Journals / Ulisa: Uluslararası Çalışmalar Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1

A ‘Modern’ Religious Approach to Secularism and Democracy: Philosophy of Abdolkarim Soroush

Sekülerizm ve Demokrasiye ‘Modern’ Bir Dini Yaklaşım: Abdolkarim Soroush'un Felsefesi

Pınar Arıkan-Sinkaya(AKDENİZ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İKTİSADİ VE İDARİ BİLİMLER FAKÜLTESİ)0009-0008-3507-7020
Pages
16–28
Publication Date
2026-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It argues that his ideas offer an important perspective on the compatibility of Islam, modernity, secularism, and democratic governance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article examines the changing relationship between secularism and religion in both Western and Islamic societies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:While secularization theory once predicted the decline of religion as a consequence of modernity, the late twentieth century witnessed a revival of religious engagement in public life.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It argues that his ideas offer an important perspective on the compatibility of Islam, modernity, secularism, and democratic governance.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Abdülkerim Suruş · Sekülerleşme · Din

Abstract

This article examines the changing relationship between secularism and religion in both Western and Islamic societies. While secularization theory once predicted the decline of religion as a consequence of modernity, the late twentieth century witnessed a revival of religious engagement in public life. At the same time, parts of the Islamic world began exploring ways to reconcile religion with modernity and secularization. Against this backdrop, the article focuses on the thought of Abdolkarim Soroush, one of Iran’s leading religious reformers. It argues that his ideas offer an important perspective on the compatibility of Islam, modernity, secularism, and democratic governance.

Özet

Bu makale, Batı ve İslam toplumlarında sekülarizm ile din arasındaki değişen ilişkiyi incelemektedir. Sekülerleşme teorisi bir zamanlar modernitenin kaçınılmaz sonucu olarak dinin gerileyeceğini öngörmüş olsa da, yirminci yüzyılın sonlarında dinin kamusal hayatta yeniden canlanmasına tanıklık edilmiştir. Aynı dönemde İslam dünyasının bazı kesimlerinde din ile modernite ve sekülerleşme arasında uzlaşma yolları aranmaya başlanmıştır. Bu bağlamda makale, İran’ın önde gelen dinî reformcularından Abdülkerim Suruş’un düşüncelerine odaklanmaktadır. Çalışma, Suruş’un fikirlerinin İslam, modernite, sekülarizm ve demokratik yönetişim arasındaki uyumluluğa ilişkin önemli bir perspektif sunduğunu ileri sürmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Arıkan-Sinkaya, P. (2026). A ‘Modern’ Religious Approach to Secularism and Democracy: Philosophy of Abdolkarim Soroush. Ulisa: Uluslararası Çalışmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1, 16–28. https://ajindex.com/articles/1563236

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (33)

  1. Berger, P. L. (1969). The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion. Anchor Books.
  2. Berger, P. L. (2000). Secularism in Retreat. In J. Esposito & A. Tamimi (Eds.), Islam and Secularism in the Middle East (pp. 38–51). NYU Press.
  3. Biography. (2026). AbdolKarim Soroush. https://www.drsoroush.com/Biography-E.htm
  4. Boroujerdi, M. (1996). Iranian Intellectuals and the West: The Tormented Triumph of Nativism. Syracuse University Press.
  5. Casanova, J. (1994). Public Religions in the Modern World. University of Chicago Press.
  6. Dabashi, H. (2007). Iran: A People Interrupted. The New Press.
  7. Ghamari-Tabrizi, B. (2018). Abdolkarim Soroush. In J. L. Esposito & E. E.-D. Shahin (Eds.), Key Islamic Political Thinkers (pp. 219–243). Oxford University Press.
  8. Hashas, M. (2014). Abdolkarim Soroush: The Neo-Muʿtazilite that Buries Classical Islamic Political Theology in Defence of Religious Democracy and Pluralism. Studia Islamica, 109(1), 147–173.
  9. Jahanbakhsh, F. (2001a). Abdolkarim Soroush New “Revival of Religious Sciences.” ISIM Newsletter, 8(1), 21–21.
  10. Jahanbakhsh, F. (2001b). Islam, Democracy and Religious Modernism in Iran, 1953-2000: From Bāzargān to Soroush. BRILL.
  11. Jalaeipour, H. R. (1997). The Iranian Islamic Revolution: Mass Mobilization and its Continuity during 1976-96, PhD. Dissertation [Royal Holloway, University of London]. https://www.drsoroush.com/English/On_DrSoroush/E-CMO-19970000-The_Emergence_of_a_Modern_Intellectual_Climate_and_the_Change_in_the_Ideological_Scene.html
  12. Martin, V. (1989). Islam and Modernism: The Iranian Revolution of 1906. I. B. Tauris & Co Ltd.
  13. Matin‐asgari, A. (1997). Abdolkarim Sorush and the secularization of Islamic thought in Iran. Iranian Studies, 30(1–2).
  14. Mcleod, H. (2000). Secularisation in Western Europe, 1848-1914. Macmillan.
  15. Oğuz, S., & Çakır, R. (1998). Hatemi’nin İran’ı. İletişim Yayınları. https://iletisim.com.tr/kitap/hatemi-nin-iran-i/7389
  16. Sadri, M. (2003). Sacral Defense of Secularism: Dissident Political Theology in Iran. In N. Nabavi (Ed.), Intellectual Trends in Twentieth-century Iran: A Critical Survey. University Press of Florida.
  17. Sadri, M., & Sadri, A. (2000). Introduction. In A. Soroush, Reason, Freedom, and Democracy in Islam: Essential Writings of Abdolkarim Soroush. (M. Sadri & A. Sadri, Eds. & Trans.). Oxford University Press.
  18. Saghafi, M. (2003). Crossing the Desert: Iranian Intellectuals after the Islamic Revolution. In N. Nabavi (Ed.), Intellectual Trends in Twentieth-century Iran: A Critical Survey. University Press of Florida.
  19. Salam Newspaper. (n.d.). Religious Pluralism: Kadivar, Soroush Debate. Retrieved June 5, 2026, from https://www.drsoroush.com/English/By_DrSoroush/E-CMB-19980409-Religious_Pluralism-Kadivar-Soroush_Debate.html
  20. Schirazi, A. (1997). The Constitution of Iran: Politics and the State in the Islamic Republic (J. O’Kane, Trans.). I. B. Tauris.
  21. Soroush, A. (1996, June 14). A conversation with Abdolkarim Soroush [Q-News International (British Muslim weekly), No 220-221]. https://www.drsoroush.com/English/Interviews/E-INT-19960614-A_conversation_with_Abdolkarim_Soroush.html
  22. Soroush, A. (2000a). Reason, Freedom, and Democracy in Islam: Essential Writings of Abdolkarim Soroush (M. Sadri & A. Sadri, Eds. & Trans.). Oxford University Press.
  23. Soroush, A. (2000b). Types of Religiosity (N. Mobasser, Trans.). Types of Religiosity, (50). https://www.drsoroush.com/English/By_DrSoroush/E-CMB-20000300-Types_of_Religiosity.html
  24. Soroush, A. (2004, May 28). Dr. Soroush’s “Muslim Democrat of the Year Award” Acceptance Speech. https://www.drsoroush.com/English/By_DrSoroush/E-CMB-20040528-Dr.Soroushs-Muslim_Democrat_of_the_Year_Award-Acceptance_Speech.html
  25. Soroush, A. (2006, August). Whither Religion in the Modern Age? (N. Mobasser, Trans.). Www.Drsoroush.Com. https://www.drsoroush.com/English/By_DrSoroush/E-CMB-WhitherReligionInTheModernAge.html
  26. Soroush, A. (2009). The Expansion of Prophetic Experience: Essays on Historicity, Contingency and Plurality in Religion (F. Jahanbakhsh, Ed.; N. Mobasser, Trans.). Brill.
  27. Soroush, A. (2009, September). September 2009 Letter from Soroush to Khamenei. Iran Human Rights Documentation Center. https://iranhrdc.org/september-2009-letter-from-soroush-to-khamenei/
  28. Stark, R. (1999). Secularization, R.I.P. Sociology of Religion, 60(3), 249–273. https://doi.org/10.2307/3711936
  29. Taylor, C. (1998). Modes of Secularism. In R. Bhargava (Ed.), Secularism and Its Critics. Oxford University Press.
  30. Vahdat, F. (2003). Post-Revolutionary Islamic Discourses on Modernity in Iran: Expansion and Contraction of Human Subjectivity. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 35(4), 599–631.
  31. Vakili, V. (1997). Debating Religion and Politics in Iran: The Political Thought of Abdolkarim Soroush (No. 2; Council of Foreign Relations Studies Department Occasional Paper Series). Council on Foreign Relations.
  32. Wallis, R., & Bruce, S. (1992). Secularization: The Orthodox Model. In S. Bruce (Ed.), Religion and Modernization: Sociologists and Historians Debate Secularization Thesis. Clarendon Press.
  33. Wright, R. (1997). Iran’s Greatest Political Challenge: Abdol Karim Soroush. World Policy Journal, 14(2), 67–74.