Journals / Acta Aquatica Turcica / 2020 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3

Seasonal changes of water quality of Murat River (Bingol, Turkey) in terms of physicochemical and biological parameters

Murat Nehri'nin (Bingöl, Türkiye) Su Kalitesinin, Fizikokimyasal ve Biyolojik Parametreler Açısından Mevsimsel Değişimi

Pages
305–312
Publication Date
2019-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Considering all the results, it has been evaluated that there is no significant pollution problem in the Murat River.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Murat River is the most important tributary of the Euphrates River, which has the highest water potential in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The seasonal variation of water quality parameters and water quality status of Murat River were determined according to the “Regulation on Surface Water Quality Management” criteria. 19 different parameters were measured in water samples taken from four different stations during the research.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Considering all the results, it has been evaluated that there is no significant pollution problem in the Murat River.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Su kalitesi · Chl-a · BOİ

Abstract

Murat River is the most important tributary of the Euphrates River, which has the highest water potential in Turkey. The seasonal variation of water quality parameters and water quality status of Murat River were determined according to the “Regulation on Surface Water Quality Management” criteria. 19 different parameters were measured in water samples taken from four different stations during the research. These parameters were temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, electrical conductivity, total hardness, total alkalinity, Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), total phosphorus, fluoride, chloride, nitrite, nitrate, ammonium, sulfate, sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, and chlorophyll-a (Chl-a). According to “Regulation on Surface Water Quality Management”, physical and chemical analysis data showed that Murat River waters had "first-class water quality" in terms of temperature, dissolved oxygen, BOD, total phosphorus, fluoride, chloride, nitrate, ammonium, sulfate, "third-class water quality" for sodium, pH and “fourth class water quality” for nitrite. The electrical conductivity and alkalinity values were within normal limits and as "medium-hard" water. Considering all the results, it has been evaluated that there is no significant pollution problem in the Murat River.

Özet

Murat Nehri, Türkiye'de en yüksek su potansiyeline sahip Fırat Nehri’nin en önemli koludur. Murat Nehri su kalitesi parametrelerinin mevsimsel değişimi ve su kalitesi durumu “yüzey suyu kalite yönetmeliği” kriterlerine göre tespit edilmiştir. Araştırma sürecinde dört farklı istasyondan alınan su örneklerinde sıcaklık, pH, çözünmüş oksijen, elektriksel iletkenlik, toplam sertlik, toplam alkalinite, Biyokimyasal Oksijen İhtiyacı (BOİ), toplam fosfat, florür, klorür, nitrit, nitrat, amonyum, sülfat, sodyum, potasyum, kalsiyum, magnezyum ve klorofil-a (Chl-a) ölçülmüştür. Yüzey suyu kalite yönetmeliğine göre, Murat Nehri sıcaklık, çözünmüş oksijen, BOİ, toplam fosfat, florür, klorür, nitrat, amonyum, sülfat açısından "birinci sınıf" , sodyum, pH için "üçüncü sınıf" , ve nitrit için "dördüncü sınıf" su kalitesine sahipti. Elektriksel iletkenlik ve alkalilik değerleri normal sınırlarda ve "orta sert" su olarak kabul edildi. Tüm sonuçlar dikkate alındığında, Murat Nehrinde önemli bir kirlilik sorunu olmadığı tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOYUN, M., ULUPINAR, M., ÖZDEMİR, N. S., KIRICI, M., CAF, F. (2019). Seasonal changes of water quality of Murat River (Bingol, Turkey) in terms of physicochemical and biological parameters. Acta Aquatica Turcica, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3, 305–312. https://ajindex.com/articles/82107

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Abdelali, K.M., Taştan, Y., & Sönmez, A.Y. (2018). Investigation of Beyler Dam Lake water quality in terms of some physical and chemical parameters. Marine Science and Technology Bulletin, 7(1), 21-27.
  2. Akbay, N., Anul, N., Yerli, S., Soyupak, S., & Yurteri, C. (1999). Seasonal distribution large phytoplankton in the Keban Dam Reservoir. Journal of Plankton Research, 4, 771-787.
  3. Alam, S. (2010). Globalization, poverty and environmental degradation: sustainable development in Pakistan. Journal of Sustainable Development, 3(3), 103-114.
  4. Alp, M.T., Koçer, M.A.T., Sen, B., & Ozbay, O. (2010). Water quality of surface waters in Lower Euphrates Basin (Southeastern Anatolia, Turkey). Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 9(18), 2412-2421.
  5. Altın, A., Filiz, Z., & Iscen, C. F. (2009). Assessment of seasonal variations of surface water quality characteristics for Porsuk Stream. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 158, 51-65. APHA (American Public Health Association) (1998). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 20th ed., American Public Health Association, Washington, USA, p.541. Ates, F., Sheher, T., & Umron, T.U. (2016). Electrocoagulation of tissue paper wastewater and an evaluation of sludge for pyrolysis. Journal Desalination and Water Treatment, 57(59), 28724-28733.
  6. Atıcı, T., & Obalı, O. (1999). Water quality assesment and algae of Susuz Pond (Ankara). Gazi University Journal of Gazi Education Faculty, 19(3), 99-104.
  7. Barthram, J., & Ballance, R. (1996). Water Quality Monitoring; A Practical Guide to the Design and Implementation of Fresh Water Quality Studies and Monitoring Programmes. Chapman and Hall, London. Baykal, T., Acikgoz, I., Udoh, A.U., & Yildiz, K. (2011). Seasonal variations in phytoplankton composition and biomass in a small lowland river-lake system (Melen River, Turkey). Turkish Journal of Biology, 35, 485-501.
  8. Beaton, J.D, Roberts, T.L, Halstead, E.H., & Cowell, L.E. (1995). Global transfers of P in Fertilizer Materials and Agricultural Commodities. Phosphorus in The Global Environment: Transfers, Cycles And Management. John Wiley, New York, USA, p. 7-26.
  9. Bektaş, S., Yıldırım, A., & Becer, Ö.Z.A. (2011). Compression of some water quality parameters of the different trout streams in Çoruh Basin. Research Journal of Biological Sciences, 4(1), 61-66.
  10. Best, M.A., Wither, A.W., & Coates, S. (2007). Dissolved oxygen as a physico-chemical supporting element in the Water Framework Directive. Marine Pollution Bulletin,