Journals / Optimum Ekonomi ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

Relationship between the Board Size and Financial Performance: Literature Review

Yönetim Kurulu Büyüklüğü ile Finansal Performans Arasındaki İlişkiye Yönelik Literatür Taraması

Pages
—
Publication Date
2015-01-14
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A significant part of the board of directors of the studies indicated a negative relationship between financial performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Cadbury Report (1992), a pioneer in outlining the financial aspects of corporate governance, was the first to put the spotlight on corporate boards of directors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Around the same time, academic work started to gain impetus with the Hermalin and Weisbach (1991) study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A significant part of the board of directors of the studies indicated a negative relationship between financial performance.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yönetim Kurulu Büyüklüğü · Finansal Performans · Literatür Taraması

Abstract

The Cadbury Report (1992), a pioneer in outlining the financial aspects of corporate governance, was the first to put the spotlight on corporate boards of directors. Around the same time, academic work started to gain impetus with the Hermalin and Weisbach (1991) study. The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between the number of members of the board of directors with accounting and market-based performance indicators empirical research in the national and international literature. For this purpose, all studies conducted in the early 1990s up to the present day are classified examined in a systematic way. A significant part of the board of directors of the studies indicated a negative relationship between financial performance.

Özet

Şirket yönetim kurullarının mercek altına alınması, kurumsal yönetimin finansal boyutunu ilk kez ortaya koyan Cadbury (1992) raporu ile gerçekleşmiştir. Bu alandaki akademik çalışmalar aynı dönemde Hermalin ve Weisbach (1991)’ın çalışmaları ile hız kazanmıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı ulusal ve uluslararası literatürde yönetim kurulu üye sayısı ile muhasebe ve piyasa esaslı performans göstergeleri arasındaki ilişkiyi inceleyen ampirik araştırmaları irdelemektir. Bu amaçla 1990’lı yılların başından günümüze kadar yapılmış olan bütün çalışmalar sistematik bir şekilde incelenerek sınıflandırılmıştır. Yapılan çalışmaların önemli bir bölümünde yönetim kurulu büyüklüğü artışı ile finansal performans arasında negatif ilişkiler tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOĞAN, M., TOPAL, Y. (2015). Relationship between the Board Size and Financial Performance: Literature Review. Optimum Ekonomi ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1. https://ajindex.com/articles/82878

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Ahmed, K., Hossain, M. & Adams, M. B. (2006). The Effects of Board Composition and Board Size on the Informativeness of Annual Accounting Earnings. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(5), 418-431.
  2. Akdoğan, Y. E. & Boyacıoğlu, M. A. (2010). Corporate Governance In Turkey: An Overview. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 24, 11-30. Andres, de P. A., Azofra, V. & Lopez, F. (2005). Corporate Boards in Some OECD Countries: Size, Composition, Functioning and Effectiveness. Corporate Governance. An International Review, 13, 197- 210. Anne, H. C. & Williams, M. S. (2003). International Comparative Analysis of the Association Between Board Structure and The Efficiency of Value Added by a Firm from its Physical Capital and İntellectual Capital Resources. The International Journal of Accounting, 38, 465- 491. Arosa B., Iturralde T. & Maseda A. (2010). Outsiders on The Board of Directors and Firm Performance: Evidence from Spanish Non-Listed Family Firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1, 236– 245. Arosa B., Iturralde T. & Maseda A. (2013). The Board Structure and Firm Performance in Smes: Evidence from Spain. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 19, 127– 135. Aygün, M., İç, S. & Sayın, C. (2011). Yönetim Kurulu Büyüklüğünü Belirleyen Faktörler ve Yönetim Kurulu Büyüklüğü İle Firma Performansı Arasındaki İlişki. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10, 77-92.
  3. Baptista, M. A. A., Klotzle, M.C. & Melo, M.A.C. (2011). Ceo Duality and Firm Performance in Brazil: Evidence From 2008. Revista Persamento Contemporaneo em Aministracao, UFF, 11, 36- 55. Barnhart, S. W. & Roseinstein, S. (1998).
  4. Board Composition, Managerial Ownership and Firm Performance: An Empirical Analysis. The Financial Review, 33, 1- 16. Bhagat, S. & Black, B. (2002). The Non-Correlation Between Board İndependence And Long Term Firm Performance. Journal of Corporation Law, 27, 231– 274. Bhagat, S. & Bolton, B. (2013).
  5. Director Ownership, Governance and Performance. Journal of Financial and Quantıtatıve Analysis, 48(1), 1- 33. Beiner, S., Drobetz, W., Schmid, F. & Zimmermann, H. (2003). Is Board Size Anindependent Corporate Governance Mechanism?. Kyklos, 57, 327- 356. Beiner, S., Drobetz, W., Schmid, M. M. & Zimmermann, H. (2006). An İntegrated Framework of Corporate Governance and Firm Valuation, European Financial Management, 12, 249- 283. Bennedsen, M., Kongsted, H. C. & Nielsen, K. M. (2008). The Causal Effect of Board Size i