SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Çevresel Eğilimler Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Basic evaluation of engineering education and expectations

Mehmet Kemal GÖKAY
Pages
66–80
Publication Date
2020-12-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Educational methods aimed to reach “good engineers” in engineering faculties are given here to present importance of eternal, analytical and creative knowledge gained by engineering students.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Engineers have different responsibilities in different types of business.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Engineers are organising works and workplaces according to those profession requires.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Educational methods aimed to reach “good engineers” in engineering faculties are given here to present importance of eternal, analytical and creative knowledge gained by engineering students.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Engineering education · real-world engineers · methods for engineering education

Abstract

Engineers have different responsibilities in different types of business. Engineers are organising works and workplaces according to those profession requires. In certain jobs they are hired for their design and new innovative powers to create new fields to their companies in competitive businesses. Therefore, engineers should be graduated to handle their actual responsibilities. After realising some deficits in engineering education, some engineering faculties have reshaped their education and covered more design and problem solving activities. Graduating engineers in changing world in technology and population requires “engineers” who can meet technological and social rule changes. They should have deep knowledge in their subjects and creative design abilities. Educational methods aimed to reach “good engineers” in engineering faculties are given here to present importance of eternal, analytical and creative knowledge gained by engineering students.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKAY, M. K. (2020). Basic evaluation of engineering education and expectations. Uluslararası Çevresel Eğilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 66–80. https://ajindex.com/articles/815380

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Engineering, www.wikipedia.com, Accessed Feb. 2019
  2. About IAENG, Int. Assoc. of Engineers, www.iaeng.org/about_IAENG.html, iaeng.org, Accessed Nov. 2019
  3. Engineering, Reference terms, www.sciencedaily.com/terms/ engineering.htm, Accessed Dec. 2019
  4. S. Costa and M. Scoble, An Interdisciplinary approach to integrating sustainability into mining engineering education and research, The Journal of Clean Production, 14(3-4), pp.366-373, 2006
  5. Natural Resources Canada, www.nrcan.gc.ca/home, Accessed Nov. 2019
  6. S. Singer and K.A. Smith, Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering, Journal of Engineering Education, 102(4), pp. 468–471, 2013, doi:10.1002/jee.20030
  7. J.E. Froyd, P.C. Wankat and K.A. Smith, Five major shifts in 100 years of engineering education, Proceedings of the IEEE 100 (Special Centennial issue), May 2012, pp. 1344-1360, doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2012.2190167
  8. J. Joshua Cruz and N. Kellam, Beginning an Engineer’s Journey: A narrative examination of How, When, and Why students choose the Engineering Major, Journal of Engineering Education, 107(4), pp.556–582, 2018, doi:10.1002/jee.20234
  9. Engineering education strategic aims, Cambridge University, www.cu.edu.uk, Accessed Feb. 2019
  10. Personalized learning, tutorials. Oxford university, www.ox.edu.uk, Accessed Feb. 2019
  11. P. Ramsden, Learning to teach in higher education, Routledge, London, Published in Taylor&Francis e-library, p.305, 1992
  12. Characteristics of good teaching, University of Technology Sydney, www.uts.edu.au, Accessed Feb. 2019
  13. G. Gibbs and T. Habeshaw, An Introduction to Effective Teaching in Higher Education, Technical and Educational Services limited, p.259, 1989
  14. J.E. Mills and D.F. Treagust, Engineering education: Is problem based or project based learning the answer. Australasian J. of Engng. Education, Online publication, 2003-04, http://www.aaee.com.au/journal/2003/ mills_treagust03.pdf [15] F.K. Fink, Problem-based learning in engineering education: a catalyst for regional industrial development, World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 1(1), pp.29-32, 2002
  15. DMA-Research, Graduate Analysis and Customer Analysis. Annex I and Annex II to [B. Dalum, M. Holmen, S. Jacobsson, M. Praest, A. Rickne and G. Villumsen, Changing the Regional System of Innovation, (eds; J.Fagerberg, P. Guerrieri and B. Verspagen, 1999], 1997, (in Danish)