SavedAdd your journal

Journals / The Journal of Cognitive Systems / 2017 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

NON CLASSICALITY IN MIND

Deniz TÜRKPENÇE
Pages
44–46
Publication Date
2017-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study presents standard EEG methods to obtain the data, then some methods will be briefly surveyed analyzing non-classical effects by using EEG data.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Understanding the mechanisms of human decision making is of significant importance to the cognitive science.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Today’s motivation on artificial intelligence and machine learning has been focused on more humanoid machines.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study presents standard EEG methods to obtain the data, then some methods will be briefly surveyed analyzing non-classical effects by using EEG data.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:EEG methods · Quantum non-locality · Cognitive systems

Abstract

Understanding the mechanisms of human decision making is of significant importance to the cognitive science. Today’s motivation on artificial intelligence and machine learning has been focused on more humanoid machines. Classical machine learning algorithms are based on classical logic and probability. However, empirical evidence shows that human decision behavior reveals some non-classical aspects such as context effects, order effects or ambiguity aversion. Electroencephalography (EEG) is a well-known way to obtain and interpret the brain signals for diverse goals. This study presents standard EEG methods to obtain the data, then some methods will be briefly surveyed analyzing non-classical effects by using EEG data.

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜRKPENÇE, D. (2017). NON CLASSICALITY IN MIND. The Journal of Cognitive Systems, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 44–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/806270

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Brazier, M. A. B., A History of the Electrical Activity of the Brain; The First Half-Century, Macmillan, New York, 1961
  2. Massimo, A., ‘In Memoriam Pierre Gloor (1923–2003): an appreciation’, Epilepsia, 45(7), July 2004, 882
  3. Grass, A. M., and Gibbs, F. A., ‘A Fourier transform of the electroencephalogram’, J. Neurophysiol., 1, 1938, 521–526
  4. Shipton, H. W., ‘EEG analysis: a history and prospectus’, Annual Rev., Univ. of Iowa, USA, 1975, 1–15
  5. Busemeyer, J. R., & Bruza, P. D. (2012). Quantum models of cognition and decision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  6. Haven, E., & Khrennikov, A. Y. (2013). Quantum social science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  7. Bell, J. S. (1966). On the problem of hidden variables in quantum theory. Reviews of Modern Physics, 38, 447-452
  8. Leggett, A. J., & Garg, A. (1985). Quantum mechanics versus macroscopic realism: Is the flux there when nobody looks? Physical Review Letters, 54, 857-860
  9. Ashwal, S., and Rust, R., ‘Child neurology in the 20th century’, Pedia. Res., 53, 2003, 345–361
  10. Niedermeyer, E., ‘The normal EEG of the waking adult’, Chapter 10, in Electroencephalography, Basic Principles, Clinical Applications, and Related Fields, Eds E. Niedermeyer and F. Lopes da Silva, 4th edn, Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1999, 174–188
  11. EEG Signal Processing S. Sanei and J. Chambers  2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
  12. Atmanspacher, H., Römer, H., & Walach, H. (2002). Weak quantum theory: Complementarity and entanglement in physics and beyond. Foundations of Physics, 32, 379_406
  13. Necker, L. A. (1832). Observations on some remarkable phenomenon which occurs in viewing a figure of a crystal or geometrical solid. The London and EdinburghPhilosophy Magazine and Journal of Science, 3, 329_337
  14. Atmanspacher, H., Filk, T., & Römer, H. (2004). Quantum Zeno features of bistable perception. Biological Cybernetics, 90, 33_40
  15. Atmanspacher, H., Filk, T., & Römer, H. (2008).Complementarity in bistable perception. In H. Atmanspacher, & H. Primas (Eds.), Recasting reality _ Wolfgang Pauli's philosophical ideas in contemporary science (pp. 135_150). Berlin: Springer
  16. Atmanspacher, Filk, T (2010). proposed test of temporal nonlocality in bistable perception. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 54, 314_321
  17. Misra, B.,&Sudarshan, E. C. G. (1977). The Zeno's paradox in quantum theory. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 18, 756_763
  18. Piantoni G