Journals / Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3

Bank Efficiency and Stock Returns in the Turkish Stock Market: A Two-stage Analysis Approach

Türk Hisse Senetleri Piyasasında Banka Etkinliği ve Getiri: İki Aşamalı Bir Analiz

Pages
1001–1018
Publication Date
2020-11-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This may be explained with the side effects of increasing intermediation in the short run as the increasing non-performing loans and decreasing profitability in the long run.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study researches the effects of bank efficiency changes of returns in Turkish stock markets using a two-stage model for the period of 2002-2017.
📊
Key Findings & Data:First stage indicates that efficiency increased until 2010, and then a considerable decrease was observed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This may be explained with the side effects of increasing intermediation in the short run as the increasing non-performing loans and decreasing profitability in the long run.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2002-2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Veri Zarflama Analizi · Malmquist Verimlilik Endeksi · Panel ARDL

Abstract

This study researches the effects of bank efficiency changes of returns in Turkish stock markets using a two-stage model for the period of 2002-2017. First, Malmquist Productive Index is employed to measure the different dimensions of efficiency; then, static and dynamic panel data models are used to investigate the effects of efficiency changes. First stage indicates that efficiency increased until 2010, and then a considerable decrease was observed. Second stage proves that together with market itself efficiency change has explanatory power on stock return. Effect of increase in profitability efficiency is positive in the long run while effect of intermediation is positive in the short but negative in the long run. This may be explained with the side effects of increasing intermediation in the short run as the increasing non-performing loans and decreasing profitability in the long run.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, 2002-2017 döneminde Türk hisse senedi piyasalarında, banka etkinliğindeki değişimin getiriler üzerinde etkili olup olmadığı, araştırılmaktadır. Önce Malmquist Verimlilik Endeksi ile etkinlik farklı boyutları ile hesaplanmış; daha sonra statik ve dinamik panel veri yöntemleri ile etkinlik değişiminin etkileri incelenmiştir. İlk aşama, banklarda etkinliğin 2010 yılına kadar art-tığını, sonrasında önemli derecede azaldığını göstermektedir. İkinci aşama, piyasanın ve etkinlikteki değişimin getiri üzerinde etkili olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Karlılık etkinliği uzun dönemde olumlu; diğer taraftan aracılık etkinliği kısa dönemde olumlu ancak uzun dönemde olumsuz etkiye sahiptir. Bu durum aracılık etkinliğinin artması sonucu uzun vadede tak-ipteki kredi oranının artması ve karlılığın azalması ile açıklanabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KALE, S., EKEN, M. H., KAYA, İ. G. (2020). Bank Efficiency and Stock Returns in the Turkish Stock Market: A Two-stage Analysis Approach. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3, 1001–1018. https://ajindex.com/articles/82634

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Avkiran, Necmi K. (2011). "Association of Dea Super-Efficiency Estimates with Financial Ratios: Investigating the Case for Chinese Banks." Omega, 39(3), 323-34.
  2. Banker, Rajiv D; Abraham Charnes and William Wager Cooper. (1984). "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis." Management science, 30(9), 1078-92.
  3. Berger, Allen N. and David B. Humphrey. (1997). "Efficiency of Financial Institutions: International Survey and Directions for Future Research." European Journal of Operational Research, 98(2), 175-212.
  4. Blackburne, Edward F and Mark W Frank. (2007). "Estimation of Nonstationary Heterogeneous Panels." The Stata Journal, 7(2), 197-208.
  5. Burmeister, Edwin; Richard Roll; Stephen A. Ross; Edwin J. Elton; Martin J. Gruber; Richard Grinold and Ronald N. Kahn. (1994). "A Practitioner's Guide to Factor Models," USA: Research Foundation of CFA Institute, Casu, Barbara; Claudia Girardone and Philip Molyneux. (2004). "Productivity Change in European Banking: A Comparison of Parametric and Non-Parametric Approaches." Journal of Banking & Finance, 28(10), 2521-40.
  6. Chan, Sok-Gee and Mohd Zaini Abd Karim. (2014). "Bank Efficiency and Stock Returns in Selected Asean Countries." Argumenta Oeconomica, 2(33), 5-21.
  7. Charnes, Abraham; William W Cooper and Edwardo Rhodes.(1978). "Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units." European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-44.
  8. Chu, Sing Fat and Guan Hua Lim. (1998). "Share Performance and Profit Efficiency of Banks in an Oligopolistic Market: Evidence from Singapore." Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 8(2–3), 155-68.
  9. Cooper, William W; Lawrence M Seiford and Kaoru Tone. (2007). "Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and Dea-Solver Software," New York, USA: Springer-Verlag, Erdem, Cumhur and Meziyet Sema Erdem. (2008). "Turkish Banking Efficiency and Its Relation to Stock Performance." Applied Economics Letters, 15(3), 207-11.
  10. Fethi, Meryem Duygun and Fotios Pasiouras. (2010). "Assessing Bank Efficiency and Performance with Operational Research and Artificial Intelligence Techniques: A Survey." European Journal of Operational Research, 204(2), 189-98.
  11. Fiordelisi, Franco. (2007). "Shareholder Value Efficiency in European Banking." Journal of Banking & Finance, 31(7), 2151-71.
  12. Fiordelisi, Franco and Phil Molyneux. (2010). "Total Factor Productivity and Shareholder Returns in Banking." Omega, 38(5), 241-53.
  13. Fu, Xi