SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ulisa: Uluslararası Çalışmalar Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

China’s Proactive Strategy to Breach the Turn in Global Economic Order: Placing the Belt and Road Initiative in between Globalization and Regionalization Trends

Çin'in Proaktif Küresel Ekonomik Düzendeki Dönüşü Aşma Stratejisi: Kuşak ve Yol Girişimi'ni Küreselleşme ve Bölgeselleşme Trendleri Arasına Oturtmak

Sinan Caner YAMAK
Pages
96–104
Publication Date
2021-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is claimed that the BRI is a breakthrough attempt of China to breach the changing trend from globalization towards regionalization in the world economy started after the 2008 Financial Crisis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Since the Belt and Road Initiative is introduced, there has been an ongoing controversy on how to define its politicaleconomic character.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This paper suggests that the BRI should be considered as a proactive strategy of China in response to the changing dynamics in the global system, in accordance with China's particular domestic and international concerns.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is claimed that the BRI is a breakthrough attempt of China to breach the changing trend from globalization towards regionalization in the world economy started after the 2008 Financial Crisis.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Kuşak ve Yol Girişimi · Küreselleşme · ters Küreselleşme

Abstract

Since the Belt and Road Initiative is introduced, there has been an ongoing controversy on how to define its politicaleconomic character. This paper suggests that the BRI should be considered as a proactive strategy of China in response to the changing dynamics in the global system, in accordance with China's particular domestic and international concerns. Utilizing the discussions on globalization and regionalization, it reviews different approaches on the BRI and narrates the relevant arguments in a wider perspective. It is claimed that the BRI is a breakthrough attempt of China to breach the changing trend from globalization towards regionalization in the world economy started after the 2008 Financial Crisis.

Özet

İlan edildiğinden bu yana Kuşak ve Yol Girişimi'nin siyasal-iktisat karakterinin nasıl tanımlanacağına dair bir tartışma süregelmekte. Bu makale Kuşak ve Yol Girişimi'nin küresel düzendeki değişen dinamiklere karşılık Çin'in kendi ulusal ve uluslararsı öncelikleri doğrultusunda geliştirdiği proaktif bir strateji olarak değerlendirilmesi gerektiğini önerir. Literatürdeki mevcut argümanları özetleyerek tarihsel bir perspektifin içine yerleştirir. Kuşak ve Yol Girişimi'nin Çin'in 2008 Finansal Krizi sonrası dünya ekonomisindeki küreselleşmeden bölgeselleşmeye doğru değişen trendi aşma projesi olduğunu savunur.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAMAK, S. C. (2021). China’s Proactive Strategy to Breach the Turn in Global Economic Order: Placing the Belt and Road Initiative in between Globalization and Regionalization Trends. Ulisa: Uluslararası Çalışmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 96–104. https://ajindex.com/articles/813719

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Alon, I., Zhang, W., & Lattemann, C. (2018).
  2. Introduction. In W. Zhang, I. Alon, & C. Lattemann (Eds.), China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Changing the Rules of Globalization (pp. 1–13). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75435-2_1
  3. Andornino, G. B. (2017). The Belt and Road Initiative in China’s Emerging Grand Strategy of Connective Leadership. China and World Economy, 25(5), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12211
  4. Aoyama, R. (2016). “One Belt, One Road”: China’s New Global Strategy. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 5(2), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/24761028.2016.11869094
  5. Baldwin, R., & Martin, P. (1999). Two Waves of Globalization: Superficial Similarities, Fundamental Differences. In Globalization and Labor (No. 6904). http://www.nber.org/papers/w6904
  6. Cai, K. G. (2018). The One Belt One Road and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: Beijing’s New Strategy of Geoeconomics and Geopolitics. Journal of Contemporary China, 27(114), 831–847. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2018.1488101
  7. Enderwick, P., & Buckley, P. J. (2020). Rising regionalization: will the post-COVID-19 world see a retreat from globalization? Transnational Corporations, 27(2), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.18356/8008753a-en
  8. Ferguson, N., & Schularick, M. (2007). ‘Chimerica’ and the Global Asset Market Boom. International Finance, 10(3), 215–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2362.2007.00210.x
  9. Gao, M. H. (2018). Globalization 5.0 Led by China: Powered by Positive Frames for BRI. In China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Changing the Rules of Globalization (pp. 321–335). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75435-2_17
  10. Gul, S., Umer, S., & Malik, M. S. (2018). China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI): Debt Quagmire or a Ridge Rope for Struggling Economies. Global Economics Review, III(I), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.31703/ger.2018(III-I).07
  11. He, Y. (2017). China’s new role in global governance: Shaping the emerging world order. China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies, 3(3), 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2377740017500221
  12. Holslag, J. (2017). How China’s New Silk Road Threatens European Trade. The International Spectator, 52(1), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2017.1261517
  13. Hui, Z., Qiangming, Y., & Li, N. (2021). BRI Infrastructure Development and Economic Growth. China Economist, 16(3), 26–61. https://doi.org/10.19602/j.chinaeconomist.2021.05.02
  14. Jones, H. (2010). CHINAMERICA: The Uneasy Partnership that Wi