SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

THE EFFECTS OF ROLES OF POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC ACTORS ON BUSINESS STRATEGIES IN THE TRANSITION FROM LIBERALISM TO NEO-LIBERALISM: A THEORETICAL DISCUSSION IN THE CONTEXT OF US BUSINESS

LİBERALİZMDEN NEO-LİBERALİZME GEÇİŞTE DEVLETİN VE EKONOMİK AKTÖRLERİN OYNADIKLARI ROLLERİN İŞLETME STRATEJİLERİNE ETKİLERİ: ABD İŞLETMELERİ BAĞLAMINDA BİR TEORİK TARTIŞMA

Hüseyin Çağatay KARABIYIK
Prof. Dr. Ahmet DİKEN
Pages
220–228
Publication Date
2020-12-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, in the economic world dominated by Liberalism and then Neo-Liberalism, the interaction of political and economic actors has undergone significant changes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The forces that have shaped the human history have been evaluated mostly within the framework of politics, economy and legal forces since the first studies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The systematic studies about these approaches go back to “Mukaddime” that was written by İbn-i Haldun in 1332.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, in the economic world dominated by Liberalism and then Neo-Liberalism, the interaction of political and economic actors has undergone significant changes.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Political Economy · Politics · Economy

Abstract

The forces that have shaped the human history have been evaluated mostly within the framework of politics, economy and legal forces since the first studies. The systematic studies about these approaches go back to “Mukaddime” that was written by İbn-i Haldun in 1332. The interaction between these forces has been discussed in both theory and practice in the history of economics. However, in the economic world dominated by Liberalism and then Neo-Liberalism, the interaction of political and economic actors has undergone significant changes.

Özet

İnsanlık tarihine yön veren güçler ilk çalışmalardan günümüze değin çoğunlukla siyaset, ekonomi ve hukuk erkleri çerçevesinde değerlendirilmiştir. Bu yaklaşım üzerine sistematik yazınlar İbn-i Haldun’un 1332 yılında kaleme aldığı Mukaddime (2004) eserine kadar gitmektedir. Ekonomi tarihi boyunca da bu erklerin birbirleri arasındaki etkileşim gerek teori gerekse pratikte tartışılmaya devam edilmiştir. Ancak önce Liberalizm ve ardından Neo-Liberalizmin egemenliği görülen ekonomik dünyada siyasi ve ekonomik aktörlerin etkileşimi önemli değişimlere uğramıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARABIYIK, H. Ç., DİKEN, P. D. A. (2020). THE EFFECTS OF ROLES OF POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC ACTORS ON BUSINESS STRATEGIES IN THE TRANSITION FROM LIBERALISM TO NEO-LIBERALISM: A THEORETICAL DISCUSSION IN THE CONTEXT OF US BUSINESS. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 220–228. https://ajindex.com/articles/80606

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (23)

  1. Aggarwal, R.K.,Mescchke, F. and Wang, T.Y. (2012), “Corporate Political Donations: Investmentor Agency?”, Business and Politics, 14(1), 1-40.
  2. Boas, T. and Gans-Morse, J. (2009), “Neoliberalism: From New Liberal Philosophyto Anti-Liberal Slogan”, StCompInt Dev, 44, 137-161.
  3. Brunell, T.L. (2005), “The Relationship Between Political Parties and Interes Groups: Explaining Patterns of PAC Contributions to Candidates for Congress”, Political Research Quarterly, 58 (4), 681-688.
  4. Clawson, D. and Neustadtl, J.B. (1986), “The Logic of Business Unity: Corporate Contributions to the 1980 Congressional Elections”, American Sociological Review, 1986(51), 797-811.
  5. Clawson, D. and Neustadtl, A. (1989), “Interlocks, PACs, and Corporate Conservatism”, American Journal of Sociology, 94(4), 749-773.
  6. Cooper, M.J.,Gulen, H. and Ovtchinnikov, A. (2010), “Corporate Political Contributions and Stock Returns”, The Journal of Finance, LXV(2), 687-724.
  7. Dean, T.J., Vryza, M. and Frywell, G.E. (1998), “Do Corporate PACs RestrictCompetition? An Empirical Examination of Industry PAC Contributions and Entry”, Business &Society, 37(2), 135-156.
  8. Durmuş, M. (2010),
  9. Kapitalizmin Krizi, Ankara:
  10. Tan Kitabevi Yayınları.
  11. Ericson, R.,Barry, D. and Doyle A. (2000), “The Moral Hazards of Neo-Liberalism: LessonsfromthePrivateInsuranceIndustry”, EconomyandSociety, 29, 532-558.
  12. Evans, D. (1988), “Oil PACs and Aggresive Contribution Strategies”, Journal of Politics, 50(4), 1047-1056.
  13. Federal Election Committee (2018), https://www.fec.gov/updates/foreign-nationals/, Erişim Tarihi: 07.05.2019.
  14. Forrest, R.,Hirayama, Y. (2015), “The Financialisation of the Social Project: Embedded Liberalism, Neoliberalism and Home Ownership”, Urban Studies, 52(2), 233-244.
  15. Friedman, M. (2011).
  16. Kapitalizm ve Özgürlük, İstanbul:
  17. Plato Yayınevi.
  18. Grant, J. T. and Dudolph, T.J. (2002), “To Give or not to Give: Modeling Individuals’ Contribution Decisions”, Political Behaviour, 24(1), 31-54.
  19. Haldun, İ. (2004),
  20. Mukaddime, İstanbul:
  21. Yeni Şafak Kitap. Hamzaçelebi, E. vd. (2015), Sosyal Bilimler Ne İşe Yarar?, İstanbul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  22. Hansen, W.L. and Mitchell, N.J. (2000), “Disaggregating and Explaining Corporate Political Activity: Domestic and Foreign Corporations in National Politics”, American Political Science Review, 94(4), 891-903.
  23. Hersch, P.,Netter, J. M. and Pope, C. (2008), “Do Campaign Contributions and Lobbying Expenditures by FirmsCreate “Political” Capital?”, International Atlantic Economic Society,