Journals / International Econometric Review / 2016 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

The Impact of Investor Sentiment on the 'Leverage Effect'

Pages
4–18
Publication Date
2016-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Behavioral finance theory and the availability and social proof heuristics serve as potential explanations for such findings.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:With the advent of the Internet and the availability of user search query data on a broader scale, since the early 2000s researchers have started using collective search query information instead of, or, in addition to, traditional investor sentiment proxies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study examines whether the leverage (bad news) effect, as measured by the EGARCH (1,1) model, changes with the inclusion of a newly emerging sentiment proxy, internet search volume.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Behavioral finance theory and the availability and social proof heuristics serve as potential explanations for such findings.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:EGARCH · Investor Sentiment · Leverage Effect

Abstract

With the advent of the Internet and the availability of user search query data on a broader scale, since the early 2000s researchers have started using collective search query information instead of, or, in addition to, traditional investor sentiment proxies. This study examines whether the leverage (bad news) effect, as measured by the EGARCH (1,1) model, changes with the inclusion of a newly emerging sentiment proxy, internet search volume. The sample consists of 14 US companies belonging to the NASDAQ and NYSE Indices and 501 observations of data collected at weekly frequency spanning a nine year period. Empirical findings suggest that, inclusion of the investor sentiment variable has no clear impact on the bad news effect; there is, however, a discernible increase in volatility persistence. The implications of the findings are that the investor sentiment proxy has additional informational content. Behavioral finance theory and the availability and social proof heuristics serve as potential explanations for such findings.

🔖

Cite This Article

Son-Turan, S. (2016). The Impact of Investor Sentiment on the 'Leverage Effect'. International Econometric Review, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 4–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/832149

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19 (6), 716-723.
  2. Antweiler, W. and M.Z. Frank (2004). Is all that talk just noise? The information content of internet stock message boards. The Journal of Finance, 59 (3), 1259-1294.
  3. Araghi, M.K. and M.M. Pak (2012). Assessing the Exchange Rate Fluctuation on Tehran's Stock Market Price: A GARCH Application. International Journal of Management and Business Research (IJMBR), 2(2), 95-107.
  4. Askitas, N. and K. Zimmermann (2009). Google econometrics and unemployment forecasting. Applied Economics Quarterly, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, 55 (2), 107 Baker, M. and J. Wurgler (2007). Investor sentiment in the stock market. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21, 129-152.
  5. Bank, M., M. Larch and G. Peter (2011). Google search volume and its influence on liquidity and returns of German stocks. Financial markets and portfolio management, 25 (3), 264. Barber, B.M. and T. Odean (2008). All that glitters: The effect of attention and news on the buying behavior of individual and institutional investors. Review of Financial Studies, 21 (2), 785-818.
  6. Barberis, N., A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny (1998). A model of investor sentiment. Journal of Financial Economics, 49 (3), 307-343.
  7. Black, F. (1976). The pricing of commodity contracts. Journal of financial economics, 3 (1), 179. Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31 (3), 307-327.
  8. Bordino, I., S. Battiston, G. Caldarelli, M. Cristelli, A. Ukkonen and I. Weber (2012). Web search queries can predict stock market volumes. PloS one, 7 (7), e40014. Breeden, D.T. (1979). An intertemporal asset pricing model with stochastic consumption and investment opportunities. Journal of financial Economics, 7 (3), 265-296.
  9. Brooks, R.D., R.W. Faff and T.R. Fry (2001). GARCH modelling of individual stock data: the impact of censoring, firm size and trading volume. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 11 (2), 215-222.
  10. Brooks, C. (2002) Introductory Econometrics for Finance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Brown, G.W. and M.T. Cliff (2005). Investor Sentiment and Asset Valuation.The Journal of Business, 78 (2), 405-440.
  12. Cialdini, R.B. (1984). The psychology of persuasion. New York: Quill William Morrow. Chen, N.F., R. Roll and S.A. Ross (1986). Economic forces and the stock market. Journal of business, 383-403.
  13. Christakis, N.A. and H.F