Journals / The Journal of Social Science / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 7

SOCIO-ECONOMIC VARIABLES AND TAX COMPLIANCE IN THE SCOPE OF FISCAL SOCIOLOGY: A RESEARCH ON THE EUROPEAN UNION AND OECD

Pages
1–17
Publication Date
2020-02-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the analysis, the main point in increasing tax compliance is that the tax policies are adopted by the society, for this reason it is concluded that implementations that reflect the society need to be taken as a basis while making the regulations on the tax system.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Fiscal sociology investigates financial events from a sociological point of view and explores the effects of tax and spending policies on society and also the role and influence of the elements that constitute society in defining these policies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this respect, tax compliance and socio-economic variables that affect the structure of the society are included in the study and they are analyzed using panel data analysis covering the 2008-2016 time period by making comparisons between the European Union and OECD countries.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the analysis, the main point in increasing tax compliance is that the tax policies are adopted by the society, for this reason it is concluded that implementations that reflect the society need to be taken as a basis while making the regulations on the tax system.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008-2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Fiscal sociology · panel data analysis · tax compliance

Özet

Fiscal sociology investigates financial events from a sociological point of view and explores the effects of tax and spending policies on society and also the role and influence of the elements that constitute society in defining these policies. As the tax system and policies of each country reflect the characteristics of the country's social, political, cultural and economic structure, tax systems differ according to the characteristics of the structure of the society. Tax systems that are in line with the social structure ensure that tax compliance is achieved at a high level. From this point of view, aim of the study is defined as investigating the level of interaction of the structural elements with tax compliance. In this respect, tax compliance and socio-economic variables that affect the structure of the society are included in the study and they are analyzed using panel data analysis covering the 2008-2016 time period by making comparisons between the European Union and OECD countries. As a result of the analysis, the main point in increasing tax compliance is that the tax policies are adopted by the society, for this reason it is concluded that implementations that reflect the society need to be taken as a basis while making the regulations on the tax system.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERUL, R. D. (2020). SOCIO-ECONOMIC VARIABLES AND TAX COMPLIANCE IN THE SCOPE OF FISCAL SOCIOLOGY: A RESEARCH ON THE EUROPEAN UNION AND OECD. The Journal of Social Science, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 7, 1–17. https://ajindex.com/articles/806711

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Allingham, M. G. and Sandmo, A. (1972). “Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis”. Journal of Public Economics, 1, 323-338.
  2. Alm, J., Bernasconi, M., Laury, S., Lee, D. J., Wallace, S. (February 2016). “Culture, Compliance, and Confidentiality: A Study of Taxpayer Behavior in the United States and Italy”. University Ca’ Foscari of Venice, Dept. of Economics Research Paper Series, No. 36, 1-35.
  3. Alm, J., Jackson B. R. and Mckee, M. (March 1992). “Estimating The Determinants of Taxpayer Compliance With Experimental Data”. National Tax Journal, 45(1), 107-114.
  4. Andrighetto, G., Zhang, N., Ottone, S., Ponzano, F., D'Attoma, J., Steinmo, S. (March 2016). “Are Swedes more honest than Italians? Ordinary Dishonesty in Cross-Country Tax Compliance Experiments”. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(472). Backhaus, J. G., 2001. “Fiscal Sociology: What For?”. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 61(1), 1-33.
  5. Backhaus, J. G., 2004. “Joseph A. Schumpeter’s Contributions in the Area of Fiscal Sociology: A First Approximation”. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14, 143-151.
  6. Batrancea, L. M., Nichita, R. A., Batrance, I., Moldovan, B. A. (2012). “Tax Compliance Models: From Economic to Behavioral Models”. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 36, 13-26.
  7. Bobek, D. D., Hageman, A. M., Kelliher, C. F. (2013). “Analyzing the Role of Social Norms in Tax Compliance Behavior”. Journal of Business Ethics, 115, 451-468.
  8. Brun, B. L. (2013). “Fiscal Sociology: An Innovative Approach of Citizenship and Democracy Design”. Essentials of Fiscal Sociology: Conception of an Encyclopedia (Ed. J. G. Backhaus). Frankfurt, 11-14.
  9. Campbell, J. L., 1993. “The State and Fiscal Sociology”. Annual Review of Sociology, 19, 163-185.
  10. Çevik, S. (July-December 2012). “Taxpayer Interaction with the State and Society, Individual Norms and Tax Ethics”. Journal of Public Finance, 163, 258-289.
  11. D'Attoma, J., Volintiru, C., Steinmo, S. (April-June 2017). “Willing to share? Tax compliance and gender in Europe and America”. Research and Politics, 1-10.
  12. D'Attoma, J. (2018). “What explains the North–South divide in Italian tax compliance? An experimental analysis”. Acta Politica, 54, 104-123.
  13. Dhami, S. and al-Nowaihi, A. (2006). “Why Do People Pay Taxes? Prospect Theory Versus Expected Utility Theory”. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 64(1), 171-192.
  14. Dubin, J. A., Graetz, M. J., Wilde, L. L. (May 1987). “Are We A Nation of Tax Cheaters? New Econometric Evidence on Tax Compliance”. American E