Journals / Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1

BODY COMPOSITION AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH MOTOR PERFORMANCE IN NEUROMUSCULAR DISEASES

Pages
39–45
Publication Date
2018-04-24
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Preventive strategies should be considered from the early stages of the disease.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 26.0px 'Helvetica Neue'} Purpose: Increased fat mass and decreased muscle mass affect patient’s motor performance during slowly progressive neuromuscular diseases (NMDs).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of body composition on motor performance in adult patients with NMDs.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Preventive strategies should be considered from the early stages of the disease.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Body Composition · Motor Performance · Neuromuscular Disease.

Özet

p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 26.0px 'Helvetica Neue'} Purpose: Increased fat mass and decreased muscle mass affect patient’s motor performance during slowly progressive neuromuscular diseases (NMDs). The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of body composition on motor performance in adult patients with NMDs. Methods: Twenty-six patients and 26 age-matched healthy participants were included in this cross-sectional study. Body composition was assessed using a bioelectrical impedance analyzer, and the motor performance was determined using a manual muscle testing, and timed performance was evaluated using climbing ten stairs, walking 10 m, wearing a t-shirt, supine up tests, and functional level using Motor Function Measurement (MFM) scale. Results: There was no difference between the patients and the controls in terms of age, height, weight, and body composition (p>0.05). There was no correlation between body composition and timed performance tests for controls. In patients, the body mass index (BMI), fat mass (FM), and fat percentage (%FM) were correlated with the time of climbing 10 stairs (r=0.631, r=0.693, r=0.718, respectively) and supine up time (r=0.493, r=0.643, r=0.621, respectively) (p<0.05). Ten meter walking time was correlated with %FM (r=0.496) and fat free mass (r=-0.475, p<0.05). The MFM score was related with BMI (r=-0.425), FM (r=-0.503) and %FM (r=-0.586, p<0.05). Total lower extremity muscle strength was correlated with FM (r=-0.456) and %FM (r=-0.550) in patients (p<0.05). Conclusion: The results of the study showed that body composition might be a factor affecting motor performance in adult patients with NMDs. Preventive strategies should be considered from the early stages of the disease.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAŞA, M. E., YILDIRIM, S. A. (2018). BODY COMPOSITION AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH MOTOR PERFORMANCE IN NEUROMUSCULAR DISEASES. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1, 39–45. https://ajindex.com/articles/830833

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Kilmer DD, Zhao HH. Obesity, physical activity, and the metabolic syndrome in adult neuromuscular disease. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2005;16(4):1053-62
  2. McCrory MA, Kim H-R, Wright NC, Lovelady CA, Aitkens S, Kilmer DD. Energy expenditure, physical activity, and body composition of ambulatory adults with hereditary neuromuscular disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998;67(6):1162-9
  3. Weil E, Wachterman M, McCarthy EP, Davis RB, O’day B, Iezzoni LI, et al. Obesity among adults with disabling conditions. JAMA. 2002;288(10):1265-8
  4. Zoico E, Di Francesco V, Guralnik J, Mazzali G, Bortolani A, Guariento S, et al. Physical disability and muscular strength in relation to obesity and different body composition indexes in a sample of healthy elderly women. Int J Obes Relat Met Disord. 2004;28(2):234-41
  5. Simoes EJ, Kobau R, Kapp J, Waterman B, Mokdad A, Anderson L. Associations of physical activity and body mass index with activities of daily living in older adults. J Community Health. 2006;31(6):453-67
  6. Erselcan T, Candan F, Saruhan S, Ayca T. Comparison of body composition analysis methods in clinical routine. Ann Nutr Metab. 2000;44(5-6):243-8
  7. Sedehizadeh S, Brook JD, Maddison P. Body composition and clinical outcome measures in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1. Neuromuscul Disord. 2017;27(3):286-9
  8. Miscione MT, Bruno F, Ripamonti C, Nervuti G, Orsini R, Faldini C, et al. Body composition, muscle strength, and physical function of patients with Bethlem myopathy and Ullrich congenital muscular dystrophy. Sci Word Jo. 2013;2013:152684
  9. Vohra RS, Lott D, Mathur S, Senesac C, Deol J, Germain S, et al. Magnetic resonance assessment of hypertrophic and pseudo-hypertrophic changes in lower leg muscles of boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy and their relationship to functional measurements. PloS One. 2015;10(6):e0128915
  10. Kyle UG, Bosaeus I, De Lorenzo AD, Deurenberg P, Elia M, Gómez JM, et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis—part I: review of principles and methods. Clin Nutr. 2004;23(5):1226-43
  11. World Health Organization. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. (WHO) Technical Report Series 894. Geneva: WHO. 2000
  12. Kendall FP, McCreary EK. Muscles, testing and function. Brit J Sports Med. 1984;18(1):25
  13. Bushby K, Finkel R, Birnkrant DJ, Case LE, Clemens PR, Cripe L, et al. Diagnosis and management of Duchenne muscular dystrophy, part 1: diagnosis, and pharmacological and psychosocial management. Lancet Neurol. 201