Journals / Turkish Journal of Kinesiology / 2018 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Perceived yoga exercise benefits and barriers of university students by gender: Results of a survey research

Pages
39–46
Publication Date
2018-06-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Hence, in creating yoga exercise intervention for university students, gender is not a vital component to consider.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was conducted to explore perceived yoga exercise benefits and barriers of university students based on their gender.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Participants (n=210) were university of Malaya undergraduate students from faculty of education in Kuala Lumpur.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Hence, in creating yoga exercise intervention for university students, gender is not a vital component to consider.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Perceived benefits · perceived barriers · yoga

Abstract

This study was conducted to explore perceived yoga exercise benefits and barriers of university students based on their gender. Participants (n=210) were university of Malaya undergraduate students from faculty of education in Kuala Lumpur. The method of sampling was cluster random sampling. This study utilized a quantitative methodology research to investigate the perceived benefits and barriers towards yoga exercise among university students using the health belief model. This was a survey study of data collection. One-way MANOVA was used to determine the differences. Some 197 subjects completed the questionnaire and the results of inferential analysis demonstrated that males and females are similar in reporting perceived benefits in the Psychological dimension F (1,195) = .55, sig = .46 (p > .05), Physical dimension F (1,195) =.05, sig=.835 (p > .05), Disease Prevention dimension F(1,195)=1.11, sig = .29(p > .05), Social dimension F(1,195) =.09, sig = .92 (p > .05). They are also similar in reporting perceived barriers in the Negative Preconception dimension F (1,195) = .20, sig=.66 (p>.05), Cost dimension F(1,195) = 2.36, sig. =.13(p >.05), Time Prevention dimension F(1,195) = .71, sig =.40 >.05 and Fears dimension F(1,195) =.71, sig = .40(p > .05). This study tried to determine how students’ gender could influence their perceptions about yoga exercise. The results of this study show that males and female are similar in their perceived benefits and barriers to yoga exercise. Hence, in creating yoga exercise intervention for university students, gender is not a vital component to consider.

🔖

Cite This Article

KABİRİ, R., ALİ, S. K. S., HUTKEMRİ, Z. (2018). Perceived yoga exercise benefits and barriers of university students by gender: Results of a survey research. Turkish Journal of Kinesiology, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 39–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/809228

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Adewuya AO, Ola BA, Aloba OO, Mapayi BM, Oginni OO. Depression amongst Nigerian university students. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2006; 41(8): 674-678. American College Health Association. American College Health Association-National College health assessment II: Spring 2013 reference group executive summary. Retrieved from http://www.acha-ncha.org/docs/ACHA-NCHA-II_ReferenceGroup_ExecutiveSummary_Spring2013.pdf, 2013.
  2. Atkinson NL, Permuth-Levine R. Benefits, barriers, and cues to action of yoga practice: a focus group approach. Am J Health Behav 2009; 33(1): 3-14.
  3. Berger BG, Motl RW. Exercise and mood: A selective review and synthesis of research employing the profile of mood states. J Appl Sport Psychol 2000; 12(1): 69-92. Blair SN. Physical inactivity: The biggest public health problem of the 21st century. Br J Sports Med 2009; 43: 1–2.
  4. Chiuve SE, Rexrode KM, Spiegelman D, Logroscino G, Manson JE, Rimm EB. Primary prevention of stroke by healthy lifestyle. Circulation 2008; 118(9): 947-954.
  5. Colcombe S, Kramer AF. Fitness effects on the cognitive function of older adults a meta-analytic study. Psychol Sci 2003; 14(2): 125-130.
  6. Desai MN, Miller WC, Staples B, Bravender T. (2008). Risk factors associated with overweight and obesity in college students. J Am Coll Health 2008; 57: 109-113.
  7. Egli T, Bland HW, Melton BF, Czech DR. Influence of age, sex, and race on college students’ exercise motivation of physical activity. J Am Coll Health 2011; 59(5): 399-406.
  8. Grubbs L, Carter J. The relationship of perceived benefits and barriers to reported exercise behaviors in college undergraduates. Fam Community Health 2002; 25(2): 76-84.
  9. Gupta AK, Nguyen TT, Sanqui JAT. Characterization of the skew-normal distribution. Ann Inst Statist Math 2004; 56(2): 351-360.
  10. Gyurcsik NC, Bray SR, Brittain DR. Coping with barriers to vigorous physical activity during transition to university. Fam Community Health 2004; 27(2): 130-142. Iyengar BKS. Yoga: The path to holistic health. London, UK: Dorling Kindersley, 2001.
  11. Jeon CY, Lokken RP, Hu FB, Van Dam RM. Physical activity of moderate intensity and risk of Type 2 Diabetes: A systematic review. Diabetes Care 2007; 30(3): 744-752.
  12. Keating XD, Guan J, Pinero JC, Bridges DM. A meta-analysis of college students’ physical activity behaviors. J Am Coll Health 2005; 54: 116–125.
  13. Kelinske B, Mayer BW, Chen KL. Perceived benefits from participation in sports: A gender study. Women in Management Review 2001; 16(2): 75-84.
  14. Lerner J, Bur