SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon / 2020 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2

IN VITRO EVALUATION OF ELECTROSPUN POLYSACCHARIDE BASED NANOFIBROUS MATS AS SURGICAL ADHESION BARRIERS

Şerife ŞAFAK
Özgür VATAN
Nilüfer ÇİNKILIÇ
Esra KARACA
Pages
99–107
Publication Date
2020-06-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results of the in vitro experiment showed that the nanofibrous mats have maintained their physical structures during the critical period for adhesion formation, and had non-adherent cell feature and non-cytotoxic nature required for an ideal adhesion barrier.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Postoperative adhesions are one of the most important problems that the patients and surgeons face.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The produced nanofibrous mats were crosslinked with 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride and N-hydroxysulfosuccinimide.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results of the in vitro experiment showed that the nanofibrous mats have maintained their physical structures during the critical period for adhesion formation, and had non-adherent cell feature and non-cytotoxic nature required for an ideal adhesion barrier.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:nanofiber · adhesion barrier · polysaccharide polymers

Abstract

Postoperative adhesions are one of the most important problems that the patients and surgeons face. In this study, nanofibrous mats as a novel surgical adhesion barrier were produced from polysaccharide-based polymers, hyaluronic acid, carboxymethyl cellulose and sodium alginate, via electrospinning. The produced nanofibrous mats were crosslinked with 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride and N-hydroxysulfosuccinimide. Furthermore, the morphology, and the in vitro degradation, cytotoxicity and cell adherence potential of the nanofibrous mats aimed to be used as adhesion barriers were evaluated and compared with a commercial adhesion barrier. After the crosslinking process, the nanofibrous structure was maintained, and the diameters of resulting nanofibers were below 300 nm. Results of the in vitro experiment showed that the nanofibrous mats have maintained their physical structures during the critical period for adhesion formation, and had non-adherent cell feature and non-cytotoxic nature required for an ideal adhesion barrier.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAFAK, Ş., VATAN, Ö., ÇİNKILIÇ, N., KARACA, E. (2020). IN VITRO EVALUATION OF ELECTROSPUN POLYSACCHARIDE BASED NANOFIBROUS MATS AS SURGICAL ADHESION BARRIERS. Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2, 99–107. https://ajindex.com/articles/83491

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Deitzel J.M., Kleinmeyer J., Harris DEA., & Tan NB. (2001). The effect of processing variables on the morphology of electrospun nanofibers and textiles. Polymer, 42:261–272
  2. Supaphol P., Suwantong O., Sangsanoh P., Srinivasan S., Jayakumar R. & Nair SV. (2012). Electrospinning of biocompatible polymers and their potentials in biomedical applications. Adv Polym Sci, 246:213–240
  3. Ramakrishna S., Fujıhara K., Teo WE., Lim TC. & Ma Z. (2005). An introduction to electrospinning and nanofibers. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co, 396 p
  4. Patanaik A., Anandjiwala RD., Rengasamy RS., Ghosh A. & Pal H. (2007). Nanotechnology in fibrous materials- a new perspective. Text Prog, 39:67-120
  5. Huang C., Chen S., Lai C., Reneker DH., Qiu H., Ye Y. & Hou H. (2006). Electrospun polymer nanofibres with small diameters. Nanotechnology, 17:1558–1563
  6. Kotek R. (2008). Recent advances in polymer fibers. Polym. Rev. 48, 221–229
  7. Zhang X., Reagan R.M. & Kaplan D.L. (2009). Electrospun silk biomaterial scaffolds for regenerative medicine. Adv Drug Deliver Rev, 61:988–1006
  8. Amiraliyan N., Nouri M. & Kish M.H. (2009). Effects of some electrospinning parameters on morphology of natural silk-based nanofibers. J Appl Polym Sci, 113:226–234
  9. Tucker N., Stanger J.J., Staiger M.P., Razzaq H. & Hofman K. (2012). The history of the science and technology of electrospinning from 1600 to 1995. J Eng Fabr Fiber, 7:63–72
  10. Valizadeh A. & Farkhani S.M. (2014). Electrospinning and electrospun nanofibres. IET Nanobiotechnoloy, 8:83–92
  11. Cengiz F., Krucinska I., Gliscinska E., Chrzanowski M. & Göktepe F. (2009). Comparative analysis of various electrospinning methods of nanofibre formation. Fibres Text East Eur, 17:13–19
  12. Şafak Ş., Düzyer Ş. & Karaca E. (2016). Evaluation of biocompatibility of fibroin-based electrospun nanofibrous mats for medical applications. Ind Textila, 67:3–9
  13. Jian F., HaiTao N., Tong L. & XunGai W. (2008). Applications of electrospun nanofibers. Chinese Sci Bull, 15:2265–2286
  14. Vanugopal J.R., Zhang Y. & Ramakrishna S. (2006). In vitro culture of human dermal fibroblasts on electrospun polycaprolactone collagen nanofibrous membrane. Artif Organs, 30:440–446
  15. Yoo H.S., Kim T.G. & Park T.G. (2009). Surface-functionalized electrospun nanofibers for tissue engineering and drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliver Rev, 61:1033–1042
  16. Kenawy E.R., Abdel-Hay F.I., El-Newehy M.H. & Wnek G.E. (2009). Processing of polymer nanofibers throug