Journals / Aquatic Research / 2022 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

Crustacean and Protozoan parasites of some Cyprinid fish living in the Murat River (Bingöl-Türkiye), with new host records

Pages
154–164
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of this study, for the first time, Protozoan and Crustacean parasites of different cyprinid fish were examined according to the host species, seasonal distribution, host size, and new host records were reported for three parasites.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Some Cyprinid fish species: Cyprinion macrostomum (Heckel, 1843), Capoeta umbla (Heckel, 1843), Chondrostoma regium (Heckel, 1843), and Squalius cephalus (Linnaeus, 1758) living naturally in the Murat River, were investigated for Protozoan and Crustacean parasite fauna and their distribution.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Fish samples were collected from different stations between July 2017 - June 2019, examined in the Bingöl University Zoology Research Laboratory, and the data were explained with various variables.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of this study, for the first time, Protozoan and Crustacean parasites of different cyprinid fish were examined according to the host species, seasonal distribution, host size, and new host records were reported for three parasites.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Some Cyprinid fish species: Cyprinion macrostomum (Heckel, 1843), Capoeta umbla (Heckel, 1843), Chondrostoma regium (Heckel, 1843), and Squalius cephalus (Linnaeus, 1758) living naturally in the Murat River, were investigated for Protozoan and Crustacean parasite fauna and their distribution. Fish samples were collected from different stations between July 2017 - June 2019, examined in the Bingöl University Zoology Research Laboratory, and the data were explained with various variables. The normality test revealed that the data were not normally distributed (p< 0.05), as with large samples, so non-parametric tests explained the data. A total of 365 fish were examined, and 100 fish (27.4%) were infected with at least one Protozoan or Crustacean parasite. Four different parasite species were recorded on the examined fish, namely Ichthyophthirius multifiliis and Trichodina sp. belonging to the phylum Ciliophora (Protozoan), Ergasilus sieboldi, and Lamproglena pulchella belonging to the phylum Arthropoda (Crustacean). As a result of this study, for the first time, Protozoan and Crustacean parasites of different cyprinid fish were examined according to the host species, seasonal distribution, host size, and new host records were reported for three parasites.

🔖

Cite This Article

KORKUT, N., KOYUN, M. (2022). Crustacean and Protozoan parasites of some Cyprinid fish living in the Murat River (Bingöl-Türkiye), with new host records. Aquatic Research, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 154–164. https://ajindex.com/articles/413537

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akbeniz, E., Soylu, E. (2008). Metazoan parasites of tench (Tinca tinca L., 1758) in the lake Sapanca, Turkey. Aquatic Sciences and Engineering, 23(2), 13-18.
  2. Aydoğdu, A., Öztürk, M.O., Oğuz, M.C., Altunel, F.N. (2001). Investigations on metazoon parasites of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L. 1758) in Dalyan Lagoon, Karacabey, Turkey. Acta Veterinaria (Beograd), 51(5/6), 351-358.
  3. Balta, F., Kayış, S., Altınok, İ. (2008). External Protozoan parasites in three trout species in the eastern Black Sea region of the Turkey: intensity, seasonality, and their treatments. Bulletin of the European Association of Fish Pathologists, 28, 157-162.
  4. Bingöl, A. (2018). Kürtün baraj gölünde bakteriyel ve paraziter balık patojenlerinin araştırılması. (Master's thesis, Rize: Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi/Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü/Su Ürünleri Anabilim Dalı. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11436/189
  5. Cengizler, İ. (2000). Balık Hastalıkları Ders Kitabı (Vol. 7). Adana: Çukurova Üniversitesi Su Ürünleri Fakültesi Yayınları.
  6. Çam, A. (2012). Bafra Balık Göllerinde (Kızılırmak Deltası, Samsun) Yaşayan ve İnvasiv Özellikteki Kaya Balıklarının Parazit Faunasının Konak ve Çevresel Faktörlere Göre Belirlenmesi ve Histopatolojisi. Master's thesis, Sinop Üniversitesi,
  7. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Su Ürünleri Yetiştiriciliği Ana Bilim Dalı, Sinop, Türkiye. Çelik, S.Y., Korun, J. (2018). Türkiye’ den Trichodinid Protozooan Trichodina heterodentata ve T. pediculus (Ciliophora: Trichodinidae) İçin Yeni Konak Kaydı. Kocatepe Veterinary Journal, 11(3), 245-254. https://doi.org/10.30607/kvj.424351
  8. Dove, A.D.M. (2007). URLhttps://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=25490075 (accessed 10. 01. 2022).
  9. Grabda, J. (1991). Marine Fish Parasitology. Weinheim; New York: VCH; Warszawa: PWN, Polish Scientific Publishers. ISBN: 3527268987 Kayış, Ş., Balta, F., Serezli, R., Er, A. (2013). Parasites on different ornamental fish species in Turkey. Journal of FisheriesSciences.com, 7(2), 114-120. https://doi.org/10.3153/jfscom.2013012
  10. Kayış, Ş., Düzgün, A., Er, A. (2018). Bacterial and Parasitic Pathogens Isolated from Some Wild Cyprinid Fishes. El-Cezerî Journal of Science and Engineering, 5(3), 163-172. https://doi.org/10.31202/ecjse.422568
  11. Koyun, M., Korkut, N., Gül, A. (2019). Occurrence of endo and ectoparasites on Capoeta trutta (Heckel, 1843) and Acanthobrama marmid Heckel, 1843 (Cypriniformes: Cyprininae) inhabiting in Göynük Stream Eastern Anatolia. Biharean Biologist, 13(2), 94-100.
  12. Koyun, M., U