SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ulisa: Uluslararası Çalışmalar Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Breaking the Ice: Recent Administrative Reforms in Brazil

Brezilya'da Yeni İdari Reformlar

Mehmet Metin UZUN
Pages
35–51
Publication Date
2021-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This article aims to examine the reform movements in Brazil's new public management (NPM) and governance framework and analyze the fundamental dynamics of Brazilian public administration reform in a theoretical framework.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Brazil has been shown as one of the superpowers of this century, beyond being a "coffee and football" country.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this perspective, Brazil is a unique country with a federal structure consisting of 26 states and many local units, management, and reform movements.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This article aims to examine the reform movements in Brazil's new public management (NPM) and governance framework and analyze the fundamental dynamics of Brazilian public administration reform in a theoretical framework.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Brezilya · İdari reform · Kamu yönetimi

Abstract

Brazil has been shown as one of the superpowers of this century, beyond being a "coffee and football" country. The role of public administration reforms in the development of Brazil is remarkable. In this perspective, Brazil is a unique country with a federal structure consisting of 26 states and many local units, management, and reform movements. This article will examine the various dimensions of contemporary public administration reforms (marketization, civil society, civil service, performance management, intergovernmental) from Brazil's perspective. This article aims to examine the reform movements in Brazil's new public management (NPM) and governance framework and analyze the fundamental dynamics of Brazilian public administration reform in a theoretical framework.

Özet

Brezilya, “kahve ve futbol” ülkesi olmanın ötesinde, gelecek yüzyılın süper güçlerinden biri olarak gösterilmektedir. Brezilya'nın kalkınmasında kamu yönetimi reformlarının rolü dikkat çekicidir. Çünkü Brezilya, 26 eyalet ve birçok yerel birimden oluşan federal yapısı, yönetim kültürü ve reform hareketleri ile benzersiz bir ülkedir. Bu makale, Brezilya çağdaş kamu yönetimi reformlarının çeşitli boyutlarını (özelleştirme, sivil toplum, kamu hizmeti, performans yönetimi, yerel yönetim vs.) inceleyecektir. Bu çalışmanın amacı ise, Brezilya'nın yeni kamu işletmeciliği (YKİ) ve yönetişim çerçevesindeki reform sürecini ele almak ve Brezilya idari reform hareketinin temel dinamiklerini teorik çerçevede analiz etmektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

UZUN, M. M. (2021). Breaking the Ice: Recent Administrative Reforms in Brazil. Ulisa: Uluslararası Çalışmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 35–51. https://ajindex.com/articles/813725

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Abbo, Usman, and Kabiru Maitama Kura. 2018. “Comparative Administrative Reforms; Nigeria, Malaysia, Philippines and Brazil.” Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance: 1–10.
  2. Akkoyunlu, K. (2018). The Civil Service in Brazil and Turkey: A Comparative Study. Escola Nacional de Administração Pública (Enap), 9–31.
  3. Andrews, Christina W. 2008. “Legitimacy And Context: Implications For Public Sector Reform In Developing Countries.” Public Administration and Development 28: 171–80.
  4. Avritzer, L. (2012). Sociedade civil e Estado no Brasil: da autonomia à interdependência política. OPINIÃO PÚBLICA, 18(2), 383–398.
  5. Aydın, G., Nyadera, I.N. & Önder, M. (2020). Strategic Management in Turkey’s Public Sector: Reforms and Application Issues. Public Organization Review: Global journal, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-020-00463-8
  6. Bresser Pereira L. Ca. (1997). Managerial Public Administration: Strategy and Structure for a New State, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 20(1), 7-23, DOI: 10.1080/01603477.1997.11490136 https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.1997.11490136
  7. Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (2003). The 1995 Public Management Reform in Brazil Reflections Of A Reformer. 89–109.
  8. Bresser-pereira, L.C, Ben, I., Schneider, R., & Heredia, B. (2002). The 1995 Public Management Reform In Brazil: Reflections Of A Reformer. Bresser-pereira, L.C. (2001). “New Public Management Reform: Now in the Latin America Agenda, and Yet.” Programa de Estudos Políticos (September): 117–40.
  9. Cavalcante, P. (2018). Innovations in the Federal Government During the Post-new Public Management Era. ANPAD, 885–902. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2018170391%0AInnovations
  10. Cavalcante, Pedro, and Paulo Carvalho. 2017. “The Professionalization of Brazilian Federal Bureaucracy ( 1995-2014 ): Advances and Dilemmas.” 51(1): 1–26.
  11. Costa, F. L. da. (2008). Brasil: 200 anos de Estado; 200 anos de administração pública; 200 anos de reformas. Revista De Administraçao Publica (RAP), 42(5), 830–874.
  12. Ensslin L., Ensslin S., Borgert A. D., & Lyrio, M. V. L. (2006). Gerenciamento do Desempenho da Secretaria de Desenvolvimento Regional da Grande Florianópolis: Uma Proposta Advinda da Combinação do Balanced Scorecard e da Metodologia Multicritério de Apoio à Decisão Construtivista. ENAPG, 22(24), 1–16.
  13. Estache, A., Goldstein, A., & Pittman, R. (2001). Privatization and Regulatory Reform in Brazil: The Case of Freight Filgueiras, F. (2018). Going beyond management: the ag