Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 4

Volume and T2 relaxation time measurements of quadriceps femoris and hamstring muscles are reliable and reproducible

Pages
2007–2014
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Volume and T2 relaxation time measurements of the quadriceps femoris and the hamstring muscles are reliable and reproducible.Key words: Magnetic resonance imaging, reliability, reproducibility, skeletal muscle, thigh

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: Volume and T2 relaxation time measurements of the skeletal muscle provide quantitative information.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We aimed to evaluate the interobserver reliability and the intraobserver reproducibility of measurements of volumes and T2 relaxation times of the quadriceps femoris and the hamstring muscles.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Volume and T2 relaxation time measurements of the quadriceps femoris and the hamstring muscles are reliable and reproducible.Key words: Magnetic resonance imaging, reliability, reproducibility, skeletal muscle, thigh
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: Volume and T2 relaxation time measurements of the skeletal muscle provide quantitative information. We aimed to evaluate the interobserver reliability and the intraobserver reproducibility of measurements of volumes and T2 relaxation times of the quadriceps femoris and the hamstring muscles. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional reliability study was conducted on ten recreational athletes. The images of the quadriceps and the hamstring muscles of both limbs were obtained using a 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner. Two sports medicine specialists measured muscle volumes from a total of 2560 images and T2 relaxation times from a total of 40 images, and repeated this once more. The intraobserver and interobserver compliance were assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach’s alpha (α). Results: Volume and T2 relaxation time of quadriceps femoris and hamstring muscle measurements with MRI had good to excellent reliability (Muscle volume; intraobserver ICCs: between 0.97 and 0.99, α: between 0.98 and 0.99 and interobserver ICCs: between 0.96 and 0.99, α: 0.99. T2 relaxation time; intraobserver ICCs: between 0.74 and 0.96, α: between 0.85 and 0.98 and interobserver ICCs: between 0.75 and 0.90, α: between 0.85 and 0.95). Conclusion: Volume and T2 relaxation time measurements of the quadriceps femoris and the hamstring muscles are reliable and reproducible.Key words: Magnetic resonance imaging, reliability, reproducibility, skeletal muscle, thigh

🔖

Cite This Article

TORĞUTALP, Ş. Ş., KORKUSUZ, F., ÖZKAN, Ö., OĞUZ, K. K., PARLAK, Ş. (2022). Volume and T2 relaxation time measurements of quadriceps femoris and hamstring muscles are reliable and reproducible. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 4, 2007–2014. https://ajindex.com/articles/609321

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Franchi MV, Longo S, Mallinson J, Quinlan JI, Taylor T et al. Muscle thickness correlates to muscle cross-sectional area in the assessment of strength training-induced hypertrophy. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports 2018
  2. 28 (3): 846-853. doi: 10.1111/sms.12961 2. Scott SH, Engstrom CM, Loeb GE. Morphometry of human thigh muscles. Determination of fascicle architecture by magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Anatomy 1993
  3. 182 (Pt 2): 249-257. 3. Mandić M, Rullman E, Widholm P, Lilja M, Dahlqvist Leinhard O et al. Automated assessment of regional muscle volume and hypertrophy using MRI. Scientific Reports 2020
  4. 10 (1): 2239. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59267-x 4. Farrow M, Biglands J, Tanner SF, Clegg A, Brown L et al. The effect of ageing on skeletal muscle as assessed by quantitative MR imaging: an association with frailty and muscle strength. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research 2021
  5. 33 (2): 291- 301. doi: 10.1007/s40520-020-01530-2 5. Wattjes MP, Kley RA, Fischer D. Neuromuscular imaging in inherited muscle diseases. European Radiology 2010
  6. 20 (10): 2447-2460. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-1799-2 6. Lee JC, Mitchell AWM, Healy JC. Imaging of muscle injury in the elite athlete. The British Journal of Radiology 2012
  7. 85 (1016): 1173-1185. doi: 10.1259/bjr/84622172 7. Pons C, Borotikar B, Garetier M, Burdin V, Ben Salem D et al. Quantifying skeletal muscle volume and shape in humans using MRI: a systematic review of validity and reliability. PLoS One 2018
  8. 13 (11): e0207847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207847 8. Sun H, Xu MT, Wang XQ, Wang MH, Wang BH et al. Comparison thigh skeletal muscles between snowboarding halfpipe athletes and healthy volunteers using quantitative multi-parameter magnetic resonance imaging at rest. Chinese Medical Journal 2018
  9. 131 (9): 1045-1050. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.230740 9. Messina C, Maffi G, Vitale JA, Ulivieri FM, Guglielmi G et al. Diagnostic imaging of osteoporosis and sarcopenia: a narrative review. Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery 2018
  10. 8 (1): 86-99. doi: 10.21037/qims.2018.01.01 10. Henninger HB, Christensen GV, Taylor CE, Kawakami J, Hillyard BS et al. The muscle cross-sectional area on MRI of the shoulder can predict muscle volume. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 2019
  11. 478 (4): 871-883. doi: 10.1097/ corr.0000000000001044 11. Cawthon PM. Assessment of lean mass and physical performance in sarcopenia. Journal of Clinical Densitometry 2015
  12. 18 (4): 467-471. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2