Journals / Optimum Ekonomi ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

The Relationship of Terms of Trade and Economic Growth: The Turkish Case

Dış Ticaret Hadleri Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Türkiye Üzerine Bir Uygulama

Pages
—
Publication Date
2015-06-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

With findings of this study, outward-oriented growth strategy depends on the terms of trade are in favor of the country.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper aims to analyze the influence of foreign trade sizes on economic growth.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In accordance with improved growth rates generated by this positive effect HLM approach also provides information towards an increase of foreign trade deficits.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:With findings of this study, outward-oriented growth strategy depends on the terms of trade are in favor of the country.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Harberger-Laursen-Metzler Etkisi · Obstfeld-Razin-Svensson Etkisi · Markov Rejim Değişim Yaklaşımı

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the influence of foreign trade sizes on economic growth. Theoretical framework of this study rests on Harberger-Laursen-Metzler (HLM) and Obstfeld-Razin-Svensson (ORS) effect approaches. Approach of HLM indicates that any setback in foreign trade size of a country causes a favorable effect on foreign trade deficit of that country. In accordance with improved growth rates generated by this positive effect HLM approach also provides information towards an increase of foreign trade deficits. This approach is known as S-Curve in academic literature. ORS approach on the other hand, opposes that improvements in foreign trade sizes become effective on economic growth with perceptions related with continuity of shock happening to foreign trade sizes.With this context, positive and negative effects of foreign trade sizes on economic growth are examined via Markov Variation technique. In the analysis, manufacturing industry production index is taken as indicator of economic growth whereas foreign trade sizes are taken as regimen or transitional parameter. With findings of this study, outward-oriented growth strategy depends on the terms of trade are in favor of the country.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı dış ticaret hadlerinin ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkisini analiz etmektir. Bu çalışmanın teorik temeli Harberger-Laursen-Metzler (HLM) ve Obstfeld-Razin-Svensson (ORS) etkisi yaklaşımlarına dayanmaktadır. HLM yaklaşımı dış ticaret hadlerindeki bir kötüleşmenin ülkenin dış ticaret açıkları üzerinde olumlu bir etkiye yol açacağını belirtmekte, bu olumlu gelişmenin ülkenin ekonomik büyümesi üzerinde yaratacağı etkiye bağlı olarak da dış ticaret açıklarında bir artışa neden olacağı yönünde bilgi sunmaktadır. Bu yaklaşım literatürde S Eğrisi olarak bilinmektedir. ORS yaklaşımı ise dış ticaret hadlerindeki bir şokun devamlılığı yönündeki algıya bağlı olarak dış ticaret hadlerindeki gelişmelerin ekonomik büyüme üzerinde etkili olacağını belirtmektedir.Bu kapsamda dış ticaret hadlerinin ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki pozitif ve negatif etkisi Markov Değişim Tekniği yaklaşımıyla incelenmektedir. Analizde ekonomik büyümenin göstergesi olarak imalat sanayi üretim endeksi, rejim veya geçiş değişkeni olarak da dış ticaret hadleri kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın bulgularına göre dışa açık ekonomik büyüme stratejisi dış ticaret hadlerinin ülke lehine olmasına bağlıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

EKİNCİ, R., TÜZÜN, O., KAHYAOĞLU, H. (2015). The Relationship of Terms of Trade and Economic Growth: The Turkish Case. Optimum Ekonomi ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2. https://ajindex.com/articles/82867

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akgül, I., Koç S., ve Koç S. Ö. (2007). Cari İşlemler Dengesi Rejim Değişim Modelleri İle Modellenebilir mi? 8. Türkiye Ekonometri ve İstatistik Kongresi, 24-25,
  2. Mayıs, Malatya. Backus, D. K., Kehoe, P. J., & Kydland, F. E. (1994). Dynamics of the Trade Balance and the Terms of Trade: The J Curve. American Economic Review, Vol.84, No.1, pp. 84-103. http://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/Workpaper/1992/wp9211.pdf, Erişim tarihi: 10.08.2012
  3. Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Ratha, A. (2009). S-Curve Dynamics of Trade: Evidence from US-Canada Commodity Trade. Economic Issues Journal Articles, Economic Issues, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16.
  4. Bean, C. (1986).
  5. The Terms of Trade, Labor Supply, and the Current Account. Economic Journal of Supplement, 96: 38-46.
  6. Bleaney, M., & Greenaway, D. (2001). The Impact of Terms of Trade and Real Exchange Rate Volatility on Investment And Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Development Economics, 65, 491–500.
  7. Bouakez, H., & Kano, T. (2008). Terms of trade and current account fluctuations: The Harberger–Laursen–Metzler effect revisited. Journal Of Macroeconomics, 30260-281.
  8. Cakir, M. (2009, Kasım). Terms of Trade and Economic Growth of Emerging Market Economies.The International Conference on Administration and Business University of Bucharest. Calderón, C., Chong A., & Loayza, N. (1999). Determinants of Current Account Deficits in Developing Countries. Working Paper 51, Central Bank of Chile. Cashin, P., & McDermott, J. (1998). Terms of Trade and the Current Account. IMF Working Paper, Kasım, 177. Davidson J. Time Series Modelling Version 4.24, Main Document, University of Exeter. Davies, N., & Joseph D. P. (1986). Detecting Non-Linearity In Time Series, The Statistician, C. XXXV, No:2, s. 274. De Holanda, F. (2000). Taxa de Cambio e Poupanca: Um Ensaio sobre o Efeito Harberger-Laursen-Metzler. http://www.econofinance.com/papers/barbosa1.htm. Erişim tarihi: 05.08.2012
  9. Edwards, S. (1989). Temporary Terms-of-trade Disturbances, the Real Exchange Rate and the Current Account. Economica 56: 343-57. http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2554282.pdf?acceptTC=true, Erişim tarihi: 25.07.2012
  10. Eicher T.S., Schubert S.F., & Turnovsky S.J. (2008). Dynamic Effects of Terms of Trade Shocks: The Impact on Debt and Growth. Journal of International Money and Finance, Vol. 27: 876-896.
  11. Gavin, M. (1990). Structural Adjustment to a Terms of Trade Disturbance: The Role of Relative Prices. Journal of International Economics 28: 217-243.
  12. Goldfeld, S. M., ve Quandt. R.