SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Information Security Science / 2012 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2

A Study on OS Selection Using ANP Based Choquet Integral in Terms of Cyber Threats

Kerim Goztepe
Pages
67–78
Publication Date
2012-07-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Numerical study has also been demonstrated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Critical systems are today exposed to new kinds of security threats.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Because of the importance of cyber threats, operating system (OS) selection is a critical decision that can significantly affect future competitiveness and performance of an organization.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Numerical study has also been demonstrated.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Cyber threats · Operating system selection · Analytic Network Process

Abstract

Critical systems are today exposed to new kinds of security threats. Cyber security is determine with cyberspace safe from threats, it is called cyber-threats. Cyber-threats is applied the malicious use of information and communication technologies or the behaviour of attackers. Because of the importance of cyber threats, operating system (OS) selection is a critical decision that can significantly affect future competitiveness and performance of an organization. It is increasingly valuable in today’s current administration and businesses because of its ability to integrate the information. An operating system, especially with the weakness in security can lead to serious financial losses. The aim of this study is to develop a decision model based on Analitic Network Process (ANP)-choquet integral integration that select the appropriate operating system for critical computer systems by taking subjective judgments of decision makers into consideration. Proposed approach is based on ANP-choquet integral method. ANP method is used in determining the weights of the criteria by decision makers and then choquet integral is applied in rankings of the operating systems. Numerical study has also been demonstrated.

🔖

Cite This Article

Goztepe, K. (2012). A Study on OS Selection Using ANP Based Choquet Integral in Terms of Cyber Threats. International Journal of Information Security Science, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2, 67–78. https://ajindex.com/articles/833078

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. S. Galvin, Operating System Concepts, 4th Edition.
  2. Addison Wesley, Reading, MA, 1994.
  3. A.S. Tanenbaum, Operating Systems: Design and Implementation. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, E. Tolga, M. L. Demircan, C. Kahraman, “Operating system selection using fuzzy replacement analysis and analytic hierarchy process”, Int. J. Production Economics, 97, pp.89-117, 2005.
  4. G.D. Knott, A proposal for certain process management and intercommunication primitives. SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, 8(4), pp.7-44,
  5. S. Balli and S. Korukoğlu, Operating System Selection Using Fuzzy Ahp And Topsis Methods, Mathematical and Computational Applications, (2), pp.119-130, 2009.
  6. S. Jharkharia, R. Shankar, “Selection of logistics service provider: an analytic network process (ANP) approach”, Omega, 35, pp.274-289, 2007.
  7. S. Boran, K. Goztepe and E. Yavuz, “A study on election of personnel based on performance measurement by using analytic network process (ANP)”, IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 8(4), 2008.
  8. C. W. Chang, C.-R. Wu, C.-T Lin, and H.-L. Lin, “Evaluating digital video recorder using analytic hierarchy Information Sciences, 177(16), pp.3383-3396, 2007. network processes”, T.L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, USA, 1980.
  9. T.L. Saaty, Decision making with dependence and feedback: the analytic network process, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, 1996. T.L. Saaty, “Fundamentals of the analytic network process”, Kobe, Japan: ISAHP, 1999.
  10. A. B. McBratney, O.A. Odeh, “Application of fuzzy sets in soil science: fuzzy logic, fuzzy measurements and fuzzy decisions”, Geoderma 77, 113, 1997. H. J. Zimmermann, “Fuzzy Set Theory and its Applications”, London, 1994.
  11. Academic Publishers,
  12. C.H. Liu, G.H. Tzeng, and M.H. Lee, “Improving tourism policy implementation-the use of hybrid MCDM models”, Tourism Management, 33(2), pp.239-488, 2012. J.L. Yang and G.H. Tzeng, “An integrated MCDM technique combined with DEMATEL for a novel cluster-weighted with ANP method”, Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), pp.1417-1424, 2011.
  13. S. Boran and K. Goztepe, Development of a fuzzy decision support system for commodity acquisition using fuzzy analytic network process, Expert Systems with Applications, 37, pp.1939-1945, 2010. T. L. Saaty, “The analytic hierarchy and analytic network measurement processes: Applications to decisions under Risk”, European Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 1 (1), pp.122-196, 2008.
  14. T.L. Saaty, L.G. Var