SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İzmir İktisat Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 3

Impact of Macroeconomic Indicators on Export Competitiveness in Shanghai Cooperation Organization Countries

Şanghay İşbirliği Örgütü Ülkelerinde Makroekonomik Göstergelerin İhracat Rekabet Gücüne Etkisi

Birol ERKAN
Oğuz KARA
Elif Tuğçe BOZDUMAN
Pages
443–455
Publication Date
2020-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, only the current account deficit variable has negative effect on the competitiveness of crude materials except fuels product groups.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of the study is to determine macroeconomic indicators affecting export competitiveness of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the study covering the period 2000-2017, Balassa index was used to determine the export competitiveness of these countries.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, only the current account deficit variable has negative effect on the competitiveness of crude materials except fuels product groups.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000-2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Şanghay İşbirliği Örgütü · İhracat Rekabet Gücü · AMG Tahmincisi

Abstract

The aim of the study is to determine macroeconomic indicators affecting export competitiveness of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) countries. In the study covering the period 2000-2017, Balassa index was used to determine the export competitiveness of these countries. In the study, the effect of various macroeconomic indicators on export competitiveness of the SCO countries was analyzed using the AMG estimator. According to the results, only the current account deficit variable has negative effect on the competitiveness of crude materials except fuels product groups. Only the per capita income variable has a negative effect on the export competitiveness of the main manufacturing goods.

Özet

Çalışmanın amacı Şanghay İşbirliği Örgütü (ŞİÖ) üyesi ülkelerinin ihracat rekabet gücünü etkileyen makroekonomik göstergelerin saptanmasıdır. 2000-2017 dönemini kapsayan çalışmada, ülkelerin ihracat rekabet gücünün saptanması için Balassa indeksi kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada, çeşitli makroekonomik göstergelerin ŞİÖ ülkelerinin ihracat rekabet gücü üzerindeki etkisi AMG tahmincisi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, sadece cari açık değişkeni yakıt ürün grupları dışındaki ham maddelerin rekabet gücü üzerinde olumsuz yönde etkilidir. Başlıca imalat mallarının ihracat rekabet gücü üzerinde ise sadece kişi başına düşen gelir değişkeni olumsuz yönde etkilidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERKAN, B., KARA, O., BOZDUMAN, E. T. (2020). Impact of Macroeconomic Indicators on Export Competitiveness in Shanghai Cooperation Organization Countries. İzmir İktisat Dergisi, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 3, 443–455. https://ajindex.com/articles/82624

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. ALIU, F., KNAPKOVA, A., MUSOLLI, N. (2017). Modeling the Fundamental Value of a Company: a Case Study of Electricity Distribution and Supply Company (keds). The 4th International Conference on Finance and Economics (225-236). Vietnam: ICFE. AMAR, M. B., HAMDI, M. T. (2012). Global Competitiveness and Economic Growth: Empirical Verification for African Countries. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 4(6), 125-131.
  2. AUZINA-EMSINAA, A. (2014).
  3. Labour Productivity, Economic Growth and Global Competitiveness in Post-Crisis Period. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 156, 317-321.
  4. BALASSA, B. (1965). Trade Liberalisation and "Revealed" Comparative Advantage. The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 99-123.
  5. BALASSA, B., NOLAND, M. (1989). Revealed Comparative Advantage in Japan and the United States. Journal of International Economic Integration, 4(2), 8-22.
  6. BAUMANN, C. (2011). The role of culture, competitiveness and economic performance in explaining academic performance: a global market analysis for international student segmentation. Journal of Marketing For Higher Education, 21(2), 181-201.
  7. CAZACU, A.-M. (2015). Determinants of Non-performing Loans Ratio. Evidence from Firm-level Data. International Finance and Banking Conference (354-358).
  8. Bucharest, Romania: IFBA. EBERHARDT, M., BOND, S. (2009). Cross-section dependence in nonstationary panel models: a novel estimator. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, 1-26.
  9. FAFALIOU, I., POLEMIS, M. L. (2013). Competitiveness of the Euro Zone Manufacturing: A Panel Data Analysis. International Advances in Economic Research, 19, 45-61.
  10. GERNI, C. et al. (2013). The Analysis of Competitiveness and Economic Growth: A Case Study of Transition Countries. International Business Research, 6(5), 117-122.
  11. GHERMAN, A. et al. (2013). Exchange rate volatility effects on export competitiveness: Romanian Case. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 20, 39-50.
  12. HINLOOPEN, J., MARREWIJK, C. V. (2001). On the empirical distribution of the Balassa Index. Review of World Economics, 137(1), 1-35.
  13. İLGÜN, M. F. (2016). Mali Sürdürülebilirlik: OECD Ülkelerine Yönelik Panel Veri Analizi. Ataturk University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences 30(1), 69-90.
  14. KESKIN, H. İ., AKSOY, E. (2019). OECD ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde Gelir Artışı ve İşgücüne Katılım Arasındaki İlişki: Panel Eşbütünleşme Analizi. Third Sector Social Economic Review, 54(1), 1-20.
  15. KORDALSKA, A., OLCZYK, M. (2016). Global Competitiveness and Eco