Information Sciences Letters, 10(1), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.18576/isl/10S106
  9. Farooq, M., & Ahmad, N. (2023). Nexus between board characteristics, firm performance and intellectual capital: an emerging market evidence. Corporate Governance, 23(6), 1269–1297. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-08-2022-0355
  10. Faruq, M. O., Akter, T., & Mizanur Rahman, M. (2023). Does intellectual capital drive bank’s performance in Bangladesh? Evidence from static and dynamic approach. Heliyon, 9(7), e17656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17656
  11. Gujarati, D. (2003). Basic Econometrics. McGraw-Hill Education.
  12. Kamath, B. (2019). Impact of corporate governance characteristics on intellectual capital performance of firms in India. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 16(1), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-019-00054-0
  13. Kanakriyah, R. (2021). The impact of board of directors’ characteristics on firm performance: a case study in Jordan. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(3), 341–350. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no3.0341
  14. Li, J., Mangena, M., & Pike, R. (2012). The effect of audit committee characteristics on intellectual capital disclosure. The British Accounting Review, 44(2), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BAR.2012.03.003
  15. Majumder, M. T. H., Ruma, I. J., & Akter, A. (2023). Does intellectual capital affect bank performance? Evidence from Bangladesh. LBS Journal of Management & Research, 21(2), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1108/lbsjmr-05-2022-0016
  16. Mollah, M. A. S., & Rouf, M. A. (2022). The impact of intellectual capital on commercial banks’ performance: evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of Money and Business, 2(1), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmb-07-2021-0024
  17. Mondal, A., & Ghosh, S. K. (2012). Intellectual capital and financial performance of Indian banks. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 13(4), 515– 530. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691931211276115
  18. Mubaraq, S., & Ahmed Haji, A. (2014). The impact of corporate governance attributes on intellectual capital disclosure: A longitudinal investigation of Nigerian banking sector. Journal of Banking Regulation, 15(2), 144–163. https://doi.org/10.1057/jbr.2013.15
  19. Nabi, M. N., Gao, Q., Rahman, M. T., Britton, S. O., & Islam, M. M. (2020). Intellectual Capital and Corporate Performance: Evidence From Banking Industry of Bangladesh. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 10(1), 234-251. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijhrs.v10i1.16146
  20. Nadeem, M., Gan, C., & Nguyen, C. (2017). Does intellectual capital efficiency improve firm performance in BRICS economies? A dynamic panel estimation. Measuring Business Excellence, 21(1), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-12-2015-0055
  21. Okon Akpan, E. (2014). Board Characteristics and Company Performance: Evidence from Nigeria. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 2(3), 81- 99. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfa.20140203.17
  22. Ozkan, N., Cakan, S., & Kayacan, M. (2017). Intellectual capital and financial performance: A study of the Turkish Banking Sector. Borsa Istanbul Review, 17(3), 190–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2016.03.001
  23. Pavić Kramarić, T., Aleksic, A., & Pejic-Bach, M. (2018). Measuring the impact of board characteristics on the performance of Croatian insurance companies. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 10, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1847979018765864
  24. Rositha, A. H., Firdausi, N., & Darmawan, A. (2019). Board of director’s characteristics, intellectual capital, and bank performance. The International Journal of Accounting and Business Society, 27(2), 1–26.
  25. Ruta, C. D. (2009). HR portal alignment for the creation and development of intellectual capital. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(3), 562–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190802707318
  26. Scafarto, V., Ricci, F., Magnaghi, E., & Ferri, S. (2021). Board structure and intellectual capital efficiency: does the family firm status matter? In Journal of Management and Governance, 25(3), 221-234. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-020-09533-x
  27. Shah, S. Q. A., Lai, F. W., Tahir, M., Shad, M. K., Hamad, S., & Ali, S. E. A. (2024). Intellectual capital and financial performance: does board size and independent directors matter? An empirical enquiry. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-02-2023-0043
  28. Shahzad, K., Shah, S. Q. A., Lai, F. W., Jan, A. A., Shah, S. A. A., & Shad, M. K. (2023). Exploring the nexus of corporate governance and intellectual capital efficiency: from the lens of profitability. Quality and Quantity, 57(3), 2447–2468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022- 01472-z
  29. Smriti, N., & Das, N. (2018). The impact of intellectual capital on firm performance: a study of Indian firms listed in COSPI. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(5), 935–964. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-11-2017-0156
  30. Soewarno, N., & Tjahjadi, B. (2020). Measures that matter: an empirical investigation of intellectual capital and financial performance of banking firms in Indonesia. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 21(6), 1085–1106. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-09-2019-0225
  31. Stewart, T. A. (1997). Intellectual capital: the new wealth of organizations. Doubleday.
  32. Sveiby, K. E. (1997). The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  33. Tan, H. P., Plowman, D., & Hancock, P. (2008). The evolving research on intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9(4), 585–608. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930810913177
  34. Ting, I. W. K., Ren, C., Chen, F. C., & Kweh, Q. L. (2020). Interpreting the dynamic performance effect of intellectual capital through a value- added-based perspective. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 21(3), 381–401. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-05-2019-0098
  35. Vo, D. H., & Tran, N. P. (2021). Intellectual capital and bank performance in Vietnam. Managerial Finance, 47(8), 1094–1106. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-03-2020-0143
  36. Wang, Z., Cai, S., Liang, H., Wang, N., & Xiang, E. (2021). Intellectual capital and firm performance: the mediating role of innovation speed and quality. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(6), 1222–1250. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1511611
  37. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/SMJ.4250050207;CTYPE:STRING:JOURNAL
  38. Wooldridge, J. M. (2016). Introductory Econometrics (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  39. Xu, J., & Li, J. (2022). The interrelationship between intellectual capital and firm performance: evidence from China’s manufacturing sector. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23(2), 313–341. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-08-2019-0189
  40. Xu, J., & Liu, F. (2020). The impact of intellectual capital on firm performance: A modified and extended vaic model. Journal of Competitiveness, 12(1), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2020.01.10
  41. Zheng, C., Islam, M. N., Hasan, N., & Halim, M. A. (2022). Does intellectual capital efficiency matter for banks’ performance and risk-taking behavior? Cogent Economics and Finance, 10(1), 22-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2127484
  42. Stewart, T. A. (1997). Intellectual capital: the new wealth of organizations. Doubleday.