Journals / Journal of Business Economics and Finance / 2017 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

EFFECTS OF INSTITUTIONALISATION FACTORS AND BENCHMARKING TECHNIQUES ON THE FIRM PERFORMANCE

Pages
155–167
Publication Date
2017-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In other words, it is not possible to talk about institutionalisation without the employment of qualified professionals and training, along with objective performance evaluation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose- In this study, the effects of institutionalisation factors and benchmarking techniques in Turkish family companies providing service in the food sector on company performance were put forward with a literature survey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methodology- A survey was applied to the employees of family companies providing service in the food sector by using a seven-point Likert-type scale consisting of 56 questions, and 160 surveys were evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In other words, it is not possible to talk about institutionalisation without the employment of qualified professionals and training, along with objective performance evaluation.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Family company · institutionalisation · sustainable management

Abstract

Purpose- In this study, the effects of institutionalisation factors and benchmarking techniques in Turkish family companies providing service in the food sector on company performance were put forward with a literature survey. Methodology- A survey was applied to the employees of family companies providing service in the food sector by using a seven-point Likert-type scale consisting of 56 questions, and 160 surveys were evaluated. The survey results were evaluated in the light of the reliability analyses of the answers, factor analyses, correlation analyses, and regression analyses by using SPSS. Findings- The effects of institutionalisation, sustainable management, and benchmarking on company performance were determined with the applied analysis technique. As a result, it was determined that institutionalization and benchmarking techniques have a significant impact on company performance. Conclusion- In Turkey, it is necessary for family companies to develop an action plan based on institutional principles rather than the bossoriented management approach and take action accordingly. In other words, it is not possible to talk about institutionalisation without the employment of qualified professionals and training, along with objective performance evaluation.

🔖

Cite This Article

COSKUN, Z., ALTİNDAG, E. (2017). EFFECTS OF INSTITUTIONALISATION FACTORS AND BENCHMARKING TECHNIQUES ON THE FIRM PERFORMANCE. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 155–167. https://ajindex.com/articles/835108

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Akça, N., Aile İşletmelerinin Tanımı, Özellikleri ve Aile İşletmelerinde Kurumsallaşma, Denizli İlinde Bir Araştırma [The Definition, Characteristics of Family Companies and Institutionalization in Family Companies, a Study in the province of Denizli], Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Denizli, 2010.
  2. Akdağ, H., Değişim Mühendisliği ve Kıyaslama (Benchmarking) Yönetim Tekniklerinin Firma Performansı Üzerindeki Etkisi: Bir İstanbul Örneği, [The Effect of the Management Techniques of Reengineering and Benchmarking on the Company Performance: an Example of Istanbul], Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Beykent Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul, 2014.
  3. Aktaş, N., "Kars, Ardahan, Iğdır Bölgesinde Faaliyette Bulunan Üretim İşletmelerinde Benchmarking Yönetim Tekniğinin Bilinirliği ve Uygulanabilirliği Üzerine Bir Araştırma [A study on the Familiarity and Applicability of the Benchmarking Management Technique in Production Businesses Operating in the Region of Kars, Ardahan, Iğdır], Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Kafkas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kars, 2009.
  4. Avcı, S., Kargo Firmalarında Lojistik Performansın Değerlendirilmesi ve Bir Benchmarking Uygulaması [The Evaluation of the Logistics Performance in Courier Companies and a Benchmarking Implementation], Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gebze Yüksek Teknoloji Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Gebze, 2007.
  5. Barnett, M. and Duvall, R., ‘Power in international politics’, International Organization 59(4): 39–75. 2005.
  6. Carstensen, M. B., & Schmidt, V. A. Power through, over and in ideas: conceptualizing ideational power in discursive institutionalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(3), 318-337.2016.
  7. Dogan, S., Demiral, Ö., İşletmelerde Stratejik Yönetimin Etkinliğini Araştırmada Önemli Bir Araç; Benchmarking [An Important Means in Studying the Efficiency of Strategical Management in Businesses; Benchmarking], Z.K.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt 4, Sayı 7, 2008, ss.122. Dokuzer, B., Modern Bir Yönetim Tekniği Olarak Benchmarking'in İşletmeler Tarafından Bilinirliği ve Uygulanabilirliğinin Saptanmasına Yönelik Bir Araştırma-Niğde Örneği [A Study on the Determination of the Familiarity and Applicability of Benchmarking by Businesses as a Modern Management Technique-an Example of Niğde], Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Niğde Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Niğde, 2006.
  8. Erdem, B., İşletmelerde Yeni Bir Yönetim Yaklaşımı; Kıy